Made with Love

Just a waste of money.

That is very responsible :no:

Officials with the union that represents the bulk of the department’s 9,100 deputies note that the agency is facing a chronic staff shortage and a recurring budget deficit. For the past several years, the department has been keeping about 1,000 professional staff and 300 deputy positions unfilled so that it can overcome a yearly $250-million shortfall. As a result, deputies are often required to work back-to-back shifts.
 
Sorry officer we cant help that you have to work 80 hrs a week and you havent seen your family for a while
but here's a nice shinny gold buckle, do you feel better?
 
More wasted money.

[h=1]Small drone 'shot with Patriot missile'[/h]
Small drone 'shot with Patriot missile' - BBC News

Did you read the whole article, or just the headline?

As the article does bring up an interesting problem.

A Patriot missile - usually priced at about $3m (£2.5m) - was used to shoot down a small quadcopter drone, according to a US general.
The strike was made by a US ally, Gen David Perkins told a military symposium.
"That quadcopter that cost 200 bucks from Amazon.com did not stand a chance against a Patriot," he said.
Patriots are radar-targeted weapons more commonly used to shoot down enemy aircraft and ballistic missiles.
"Now, that worked, they got it, OK, and we love Patriot missiles," the general said.
Recently, there have been reports that some groups, for example in Iraq, have taken to attaching weapons to small, commercial drones and using them against security forces.

However, Gen Perkins suggested deploying large surface-to-air missiles as a defence was probably not economically wise.
"I'm not sure that's a good economic exchange ratio," he told an audience at the Association of the United States Army's Global Force symposium in Alabama.
"In fact, if I'm the enemy, I'm thinking, 'Hey, I'm just gonna get on eBay and buy as many of these $300 quadcopters as I can and expend all the Patriot missiles out there'."
[h=2]'Enormous overkill'[/h]No further details of the encounter - such as where or how recently it took place - were given, but Gen Perkins did describe the party that launched the missile as "a very close ally".
"It is clearly enormous overkill," said Justin Bronk, a researcher at the Royal United Services Institute.
"It certainly exposes in very stark terms the challenge which militaries face in attempting to deal with the adaptation of cheap and readily available civilian technology with extremely expensive, high-end hardware designed for state-on-state warfare."

Mr Bronk also told the BBC that Patriot radar systems, while sophisticated, might struggle to target a small quadcopter effectively.
Patriot missiles were first produced in 1980 and are operated by 12 countries including the US, the Netherlands, Germany, Japan, Israel and Saudi Arabia.
The missiles themselves travel at five times the speed of sound, whereas a quadcopter drone typically has a top speed of 50mph (80km/h).


I certainly agree, using a Patriot was overkill. On the other hand, low tech and "easy to get your hands on" are proving to be heavily used and successful. Just look at IEDs and suicide bombers. Now they're looking at the potential of having to deal with cheap remote drones. So the military has to look at how to safely take down these drones. Now before someone says "just shoot it down with their rifles," at what range can a soldier be expected shoot one down vs what it is the kill radius on say a grenade? You can point at all the drone shooting videos you want on YouTube, but remember those drones pose no risk to the shooters.

Also to point out, the military wasn't sure if their high tech solution, a Patriot missile, would even be able to work vs a small target like a drone.
 
Back
Top Bottom