IN-Call BBBJ/LFK versus CBJ/DFK

[MrPrezident]

Building a Base of "Regular" Clients

Building a Base of "Regular" Clients

I might repeat in either case but to become a "regular" in the sense of having a favorite SP I would need to receive both DFK and BBBJ. I would then build new encounters for variety around that one "regular" I that I really enjoy.

I have had that sort of arrangement in the past, sometimes for as long as 5 years. Lately that favorite has been harder to find, even though the number of SPs overall has increased. Sometimes what you get is what the girl wants to give and sometimes you just hit it off more with somebody. It is what it is.

I would think that some SPs who are more restrictive end up seeing many more clients once or twice.

 

[Newman301]

BBBJ RULES !!!

 

[Lone Wolf]

I might repeat in either case but to become a "regular" in the sense of having a favorite SP I would need to receive both DFK and BBBJ. I would then build new encounters for variety around that one "regular" I that I really enjoy.

I have had that sort of arrangement in the past, sometimes for as long as 5 years. Lately that favorite has been harder to find, even though the number of SPs overall has increased. Sometimes what you get is what the girl wants to give and sometimes you just hit it off more with somebody. It is what it is.

I would think that some SPs who are more restrictive end up seeing many more clients once or twice.

The poll question wasn't designed to try to elicit what it would take to make a particular lady anyone's favorite SP.
The question was posed as noted in post 12, in response to an either/or type proposition.

I do agree with your statement that the more restrictive ladies do end up seeing more clients once (which makes sense), and if they are particularly attractive, maybe two or three times (while guys will assess if their "mileage" is likely to improve with subsequent visits)

While I do sympathize with your difficulty in finding another favorite lady, I disagree with the implied premise that while there are more ladies in the field, that fewer of them are offering DFK and BBBJ. It may be that your overall requirements/standards (as they pertain to beauty and intelligence) have remained the same, or even increased over the period of time since you had the 5 year relationship. Clearly there are several beautiful and intelligent ladies who possess a great sense of humor, and who also offer DFK and BBBJ.

Here are a dozen ladies who you might consider:





https://torontopassions.com/spdir/opensp/id/1304145430e1e28d5a2a544becb802bbc529a552b5





(since you have seen her before, and you seemed to like her,
and since her repertoire appears to have expanded to some degree, as per Kirk's review, you might consider seeing her again,
to determine whether her repertoire has expanded for you.) I would likely wait a few weeks, if I were in your situation.

 

[opsoprano]

Hot chick: dfk and cbj. Average chick: lfk and bbbj.but there are always exceptions

 

[oyster shucker]

LW,

First off, Good poll.

Second, I'll take CBJ with DFK, but the DFK better be DDFK. Unless of course the BBBJ includes CIM, then I'll take that over the DFK. And if SW is on the menu then even more so.LOL

Third, Oceanne does not do DFK. And Mary is very very very YMMV on DFK and BBBJ.

 

[Mercury]

I think dfk is overrated. There is nothing better than to have her lips and tongue curling through my shaft sans condom.

 

[playfulgr]

I chose BBBJ/LFK

Getting a hot young babe sucking on junior with no cover does it for me.
Plus you don't get CIM or SW with a cover.

 

[Jack The Ripper]

DFK RULES!!!!!!!!!

 

[j]

I am going to play Devil's Advocate here. While I agree that DFK does contribute to the illusion of intimacy,
I would submit that a CBJ detracts substantially more to the illusion of intimacy.
Ask yourself this question. Did you ever get a CBJ from one of your real life girlfriends?

Then ask yourself this: Is your real life girlfriend an sp who gives bbbjs to 20 or more different guys every week?

Sps are not your girlfriends, just in case people are confused. Not sure why they should risk their health and long term prospects in this biz to provide this illusion of intimacy. In fact, I would think that the DFK is what provides intimacy, whereas the bj itself, covered or not, is a simple sex act that could be performed by an SW in the front seat of the car. NO intimacy whatsoever in a bj, imo. Actually, creates a lot more distance, and of course, completely one sided pleasure.

 

[j]

The poll question wasn't designed to try to elicit what it would take to make a particular lady anyone's favorite SP.
The question was posed as noted in post 12, in response to an either/or type proposition.

I do agree with your statement that the more restrictive ladies do end up seeing more clients once (which makes sense), and if they are particularly attractive, maybe two or three times (while guys will assess if their "mileage" is likely to improve with subsequent visits)

.

I liked your poll question, but especially had a laugh at the ones who wanted to vote for both.

I would like to point out that you and the one who mentioned it would be completely wrong about the sps who offer cbjs seeing clients only once maybe twice. In the first place, no client shows up to an sp (unless she is misrepresenting services (or an agency misrepresents them)) believing he is going to be getting bbbj when all she offers is cbj. She would let him know, or her ad or website does. If he shows up thinking it is a ymmv thing and he should be getting one and that's why he doesn't repeat, sure, but he's a fool. When an sp tells potential clients what is available he shows up knowing its cbj, because that is what he is looking for, comfortable with, or could care less about bjs. It isn't a 'given' that a safe GFE provider is going without regulars.

How long do you think safe GFE providers could last if that were the case? 3 months, 6, a year? It seems that this sort of provider actually lasts longer than the ones who offer more than that. I had a first time client yesterday, by his choice, no kissing, no daty, and chose to see me specifically because I only do cbj. I have never, for any amount of extra, or as a 'reward' for regulars or whatever other nonsense some sps do with their restrictions, never provided a bbbj. And have an extremely high rate of returns, and regulars who have seen me for years and years.

But cbjs are not uncommon out here, in fact more common (referring to legal sps only) especially amongst indys, agencies and mps.

I liked your choices in the poll. I think the number of true GFE seekers prefer the kissing over the bbbj, but a PSE seeker would go for the bj. Kissing is never important in porn.

 

[Catcher]

Kissing is never important in porn.

It isn't :dontknow:

In lesbian porn it is :smiling:

 

[Old'man]

I chose BBBJ/LFK

Getting a hot young babe sucking on junior with no cover does it for me.
Plus you don't get CIM or SW with a cover.

What he said.