Made with Love

Internet throttling to stop by march...

tboy

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2010
Messages
9,197
Bell announced in Dec that they would stop internet throttling....funny, how they denied they were doing it in the first place....rogers seems to be following suit also....

All I can say is: it's about fucking time. I mean, they charge us to pay for certain speeds, then limit those speeds. IMO this was like a gas station charging you for 30 litres of gas and only giving you 20.....
 
Oh well, I am not sure what that means. I just pay my monthly bills without complaints. I got tired of trying to figure it all out.
 
McGuinty said:
Oh well, I am not sure what that means. I just pay my monthly bills without complaints. I got tired of trying to figure it all out.

Likewise you penny pincher liar :music:
 
McGuinty said:
Oh well, I am not sure what that means. I just pay my monthly bills without complaints. I got tired of trying to figure it all out.

Ok, what it means is:

If you buy their internet performance package at say 6 mps. That means you should get files transferring at 6 megabytes per second. That means if you download a 6 megabyte picture, it will complete in 1 second. Or so they tell you. What they've all been doing is if (I guess through software monitoring) they notice you downloading a picture or video or movie or playing an online game, where you have a lot of data going up and down, they will throttle it or slow it down.

For eg: since I've been with bell, and download torrents, I have rarely been able to get about 20 kbps. That's .02 mps or less than 10% of the speed they are charging for. I also noticed when I played battlefield bad company online, I was always 2 seconds behind everyone else. That is because Bell (and others) are throttling the speed in which data gets to and from my computer. Even though we are paying for a high speed connection....

This is one of the things that made me finally realize that our elected officials really aren't out to look out for us, the citizens. Bell et al have been doing it for years, and the CRTC did squat about it.

How long do you think Bell et al would be able to get away with it if they were applying the same logic to telephone service? For example: if Bell et al "decided" to limit your calls to 2 minutes or less? Or if your call went over 2 minutes, they'd cause so much static on the line that you couldn't hear what the other person was saying?

Another example: You buy a new mustang GT500. It is rated at 460 hp. So you like to accelerate quickly onto the highway using 460 hp to get up to highway speeds fast. Ford installs a monitoring device on the mustang that sends them a signal whenever you press down hard on the gas peddle. When they notice you doing this they retard the timing so you don't get 460 hp, you only get 200 hp and the mustang slows down to Kia speed.
 
Too late, they lost a customer in me already. I'm with Primus and very happy there
 
When I was on Bell I called them up to ask why I wasn't getting the speeds that they advertised.
They said that I'd never be able to.
 
tboy said:
Ok, what it means is:

If you buy their internet performance package at say 6 mps. That means you should get files transferring at 6 megabytes per second. That means if you download a 6 megabyte picture, it will complete in 1 second. Or so they tell you. What they've all been doing is if (I guess through software monitoring) they notice you downloading a picture or video or movie or playing an online game, where you have a lot of data going up and down, they will throttle it or slow it down.

For eg: since I've been with bell, and download torrents, I have rarely been able to get about 20 kbps. That's .02 mps or less than 10% of the speed they are charging for. I also noticed when I played battlefield bad company online, I was always 2 seconds behind everyone else. That is because Bell (and others) are throttling the speed in which data gets to and from my computer. Even though we are paying for a high speed connection....

This is one of the things that made me finally realize that our elected officials really aren't out to look out for us, the citizens. Bell et al have been doing it for years, and the CRTC did squat about it.

How long do you think Bell et al would be able to get away with it if they were applying the same logic to telephone service? For example: if Bell et al "decided" to limit your calls to 2 minutes or less? Or if your call went over 2 minutes, they'd cause so much static on the line that you couldn't hear what the other person was saying?

Another example: You buy a new mustang GT500. It is rated at 460 hp. So you like to accelerate quickly onto the highway using 460 hp to get up to highway speeds fast. Ford installs a monitoring device on the mustang that sends them a signal whenever you press down hard on the gas peddle. When they notice you doing this they retard the timing so you don't get 460 hp, you only get 200 hp and the mustang slows down to Kia speed.

Sharp minds think alike. Great answer.
 
paying extra for extra bandwidth usage is not fun,
I liked the old days when u didn't have to pay anything for bandwidth-over-useage.
 
amin2010 said:
paying extra for extra bandwidth usage is not fun,
I liked the old days when u didn't have to pay anything for bandwidth-over-useage.

This is different, bandwidth usage is the amount of data you down or upload. This pertains to how fast you can do it.....

Speaking of "the good old days" I also liked the fact that you used to be able to make local calls to and from your cellphone as long as you were within your carrier's coverage area. Meaning if you lived in Toronto, and were visiting Montreal, you could make or receive calls with no LD or Roaming. Now? If someone from Montreal calls you while you're in Montreal, you get the LD charges......
 
How much you wanna bet BELL stops throttling for a week or so, and then goes right back to throttling
 
How much you wanna bet BELL stops throttling for a week or so, and then goes right back to throttling

well, I've got half a mind to complain to tony clement about this and ask why they are/were allowed to do this when they were advertising a specific data speed then purposely curtailing it. I also want to write to him and ask why we're still paying "debt retirement" on our hydro bills when it's been paid off for years....
 
I also want to write to him and ask why we're still paying "debt retirement" on our hydro bills when it's been paid off for years....

You are reading that wrong. Its not "debt retirement" it's "DEBT,RETIREMENT" which means the debt that Hydro is facing when they retire their highly overpaid executives.
 
well, I've got half a mind to complain to tony clement about this and ask why they are/were allowed to do this when they were advertising a specific data speed then purposely curtailing it. I also want to write to him and ask why we're still paying "debt retirement" on our hydro bills when it's been paid off for years....
Rumor has it Clement is actually very responsive and thorough when it comes to complaints and letters written to him. Even going so far as to respond with his own handwritten letters.

I'm being serious
 
well my isp is great at internet throttling too....can see the amazing results when downloading torrents....but it's not as lame as bell though....
 
Rumor has it Clement is actually very responsive and thorough when it comes to complaints and letters written to him. Even going so far as to respond with his own handwritten letters.

I'm being serious

I know you are. He had a piece/pamphlet circulated up here and he specifically said he welcomed all correspondance and publishes his personal email.....
 
I know you are. He had a piece/pamphlet circulated up here and he specifically said he welcomed all correspondance and publishes his personal email.....
Clement is one of the last, great politicians. He goes out of his way to take care of his constituents

:drunk:
 
I hate Internet throttling and I am glad to hear that this practice is coming to an end.
 
I hate Internet throttling and I am glad to hear that this practice is coming to an end
Ahahhahaaa......what makes you think it will come to an end??!! Because the media said so??!

LOL :biggrin:
 
You are reading that wrong. Its not "debt retirement" it's "DEBT,RETIREMENT" which means the debt that Hydro is facing when they retire their highly overpaid executives.

LOL I was talking about it with someone the other day and I called it the "debt retirement/i need a new lambo" fee......
 
Back
Top Bottom