Baby threat to National security.

[Butch]

https://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2012/02/08/mp-baby-house-removed.html

 

[Jesus]

Oh Jesus :dontknow:

 

[tboy]

It says no one asked her to remove her baby.....so who knows?

But honestly, every mother everywhere states/avows that "their baby wasn't doing anything" just like the hundreds on the planes I've been on where they've screamed their lungs out for 4 hrs non-stop or the one that threw up all over the carpet across the aisle from me and stunk up the whole plane.....

Nope, never caused a fuss, never lol......

 

[a 1 player]

As a breast feeding mother she has the right to feed her baby anywhere. If I were her I would have pulled a tit out.

 

[tboy]

As a breast feeding mother she has the right to feed her baby anywhere. If I were her I would have pulled a tit out.

That may be true (about the right to feed her baby anywhere) but there comes a sense of propriety, as to when and where it should be done. I realize that it really is no big deal but you know, if I had a colonstomy bag I certainly wouldn't want to change it in the house of commons lol...

But, as I said, there are conflicting reports as to whether or not she was asked to remove her child anyways......

 

[Mufasa]

As a breast feeding mother she has the right to feed her baby anywhere. If I were her I would have pulled a tit out.

Since when does someone have the right to breast feed in the House of Commons when discussing the time allocation of a Bill. HA!

It was all about the fact that the baby may cause a disturbance if the little one started crying, they were just trying to avoid that situation because if the baby started wailing they would then have to ask her to leave and it would have been embarassing for everyone.

 

[zorro]

There's a place and time for everything and I don't believe the House of Commons is a place for running a daycare.

 

[-b]

There's a place and time for everything and I don't believe the House of Commons is a place for running a daycare.

Think about what you stated.....This is the reason women do not get ahead in the
work force......I know many women exc...who have their infants at work till they are
one year old.....this is one of the most important time in a baby life to attach to
their mom or father......but it usually comes down to mom.......What better place
for showing we has Canadians feel that men and women are Equals.

 

[Maurice Boscorelli]

Isn't this what maternity leave is all about.

Like Zorro stated bringing a 3 month old into the house of commons isn't a well thought out idea.

 

[SillyGirl]

If I'm understanding it correctly, she got called into work unexpectedly and had no childcare available, so she brought the baby with her. That's fine, but if there was someone available to watch the baby after she either was or wasn't told to remove him, there was someone available before and she should have arranged that. A 3mo baby is a very unpredictable creature, apt to start wailing at any moment, and why should the business of government have to stop and wait for him to stfu?

Children don't belong at work, period. Whether with mom or dad, it doesn't matter, the workplace is for work and no one is entitled to disrupt it with their kid. Even a well-behaved child is a distraction, at best. If bonding with the kid after maternity/paternity leave is over means so much, stay home or get another job with different hours. Still breastfeeding? That's what breastpumps are for.

If someone wants to revolve their world around their kid, that's fine. But I'm sick of them expecting everyone else's world to revolve around it too.

 

[Anto]

MP and her baby welcome back in Commons after ‘misunderstanding’

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada...elcome-back-in-commons-after-misunderstanding

 

[tboy]

If I'm understanding it correctly, she got called into work unexpectedly and had no childcare available, so she brought the baby with her. That's fine, but if there was someone available to watch the baby after she either was or wasn't told to remove him, there was someone available before and she should have arranged that. A 3mo baby is a very unpredictable creature, apt to start wailing at any moment, and why should the business of government have to stop and wait for him to stfu?

Children don't belong at work, period. Whether with mom or dad, it doesn't matter, the workplace is for work and no one is entitled to disrupt it with their kid. Even a well-behaved child is a distraction, at best. If bonding with the kid after maternity/paternity leave is over means so much, stay home or get another job with different hours. Still breastfeeding? That's what breastpumps are for.

If someone wants to revolve their world around their kid, that's fine. But I'm sick of them expecting everyone else's world to revolve around it too.

Holy crap, you be careful SG, they'll kick you outta the women's club! lol (btw, I agree 100% with everything you said!!)

As for Bliss trying to make this about the man trying to keep women down......BS total poppycock.

LOL a PAGE told her the baby had to go? FFS that's like a street cleaner telling me I couldn't park somewhere......lol...that's ludicrous!!!! all this over what a PAGE said to an MP??? fuuuckk.....must be a slow news week lol....

 

[-b]

Isn't this what maternity leave is all about.

Like Zorro stated bringing a 3 month old into the house of commons isn't a well thought out idea.

There is a belief in Canada that everybody is entitle to Mat leave....not the case....
If you own your own business etc.....I knew Professors, Doctors who brought their infants to work....
It is the House Of Commons...I can understand a tot or preschooler and if I read the other newspapers other infants have grace the Commons.......So lack of communication......