Made with Love

Drivers stoned on drugs besides booze to face same penalties

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robintheboywonder
  • Start date Start date
R

Robintheboywonder

Guest
Stoners beware.

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada...ugs-besides-booze-to-face-same-penalties.html

Motorists stopped by police for driving while high on marijuana — or other drugs — will face the same penalties as drunk drivers starting Sunday in Ontario.
At a minimum, that means fines of $180 and the immediate suspensions of driver’s licences under legislation passed last year to combat growing problems with drivers under the influence.

Criminal charges can also be laid, as with drunk driving. Sentences can range up to five years.

“What we do know from law enforcement is that there is an increase of those who are impaired by drugs, especially in combination with alcohol,” Transportation Minister Steven Del Duca said this week.

“At all times, if you get behind the wheel of a car or any other vehicle on the road, you shouldn’t be impaired by anything. Not alcohol. Not drugs.”

Drivers who fail a field sobriety test on the roadside face a three-day licence suspension for a first occurrence, seven days for a second and 30 days for a third.
Licences can be suspended for 90 days and vehicles impounded for seven days if motorists are taken to a police station for further evaluation by a drug recognition expert, including a urine test.

That assessment would determine what category of drug and alcohol the driver has consumed, said Const. Clint Stibbe of Toronto Police traffic services.

Toronto Police have dealt with 57 drug impaired drivers so far this year, up dramatically from 21 in the same period of 2015, he added.
Getting the message out that impaired driving is dangerous and deadly remains “sadly, a challenge,” Stibbe said.
“The community must recognize their responsibility and the risk they take when driving while impaired.”

With the federal government expected to legalize marijuana, authorities are keen on bolstering the message that driving while high is not only illegal, but dangerous, said Del Duca, who attended a meeting of transportation ministers on Wednesday.

“We want to make sure that everyone understands there is a potential challenge for road safety.”
The federal government has been warned that legalization could lead to a “significant increase” in drug-impaired driving.

The group Mothers Against Drunk Driving has pressed for a separate category of drug-impaired driving in the Criminal Code, which could lead to the setting of legal limits of the active ingredient in marijuana — tetrahydrocannabinol or THC, in the body.

In the United States, Colorado and Washington have set legal limits of 5 nanograms of THC per millilitre of blood, while Ohio and Nevada pegged the limit lower at two nanograms.

Del Duca wouldn’t say what Ontario would consider a safe level of THC in the blood for driving.

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada...ugs-besides-booze-to-face-same-penalties.html

 
Most of my doper friends say they are better drivers when they are stone. It keeps them more focused on the road out of paranoia.
 
I'm not a lawyer but wouldn't any test requiring human bodily fluids(saliva or blood) require a warrant?
 
I'm not a lawyer but wouldn't any test requiring human bodily fluids(saliva or blood) require a warrant?

Just mention my name and they will give you a break or maybe break you.

Maybe don't mention my name.
 
This could be you.

giphy.gif
 
Canada faces choice on international drug treaties over legalized pot
Legalizing pot will violate international treaties. What should Canada do?

As Canada moves forward with its plan to legalize marijuana, government officials have at least one international conundrum to sort out: what to do about the global treaties Canada has signed that prohibit making pot legal?

A senior government official said there are essentially two options available. On the one hand, Canada could take a "principled stand" in favour of the international legalization of pot. The other, quieter approach, would be to withdraw from the treaties and attempt to re-enter with a special exemption for legalized marijuana.

It's the second option, causing the "least international turbulence," that the federal government favours, said the source.

But at least one Canadian researcher believes that would be a missed opportunity for Canada.

Steven Hoffman, a professor at the University of Ottawa, is co-author of a paper that identified two treaties Canada's new pot policy is expected to violate:

  • 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.
  • 1988 Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances

Hoffman said there is precedent for the quieter option.

In Bolivia, there is a traditional practice of chewing coca leaf, the raw ingredient for cocaine, which the 1961 convention considers a narcotic. In 2012, Bolivia withdrew from the UN treaty. The next year, other member states allowed Bolivia to re-accede with a reservation for chewing coca.

Is Hoffman surprised Canada would consider a similar approach? "No. The quieter approach is probably the easier approach," he said in an interview with CBC News.

Treatment of drug addicts

However, Hoffman would like to see Canada push for change in the way drug addicts are treated by international treaties, which require possession and use of narcotics to be criminal offences. "Canada would be making a huge difference if we could even just nudge the rest of the world towards treating addicts like human beings in need of medical assistance rather than criminals in need of punishment and imprisonment."

He notes, though, that Canada "would need to devote a lot of global political capital to this issue" and is likely more preoccupied with using that capital on issues such as climate change. Still, Hoffman thinks the most important key is that Canada actually make the move to withdraw and re-accede, rather than simply violate the treaties. He argues that kind of disregard for international law would set a troubling example.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/marijuana-legalization-pot-anti-drug-treaties-1.3780661
 
Back
Top Bottom