Made with Love

B.C. judge refuses to recuse herself for crying in court

That's our legal system, not to be confused with a justice system.

I particularly get a kick out of another judges comment on the case,...

"Sundhu said that a presiding judge should be able to determine if they should recuse themselves because the judge is the one in the courtroom and able to evaluate the merits of the application."

I mean come on now, that is fricken hilarious,... :rofl!:
 
God said:
You mean lawyers and judges have feelings Hmmmmmm

Yes, but the judge obviously couldn't control her feelings, so she should be out, our "legal system" being what it is, self policed, doesn't work.
 
Last edited:
ROBERTSON said:
Yes, but the judge obviously couldn't control her feelings, so she should be out, our "legal system" being what it is, self policed, doesn't work.


Nah - it was a sentencing hearing in which guilt was already determined and sentencing carries guidelines, max sentences, min sentences, etc. So following those, even after crying at a victim statement, is not hard.

Controlling one's emotions during a victim impact statement are certainly different than overall control of one's feelings. A victim impact statement is meant to do exactly that. Make everyone who hears feel part of what the victim felt when they were affected by whatever crime that happened. Judges are quite often moved by these statements. They are allowed because it is the only time that a victim can really express the true impact the crime had on them. Just because she cried doesn't negate the fact that another judge could have been equally moved by the statement but just didn't shed a tear.
 
^
You seem to be closer to this than I, who would make the final decision, on what the sentence will be ?
 
Wonder if the jury cried on this one.

Jury convicts man for sexually assaulting a woman on a plane as his wife sat next to him

Chicago Tribune - We are currently unavailable in your region

t was a late-night flight from Las Vegas, and the woman rested her head on the window as the plane neared Detroit.

She was startled awake by the man in the middle seat next to her. His hand was down her unbuttoned pants, and her shirt was undone.
The 22-year old woman fled to the back of the plane to alert flight attendants.

But first she had to get past two obstacles: Prabhu Ramamoorthy, the man in the middle seat, and his wife in the aisle seat — an arm's length away from a chill-inducing Jan. 3 incident later described in court.
 
ROBERTSON said:
^
You seem to be closer to this than I, who would make the final decision, on what the sentence will be ?


The judge would but there is always sentencing guidelines to follow that have already been put on the books. It is not like she can sentence the man to death when we have no death penalty. Just like she could not sentence for life if the max sentence is 5 years.
 
Martin said:
Wonder if the jury cried on this one.

Jury convicts man for sexually assaulting a woman on a plane as his wife sat next to him

Chicago Tribune - We are currently unavailable in your region

t was a late-night flight from Las Vegas, and the woman rested her head on the window as the plane neared Detroit.

She was startled awake by the man in the middle seat next to her. His hand was down her unbuttoned pants, and her shirt was undone.
The 22-year old woman fled to the back of the plane to alert flight attendants.

But first she had to get past two obstacles: Prabhu Ramamoorthy, the man in the middle seat, and his wife in the aisle seat — an arm's length away from a chill-inducing Jan. 3 incident later described in court.


I am glad he was arrested and convicted and I hope he gets the book thrown at him. What I don't understand is why the wife has not been charged either. Obstruct justice, perjury, and I am sure there is some type of charge relating to letting your hubby sexual assault a woman beside you and not doing anything to stop it.
 
Back
Top Bottom