Made with Love

Body Shaming Debate

UncleBob

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
338
A photo of a girl who was sent home from school for wearing an "inappropriate" outfit has gone and sparked a debate about , and .

Erica Edgerly, 21, from Texas, US, shared the photo on Facebook on 2 April 2015, along with a caption explaining why she was angry about the situation:

"Today, my sister was sent home from school for wearing the clothes in the picture below," she wrote.

"And I'm sorry but I have to stand up for my family and for women who are degraded and judged for their bodies and clothing everyday."

"People wonder why women feel insecure about their bodies or what they wear... And it's because you're told your clothing is inappropriate when you're completely fully clothed, even when you're not showing cleavage or anything," Edgerly added.

"How about instead of body shaming women, school systems should start teaching 15-18-year-old boys to stop degrading women with their eyes and contributing to the rape culture of today's society.

"Bottom line, girls cannot go to school in comfortable clothes THAT COVER EVERYTHING because school systems are afraid that hormonal boys won't be able to control their eyes and minds.

"And that is such a bigger problem than worrying about clothing.
"No, I do not believe that all boys in middle school/high school degrade young women or sexualize their bodies.

"That is my point... this is not an inappropriate outfit, yet some are worried it might be seen that way, so they send girls home to change to try to avoid an issue and THAT is the problem.

"Not to mention, when you send someone home because of inappropriate clothing, you're taking away from their eduction.
"So I guess it's more important for boys to not have distractions (even when they're aren't any [Sic]) than a woman's education. When will people realize how big of an issue this really is?"

The post quickly went viral attracting more than 91,000 shares, with people commenting that they "couldn't see anything wrong with the outfit".

"I have been saying the same thing that you said for so long," wrote one commenter.

"Why should girls have to base their clothing choices on boys who can't learn to control themselves? Plus her whole body is completely covered so I don't see what the problem is."

In a later Facebook post Edgerly clarified that the school had taken issue with her sister's top because the sides of her shirt were not "fingertip length".

She also added that her original post hadn't been intended to directly criticise her sister's school, rather she had hoped to raise a point about a wider issue.

"My point is in no relation to the school board, the school district, or the administration specifically, (because again I know they were just doing their job) but society in general considering this happens all over the nation every day," she wrote on Facebook.

"So many young girls (and their mothers) have messaged me thanking me because their school sent them home for being fully clothed, but one part of their outfit hugged one part of their God given bodies a little too tight, and was seen as inappropriate and that is the real issue here."

The Orangefield Independent School District sent the following statement to TODAY.com:

“While the District cannot disclose or discuss the details of any student's disciplinary or educational matter due to federal and state confidentiality laws, we want to assure our community that Orangefield ISD strives to maintain a positive and successful learning environment for our students free from disruption and distraction, which includes enforcement of our student dress code,” superintendent Stephen Patterson said.



Dr Rory Fox, headteacher at Ryde Academy on the Isle of Wight responded with a letter on the schools website which read:
"We are preparing students for the world of work so it is important that we teach students about the importance of managing their appearance and working to a dress code.

"We have a number of female students who have recently said that they are coming under peer pressure to wear their skirts shorter than they feel comfortable.

"It is not fair that girls should be made to feel uncomfortable when they are just following the uniform policy. We have therefore decided to act at this point in time, to correct uniform issues."

10311745_992790690732133_8486729345529732013_n.jpg




 
Maybe once sharia law takes grasp in the US and Canada outfits will no longer be an issue.

images
:no:
 
Those with children and others who have influence on them should be teaching that it is more important to be -quote- Soul food and not eye candy
 
Those with children and others who have influence on them should be teaching that it is more important to be -quote- Soul food and not eye candy

And yet, its sexy when a women is confident about herself, and I don't mean just in the looks department. In everything. A confident women is the biggest aphrodisiac for me...
 
And yet, its sexy when a women is confident about herself, and I don't mean just in the looks department. In everything. A confident women is the biggest aphrodisiac for me...

Confidence is sexy in both sexes and really has nothing to do with looks, it's about accepting and understanding yourself, your limits, possibilities, abilities and ethics, etc, imo. I often feel hypocritical making statements as to wanting others to appreciate people for "inner beauty" rather than their exteriors. Being in and loving a business that caters to the physical. But even so, I believe you can pander the physical without defining what is beautiful, if that makes sense:)
 
Seems like the administration is just acting according to their dress code.
As outlined in their student handbook.

I don't think the reaction is due to body shaming, just a matter of her outfit not fitting in with the guidelines of their archaic dress code. She wore tight fitting pants, her shirt did not fit the criteria specified in item #2 and she was sent home. "Body shaming" isn't the issue, updating their dress policy is.

Orangefield High Student Handbook said:
DRESS AND GROOMINGThe District's dress code is established to teach grooming and hygiene, to prevent disruption, and minimize safety hazards.Students and parents may determine a student's personal dress and grooming standards, provided that they comply with thefollowing:
1. All shorts are to be "fingertip length" or longer. (Fingertip length means: The hem of the shorts meets the fingertips whenarms are held straight down at your side.)

2. Dress or skirt length must be closer to the knees than the fingertips when hands are held straight down at your sideregardless of clothing under dress or skirt. (To check yourself at home place your hands down at your side the hem shouldfall around 3” or more below your fingertips.)


3. Blouses and shirts should cover shoulders and chest. There will be no bare midriffs or backs. Clothing made of see-throughfabrics shall not be worn. No undergarments will be visible. No spaghetti straps or string tie straps will be allowed.

4. No shirts with neck and sleeves cut out, or tank tops allowed. Shirts that button must be buttoned. The top two buttons maybe unbuttoned.

5. Tight fitting pants, and tights are not allowed unless worn under other garments. (See #2)


6. Garments or jewelry with vulgar or suggestive markings or slogans may not be worn. Garments with slogans dealing withguns, alcohol, drugs, or tobacco products are not allowed.

7. Sunglasses are not allowed.

8. Jeans or other clothing with holes may not be worn.

9. Earrings prohibited on males. Make-up may only be worn by females. Body piercing, gages, and clear spacers are prohibited for all students.

10. Tattoos should be covered when possible.

11. Hats are not allowed.

12. Hair shall be worn any length as long as it is neat, clean and out of the eyes. Mohawks and unnatural makeup and hair colors are prohibited as well as any other styles that cause a disruption.Exceptions to any part of this dress code may be approved by the administration on special occasions. Any apparel not covered above, which would be deemed unacceptable by school authorities, may not be worn.If the principal determines that a student’s grooming or clothing violates the school’s dress
 
@Transient-you are right, but the over all look isn't offence or sexual. I think those rallying against the action are just using that instance as a forum to push their message, even though.
 
@Transient-you are right, but the over all look isn't offence or sexual. I think those rallying against the action are just using that instance as a forum to push their message, even though.

Yep, I totally agree that this is not an offensive outfit in anyway.
But the argument being put forth by Older Sister, is it's a body shaming issue, when it looks to me like it is an objective enforcement of garment length in accordance to their dress code policy.

The dress code doesn't specify male or female.
I would be curious if males infringing on the dress code are policed as stringently as females.
 
Back
Top Bottom