Made with Love

ACTUAL SCIENTIST: "Climate Change is a Scam!"

Canada-Man

Reviewer
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
2,289



Published on May 1, 2017
In a very special #LwC, for one full hour, we sat down with Dr. Patrick Moore, PHD in Ecology and founder of Greenpeace, and dissected the scam that is modern "climate change".
 
200.webp
 
Apparently you can pay some people enough to support the oil industry.

Funny how REAL scientist who publish in REAL science journals who back up their with arguments with REAL data are overwhelmingly presenting data that show climate change.

Even economists are publishing projections of economic problems from climate change.
I draw your attention to page 16.
 
Apparently you can pay some people enough to support the oil industry.

Funny how REAL scientist who publish in REAL science journals who back up their with arguments with REAL data are overwhelmingly presenting data that show climate change.

Even economists are publishing projections of economic problems from climate change.
I draw your attention to page 16.

Thanks, nnt.
 
Apparently you can pay some people enough to support the oil industry.

Funny how REAL scientist who publish in REAL science journals who back up their with arguments with REAL data are overwhelmingly presenting data that show climate change.

Even economists are publishing projections of economic problems from climate change.
I draw your attention to page 16.

Don't bother trying to prove anything to CC man, he is a copy and paste advocate and believes all he finds online. He will hunt the net and find every nay sayer out there, regardless of anyone's actual personal experience/knowledge or credentials. It's what he does.
 
Apparently you can pay some people enough to support the oil industry.

Funny how REAL scientist who publish in REAL science journals who back up their with arguments with REAL data are overwhelmingly presenting data that show climate change.

Even economists are publishing projections of economic problems from climate change.
I draw your attention to page 16.



repeating the claim that the oil industry is paying skeptics does not make it true.

the data behind global warming are faked and based on manipulated computer models and scar mongering tactics. in the 1940s-1970s when global temps declined the scare was global cooling and a new ice age.

economists are not qualified to say anything about the science behind the earth's climate



25 years of doomsday predictions none of which came true


For decades now, those concerned about global warming have been predicting the so-called “tipping point” — the point beyond which it’ll be too late to stave off catastrophic global warming.

It seems like every year the “tipping point” is close to being reached, and that the world must get rid of fossil fuels to save the planet. That is, until we’ve passed that deadline and the next such “tipping point” is predicted.

Would you believe it was eight years ago today that the United Nations predicted we only had “as little as eight years left to avoid a dangerous global average rise of 2C or more.” This failed prediction, however, has not stopped the U.N. from issuing more apocalyptic predictions since.

To celebrate more than two decades of dire predictions, The Daily Caller News Foundation presents this list of some of the “greatest” predictions made by scientists, activists and politicians — most of which we’ve now passed.

1. 2015 is the ‘last effective opportunity’ to stop catastrophic warming
World leaders meeting at the Vatican last week issued a statement saying that 2015 was the “last effective opportunity to negotiate arrangements that keep human-induced warming below 2-degrees [Celsius].”

Pope Francis wants to weigh in on global warming, and is expected to issue an encyclical saying basically the same thing. Francis will likely reiterate that 2015 is the last chance to stop massive warming.

But what he should really say is that the U.N. conference this year is the “last” chance to cut a deal to stem global warming… since last year when the U.N. said basically the same thing about 2014’s climate summit.

2. France’s foreign minister said we only have “500 days” to stop “climate chaos”
When Laurent Fabius met with Secretary of State John Kerry on May 13, 2014 to talk about world issues he said “we have 500 days to avoid climate chaos.”

Ironically at the time of Fabius’ comments, the U.N. had scheduled a climate summit to meet in Paris in December 2015 — some 565 days after his remarks. Looks like the U.N. is 65 days too late to save the world.

3. President Barack Obama is the last chance to stop global warming
When Obama made the campaign promise to “slow the rise of the oceans” some environmentalists may have taken him quite literally.

In 2012, the United Nations Foundation President Tim Wirth told Climatewire that Obama’s second term was “the last window of opportunity” to impose policies to restrict fossil fuel use. Wirth said it’s “the last chance we have to get anything approaching 2 degrees Centigrade,” adding that if “we don’t do it now, we are committing the world to a drastically different place.”

Even before that, then-National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center head James Hansen warned in 2009 that Obama only “has four years to save Earth.” I wonder what they now think about their predictions?

4. Remember when we had “hours” to stop global warming?
In 2009, world leaders met in Copenhagen, Denmark to potentially hash out another climate treaty. That same year, the head of Canada’s Green Party wrote that there was only “hours” left to stop global warming.

“We have hours to act to avert a slow-motion tsunami that could destroy civilization as we know it,” Elizabeth May, leader of the Greens in Canada, wrote in 2009. “Earth has a long time. Humanity does not. We need to act urgently. We no longer have decades; we have hours. We mark that in Earth Hour on Saturday.”

5. United Kingdom Prime Minister Gordon Brown said there was only 50 days left to save Earth
2009 was a bad year for global warming predictions. That year Brown warned there was only “50 days to save the world from global warming,” the BBC reported. According to Brown there was “no plan B.”

Brown has been booted out of office since then. I wonder what he’d say about global warming today?

6. Let’s not forget Prince Charles’s warning we only had 96 months to save the planet
It’s only been about 70 months since Charles said in July 2009 that there would be “irretrievable climate and ecosystem collapse, and all that goes with it.” So the world apparently only has 26 months left to stave off an utter catastrophe.

7. The U.N.’s top climate scientist said in 2007 we only had four years to save the world
Rajendra Pachauri, the former head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said in 2007 that if “there’s no action before 2012, that’s too late.”

“What we do in the next two to three years will determine our future. This is the defining moment,” he said.

Well, it’s 2015 and no new U.N. climate treaty has been presented. The only thing that’s changed since then is that Pachauri was forced to resign earlier this year amid accusations he sexually harassed multiple female coworkers.

8. Environmentalists warned in 2002 the world had a decade to go green
Environmentalist write George Monbiot wrote in the UK Guardian that within “as little as 10 years, the world will be faced with a choice: arable farming either continues to feed the world’s animals or it continues to feed the world’s people. It cannot do both.”

In 2002, about 930 million people around the world were undernourished, according to U.N. data. by 2014, that number shrank to 805 million. Sorry, Monbiot.

9. The “tipping point” warning first started in 1989
In the late 1980s the U.N. was already claiming the world had only a decade to solve global warming or face the consequences.

The San Jose Mercury News reported on June 30, 1989 that a “senior environmental official at the United Nations, Noel Brown, says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000.”

That prediction didn’t come true 15 years ago, and the U.N. is sounding the same alarm today.

25 Years Of Predicting The Global Warming 'Ti | The Daily Caller
 
Climate change occurs regardless of man but man does add to the changes. It's science and commonsense.
 
Don't bother trying to prove anything to CC man, he is a copy and paste advocate and believes all he finds online. He will hunt the net and find every nay sayer out there, regardless of anyone's actual personal experience/knowledge or credentials. It's what he does.


so it i ok for you to copy and paste pit bull propaganda you agree with and dismiss anybody who disagree with you? and constantly use the nanny dog myth that pit bill advocates say is a myth?
 
so it i ok for you to copy and paste pit bull propaganda you agree with and dismiss anybody who disagree with you? and constantly use the nanny dog myth that pit bill advocates say is a myth?

LOL, you can't let that puppy go?
 
economists are not qualified to say anything about the science behind the earth's climate

well by that standard you certainly NOT qualified... so shut about it!!!!

but economist know more about data and data analysis than you and its real data and its really happening
the consequences are not just the death of living creatures (the 6th mass extinction), but huge impacts on the economy... Its already happening... the current disasters in the middle east started as food riots that resulted from climate change. This pattern will continue as the world runs short of food.
Its estimated that higher temperatures will reduce the global food supply between 15% and 44%.

Cristi you are probably right, but one has to challenge those in denial in the hope that they won't fool others into buying their nonsense.

the oceans are dying due to increasing dissolved CO2

Try and understand this.

CO2 is a greenhouse gas is well known physics fact.
We've released billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere... thats an economic and historical fact available in the annual report of every oil industry report.
natural sources of CO2 do not account for the atmospheric build up of the gas.
The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has been going up in pace with human use of fossil fuel; that's also a physical fact.
The temperature has been climbing -- that's a physical fact.
But weather and climate are inherently chaotic and it is difficult to predict or figure out a schedule.
difficulty predicting how bad the outcome will be should never be an excuse for doing nothing especially given that our food security is at stake.
there is NO upside to fucking with the climate.

There is a an important delay effect between CO2 and temperature caused by melting ice which takes an enormous amount of energy out of the system (it takes energy to melt ice), and thus the current temperature is a gross underestimate of how much damage we have already done to this planet, but it will be our children and their children who suffer from our stupidity.

There is no uncertainty that we are messing up the planets life support systems on the planet with pollution, but the severity of the consequences are as yet unknown.
Best case scenario is massive economic disasters around the world... worst case scenario is human extinction.
 
well by that standard you certainly NOT qualified... so shut about it!!!!

but economist know more about data and data analysis than you and its real data and its really happening
the consequences are not just the death of living creatures (the 6th mass extinction), but huge impacts on the economy... Its already happening... the current disasters in the middle east started as food riots that resulted from climate change. This pattern will continue as the world runs short of food.
Its estimated that higher temperatures will reduce the global food supply between 15% and 44%.

doomsday and scare mongering predictions have been made in the last 40-50 years since the global cooling scares of the 1950s-70 none of them came true


Cristi you are probably right, but one has to challenge those in denial in the hope that they won't fool others into buying their nonsense.

the oceans are dying due to increasing dissolved CO2


oceans are not dying due to dissovles C02 that's more scaremongering. C02 is 0.04% of air



CO2 is a greenhouse gas is well known physics fact.
We've released billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere... thats an economic and historical fact available in the annual report of every oil industry report.
natural sources of CO2 do not account for the atmospheric build up of the gas.
The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has been going up in pace with human use of fossil fuel; that's also a physical fact.
The temperature has been climbing -- that's a physical fact.
But weather and climate are inherently chaotic and it is difficult to predict or figure out a schedule.
difficulty predicting how bad the outcome will be should never be an excuse for doing nothing especially given that our food security is at stake.
there is NO upside to fucking with the climate.

water vapour is the biggest greenhouse gas that is ignored by the climate alarmists

also credible experts are predicting lower average global temps for the nex few decades because oof lower solar activity from the sun

it's the sun's solar activities not CO2 which is responsible for global average temperature changes


Correlation of global temperature with solar activity




Diminishing solar activity may bring new Ice Age by 2030 – Astronomy Now

solar activity is decreasing
 
doomsday and scare mongering predictions have been made in the last 40-50 years since the global cooling scares of the 1950s-70 none of them came true





oceans are not dying due to dissovles C02 that's more scaremongering. C02 is 0.04% of air





water vapour is the biggest greenhouse gas that is ignored by the climate alarmists

also credible experts are predicting lower average global temps for the nex few decades because oof lower solar activity from the sun

it's the sun's solar activities not CO2 which is responsible for global average temperature changes


Correlation of global temperature with solar activity




Diminishing solar activity may bring new Ice Age by 2030 – Astronomy Now

solar activity is decreasing


You can no more fix stupid than you can prevent liberals from being elected.
 
"it's the sun's solar activities not CO2 which is responsible for global average temperature changes"

Again, please try reading some ACTUAL science of a change.

As to doomsday... some of those doomsday ideas have been averted because of regular... The ozone for example is a good example of where science and politicians worked together and averted a disaster... why the current generation of US politicians are such idiots is hard to say... but again... read some real science.
 
"it's the sun's solar activities not CO2 which is responsible for global average temperature changes"

Again, please try reading some ACTUAL science of a change.

As to doomsday... some of those doomsday ideas have been averted because of regular... The ozone for example is a good example of where science and politicians worked together and averted a disaster... why the current generation of US politicians are such idiots is hard to say... but again... read some real science.

Co2 or hydrogen.............We are just guessing

of course I know CO2 extinguishes fires.
 
Co2 or hydrogen.............We are just guessing

of course I know CO2 extinguishes fires.

Guessing? You're telling me that science can put a man on the moon, but can't figure out that CO2 retains heat from the sun.
Its not guessing its PHYSICS.
The only real uncertainty is how bad the result will be.
 
You can no more fix stupid than you can prevent liberals from being elected.

Good thing some people are getting educated... it'll be a sad world indeed if the US conservative hatred of science becomes the norm.
Sad to see that non-sense leaking over into Canada (man).
 
"it's the sun's solar activities not CO2 which is responsible for global average temperature changes"

Again, please try reading some ACTUAL science of a change.

As to doomsday... some of those doomsday ideas have been averted because of regular... The ozone for example is a good example of where science and politicians worked together and averted a disaster... why the current generation of US politicians are such idiots is hard to say... but again... read some real science.


the doomsday predictions are false


Correlation of global temperatures with solar activity




Diminishing solar activity may bring new Ice Age by 2030 – Astronomy Now
 
Back
Top Bottom