Made with Love
Cupid Escorts
Thehiddenpages

Global warning data was a face. Exclusive news: World leaders were duped.

Jump to Latest
ReservoirDog said:
Climate change report says humans "extremely likely" to blame for warming - CBS News

Trump must be pissed now that a new report says it's getting worse.
Click to expand...

""It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century," the report says. "Over the last century, there are no convincing alternative explanations supported by the extent of the observational evidence.""

Based purely on the scope of our data this is our conclusion.

Yes facts not considered might yield different results.
Fortunately we did not analyze them.

That is what they said.
 
Republican lawmaker: Rocks tumbling into ocean causing sea level rise | Science | AAAS

And these people are running the country -- these people are making laws and its terrifying.


Brooks then said that erosion plays a significant role in sea-level rise, which is not an idea embraced by mainstream climate researchers. He said the California coastline and the White Cliffs of Dover tumble into the sea every year, and that contributes to sea-level rise. He also said that silt washing into the ocean from the world's major rivers, including the Mississippi, the Amazon and the Nile, is contributing to sea-level rise.


"Every time you have that soil or rock or whatever it is that is deposited into the seas, that forces the sea levels to rise, because now you have less space in those oceans, because the bottom is moving up," Brooks said.
 
Anto said:
Republican lawmaker: Rocks tumbling into ocean causing sea level rise | Science | AAAS

And these people are running the country -- these people are making laws and its terrifying.


Brooks then said that erosion plays a significant role in sea-level rise, which is not an idea embraced by mainstream climate researchers. He said the California coastline and the White Cliffs of Dover tumble into the sea every year, and that contributes to sea-level rise. He also said that silt washing into the ocean from the world's major rivers, including the Mississippi, the Amazon and the Nile, is contributing to sea-level rise.


"Every time you have that soil or rock or whatever it is that is deposited into the seas, that forces the sea levels to rise, because now you have less space in those oceans, because the bottom is moving up," Brooks said.
Click to expand...


Makes as much sense as anything else.
 
Reality

Reality

Prim0 said:
Hmmm......seems like someone here pointed this out a long time ago....

Are electric cars worse for the environment?
Click to expand...

So many believers can't comprehend even the basics involved here.

- Horsepower, is calculated by, RPM * Torque / 5252=HP.

- For every horse power consumed, is equal to roughly 750 watts.

- Lets assume, very conservatively, an electric car is consuming 20 HP while being driven, that is equal to 15,000 watts, per car.

- ALL of that energy that was consumed, has to be replaced, by recharging the battery, plus losses.

- That will NOT be coming from solar cells at night, for obvious reasons, and most likely NOT from the billions $ wind mills at night either.

- The current Tesla "battery" technology consists of between 7,000 and 8,000 lithium cells wired in a series/parallel configuration, and would cost $15,000 US to replace, now that sounds like a solution.

- If a lithium "battery" falls below 20% charge, it MUST be replaced, this has already occurred.

- You cannot drive from Toronto to Montreal with a single charge.

PS: I have over simplified some points here, simply for discussion.
 
ROBERTSON said:
So many believers can't comprehend even the basics involved here.

- Horsepower, is calculated by, RPM * Torque / 5252=HP.

- For every horse power consumed, is equal to roughly 750 watts.

- Lets assume, very conservatively, an electric car is consuming 20 HP while being driven, that is equal to 15,000 watts, per car.

- ALL of that energy that was consumed, has to be replaced, by recharging the battery, plus losses.

- That will NOT be coming from solar cells at night, for obvious reasons, and most likely NOT from the billions $ wind mills at night either.

- The current Tesla "battery" technology consists of between 7,000 and 8,000 lithium cells wired in a series/parallel configuration, and would cost $15,000 US to replace, now that sounds like a solution.

- If a lithium "battery" falls below 20% charge, it MUST be replaced, this has already occurred.

- You cannot drive from Toronto to Montreal with a single charge.

PS: I have over simplified some points here, simply for discussion.
Click to expand...

Electric cars based on Lithium battery technology are not the long term, strategic solution to automotive pollution either, given that demand for the element itself with outstrip it's natural occurrence and deplete the world's available supply sometime about 60 or so years from now, should large scale manufacturing continue to be be pursued.
 
demien3k5 said:
Electric cars based on Lithium battery technology are not the long term, strategic solution to automotive pollution either, given that demand for the element itself with outstrip it's natural occurrence and deplete the world's available supply sometime about 60 or so years from now, should large scale manufacturing continue to be be pursued.
Click to expand...

True dat.

Still, what ever the solution, the amount of energy consumed from a storage system, MUST be replaced.

Well maybe each car could have power sourced from dilithium crystals :)

And then they could go REALLY fast.
 
ROBERTSON said:
True dat.

Still, what ever the solution, the amount of energy consumed from a storage system, MUST be replaced.

Well maybe each car could have power sourced from dilithium crystals :)

And then they could go REALLY fast.
Click to expand...

I am running mine on Snowflake tears.
 
ROBERTSON said:
True dat.

Still, what ever the solution, the amount of energy consumed from a storage system, MUST be replaced.

Well maybe each car could have power sourced from dilithium crystals :)

And then they could go REALLY fast.
Click to expand...

Don't tell anyone but they are in the necklace

 
jevrejeva-sea-levels-1700-1800-1900-2000-global-2.jpg

As can be seen, the self proclaimed "experts", don't have a clue what is causing ocean levels to rise.
 
Oh c'mon now this is getting ridiculous!

Data was not just a face he had a body too.
He looked just like you or I, no different than anyone else really;

data_phone1.jpg

Ok maybe he was a little bit different... but clearly not just a 'face'
Max headroom was basically a face, not data.

And nobody was duped. There certainly wasn't any need for a global warning! :NoNoNo:

Jezz go take some android sensitivity training buddy.
 
[h=2]In 2017, bitcoin mining generated 69 million tonnes of CO2[/h]
[h=1]Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2°C[/h]Bitcoin is a power-hungry cryptocurrency that is increasingly used as an investment and payment system. Here we show that projected Bitcoin usage, should it follow the rate of adoption of other broadly adopted technologies, could alone produce enough CO2 emissions to push warming above 2 °C within less than three decades


Bitcoin mining could cancel out climate change efforts, scientists say | CBC News
 
And also made video cards over priced.

There has to be some buying of governments to let this sham continue, or black mail.

Doesn't make any sense to allow it to continue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Why Do Many Reasonable People Doubt Science?
Replies
8
Views
1K
DonCorleo
D

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom