Made with Love

Out-Call Girls that bear no resemblance to their picture or description

LickingGravity

Reviewer
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Messages
4,747
I'm not going to mention the girl of the agency for reasons that I will explain later. I have never used a Toronto agency prior to this as I see escorts mainly when I go to Montreal where I have been favouring Indy's

Last night I ordered delivery from a well known, well respected TO agency. The girl I picked has been in their line up for awhile and has smokin' pictures on their website and has had a few reviews although I couldn't find them yesterday.

Her description is 23 years old 5'6" 34b-22-34 and 115lbs. I know she has tats. I'm not very good with age but when she arrives she looks like 28 to 30. That's ok as I may be wrong and typically I prefer 30 anyway.

What my real complaint is is that if I had to guess it would be more accurate to classify her as 5'7" 34b - 28 - 38 and 140 lbs. No one would confuse her with the pics the way she looks now. For other reasons, which I won't go into, I am fairly sure its not a bait and switch and this is the same girl, but clearly significantly different from advertised.

Kept the appointment and had a really good time and she was a great girl with a terrific personality, good in bed and good to talk to. So not a bad appointment at all but the next day you have to think that you were still taken advantage of a bit so hence this post. I don't have a limited body type that I like but I know guys like tboy, for example, who really do do favour 34" hips and smaller and who would have gone bonkers.

I figure that if no one complains agencies will just keep on being dishonest. Who knows I might have booked her with the " honest" pictures anyway. There is no need for agencies to alienate clients this way. We all laugh about the lying about age and you see Indy's saying their age is in real and not expressed in "escort years". But when you totally mislead on body type you have to treat that a little more seriously. 115lbs is only an ideal if you guys make it so.

So here is what I resolve to do. Sometime in the next month I will see another girl from this agency, as to be fair this may be a one-off or the pictures are just out of date ( how long does it take to pack on 25 lbs). If this girl is more or less accurately described all will be forgotten. If the same thing happens again obviously one would have to conclude it is commonplace.

I'm not mentioning the escort's name as she was a really nice girl and probably doesn't deserve any backlash. My advice to her is to get her agency to update her profile so its a bit closer.
 
Class act LG. I know that sometimes agencies cheat a little bit which is expected. But a 25 lbs - and from a 22 to 28 / 34-38. Well to me that is being dishonest. I presume you won't tell us who the agency is?. Maybe you should so they can see that we are watching.
 
One hopes that any agency who does this will think I'm talking about them. I did use the exact measurements in they use in their ad. I did look for previous reviews on a free public board and there are lots of them but nothing with any detail for about 2 years.There are more recent ones on another site but I'm not a member.
 
Since LG is being a gentleman. Who has the time to check the outcall agencies for those stats?. I am a lazy fuck but curious to know who is the culprit here.
 
One great post. I will find out who it is, but is it worth saying who it is?.
 
LG, I have been in your shoes before. I just don't call that agency anymore. You can only fool me once.
 
I find the photo shopping is at a all time high with all the popular agencies. The pics look incredible and set up a higher expectation which is a big let down once the door opens.
 
I do agree some of the photographers really know what they are doing. One of the let downs that I have is too much ink which is hidden in the photos. I know it's done for security reasons and I really appreciate it when the agency lists the fact of tattoos in the description.
 
We forget that we are the only ones that can complain. 75-80 of their clients do not read review boards so they have nowhere to bitch at.
 
Oliver Twisted said:
We forget that we are the only ones that can complain. 75-80 of their clients do not read review boards so they have nowhere to bitch at.

Not true. They can complain to the agency. That is who the OP should be talking to as well, imo.

The best way to deal with things is right away, on the spot, while sp is there, and the agency can be called when you have a discrepancy between what they told you and what she tells you in person too, or who she ends up being in person. No sp that sounds as cool as this one would want to be in a position where the client is really unhappy/angry or rude about this kind of discrepancy (I won't say deceit, but deliberate deceit also can happen. The sp is in the middle of it all, imo). But the agency booking has to hear the complaint, and not get the booking fee, i.e affecting their pockets is what sends the message. meanwhile that sp is not available while this is going on, sure it afffects her biz, but she is doubly not going to be happy with the way the agency is marketing her if it is losing her business, not increasing it.
 
shadowsun said:
sure it afffects her biz, but she is doubly not going to be happy with the way the agency is marketing her if it is losing her business, not increasing it.

Bingo!!!!


But don't the sp see their pics before they come out and say to the owner. Hey, that doesn't look like me.
 
If a site has natural pics some will complain that the agency should hire a real photographer and when they do we have are hopes and fantasies shattered. I for one love it when the agency is taking their own pics, at least I know more or less what to expect when walking through the door.
 
Back
Top Bottom