- Thread starter Falconero
- Start date
F
Fuggedabouditt
Guest
Julia Roberts does nothing for me.
C
cristycurves
Guest
She does nothing for me either, and I've asked her many times.....next time I won't be so nice:wink2::biggrin2:
What A Wookie
Reviewer
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2009
- Messages
- 2,656
Julia is a funny one. I don't think she's unattractive but a little odd looking to be what we would consider classically "beautiful." However sometimes I see certain pictures of her and think she is actually quite beautiful.
Her opposite for me is someone like Jennifer Garner, who I think is beautiful but every so often I see a her and think she's funny looking. :unknw:
Her opposite for me is someone like Jennifer Garner, who I think is beautiful but every so often I see a her and think she's funny looking. :unknw:
Beef Jerky
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2012
- Messages
- 1,405
Crowning Julia Roberts again not a good look for People: Menon
Attempt to graft a grand social statement onto superficial glamour prize — The World’s Most Beautiful Woman — blows up in editors’ faces.
Crowning Julia Roberts again not a good look for People: Menon | Toronto Star
Attempt to graft a grand social statement onto superficial glamour prize — The World’s Most Beautiful Woman — blows up in editors’ faces.
Crowning Julia Roberts again not a good look for People: Menon | Toronto Star
C
cristycurves
Guest
^ That was a telling article, and on point, imo. Here is a clip from it
Quote-But she’s not The World’s Most Beautiful Woman. She’s just marketing fodder and a cynical choice for a pop-cultural media tradition that started with superficial intent but is now aiming to make grander statements, all without letting go of the superficial intent. This makes about as much sense as trying to promote good nutrition via a hotdog-eating contest.
It’s as if senior execs at People held a secret meeting before deciding on Roberts: “Of course she’s not! But this will make us look good!”
No. I’m afraid this makes everyone look bad.
[email protected]
Quote-But she’s not The World’s Most Beautiful Woman. She’s just marketing fodder and a cynical choice for a pop-cultural media tradition that started with superficial intent but is now aiming to make grander statements, all without letting go of the superficial intent. This makes about as much sense as trying to promote good nutrition via a hotdog-eating contest.
It’s as if senior execs at People held a secret meeting before deciding on Roberts: “Of course she’s not! But this will make us look good!”
No. I’m afraid this makes everyone look bad.
[email protected]
Similar threads
