Made with Love

Kick the judge out?. Damn right I would.

Alomar

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
293
The Ontario Judicial Council has ordered a hearing for Nov. 26 that could lead to the removal of controversial Newmarket Judge Howard Chisvin, who threw out a slate of cases last year when an assistant Crown attorney was late returning from a break.

The announcement of the hearing, to be held at a Bay St. hearing room, comes months after the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that Chisvin’s actions on July 21, 2011 were “high-handed” and did a disservice to the administration of justice.

A week after Chisvin’s dismissal of the cases, chief prosecutor John Ayre complained about his conduct to the Ontario Judicial Council.

In March 2012, the Court of Appeal overturned Chisvin’s ruling and substituted convictions based on the guilty pleas.
Transcripts from July 21, 2011 showed that the Newmarket court recessed at 11:23 a.m. When the judge returned at 11:46 a.m., the Crown wasn’t in court and he was paged on the intercom.

“Tell them they have 30 seconds,” Chisvin instructed his clerk.

However, less than a minute later, Chisvin told court it wasn’t his clerk’s job. “It’s not her function ... to call the Crown's office,” he announced.

At 11:47.48 — 1 minute and 27 seconds after court resumed — the judge announced: “All right, all provincial matters are dismissed for want of prosecution.”

At 11:53.44, Crown attorney Brian McCallion appeared in court, only to be told that it was too late.

“Mr. McCallion, all provincial matters have been dealt with by want of prosecution,” the judge told him. “There was no Crown in here for some 10 minutes and you were paged and paged and paged.”

McCallion apologized and began to talk about a prisoner's psychiatric report he had been studying.

“That might be,” the judge replied. “Court comes when court is back. You were paged. You were paged in the hallway, the Crown’s office was called, no Crown. They’re dismissed for want of prosecution.”

Some of the people Chisvin set free had already pleaded guilty and were simply awaiting sentencing.

Among those set free were a man believed to be a violent paranoid schizophrenic and an alleged drunk driver.

Three complaints to the judicial council were investigated by a two-person complaint subcommittee consisting of a judge and a community member.

A review panel that included two judges, a lawyer member and a community member ordered the hearing.
Chisvin’s hearing before the judicial panel has been scheduled for Nov. 26.

The panel may make a recommendation to the Attorney General that the judge be removed from office.

The hearing panel will be composed of a judge of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, who will chair the panel; a judge of the Ontario Court of Justice; a lawyer member and a community member.

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/cr...-hearing-for-throwing-out-tardy-crown-s-cases
 
Abuse of power is always related to people too comfortable in their position without being accountable to anyone. Clearly this judge deserves to move on.
 
Let him be the passenger of the schizophrenic drunk driver next time he drives.

Would he like that?.
 
The judge obviously had a pickle up his ass and was probably in a hurry to go see an SP he had an appointment with. The tardy Prosecutor was about to rain on his parade and should also have his knuckles wrapped!:wink2:
 
yeah, someone has to teach these idiots that they are NOT god almighty come down from the heavens to mete out what they deem must be.....

TOTAL abuse of power.....he not only should be kicked out of the courts, but have his licence to practice law revoked......
 
I can see the Judge's point.

Justice in Ontario seems to take forever with all the gymnastics that Lawyers resort to. Maybe he was trying to make the point that with everything else that is going on the Prosecutor can at least be to Court at the designated time.

But it was a bit extreme.
 
Or perhaps that particular prosecutor has a bad track record of showing up late, and has been warned previously.
We simply don't know.
 
Art Mann said:
Or perhaps that particular prosecutor has a bad track record of showing up late, and has been warned previously.
We simply don't know.

Very good point. I'm sure there must have been more to this.
 
Ontario needs a "Hanging Judge", like Roy Bean.

I suspect we already have too many Judge JIM Beams.
 
Art Mann said:
Or perhaps that particular prosecutor has a bad track record of showing up late, and has been warned previously.
We simply don't know.

even so, then punish the prosecutor.....not let a bunch of criminals go free.....that's the epitome of a miscarriage of justice.....that's like a cop stopping a car for speeding then charging the passenger but not the driver......totally misguided.....I mean, he even let off those who had already pleaded guilty ffs.....

Sorry, I've known plenty of people, mainly women, who have "misplaced" anger....whereby they are pissed off at someone else, and take it out on me.....I mean, isn't that what "contempt of court" is for?

btw: if an accused is late for court, they'd find him guilty in absentea, not "not guilty"......also, he could have easily postponed any of the pending cases and admonished the prosecutor......his actions were not only reckless but fucking dangerous too.......these judges are supposed to help enforce the law, not make them up as they go along.....
 
tboy said:
even so, then punish the prosecutor.....not let a bunch of criminals go free.....that's the epitome of a miscarriage of justice.....that's like a cop stopping a car for speeding then charging the passenger but not the driver......totally misguided.....I mean, he even let off those who had already pleaded guilty ffs.....

Sorry, I've known plenty of people, mainly women, who have "misplaced" anger....whereby they are pissed off at someone else, and take it out on me.....I mean, isn't that what "contempt of court" is for?

btw: if an accused is late for court, they'd find him guilty in absentea, not "not guilty"......also, he could have easily postponed any of the pending cases and admonished the prosecutor......his actions were not only reckless but fucking dangerous too.......these judges are supposed to help enforce the law, not make them up as they go along.....

You should be running for office young man!
 
tboy said:
btw: if an accused is late for court, they'd find him guilty in absentea, not "not guilty".
wrong they'd issue a bench warrant if the person is coming on their own, and postpone if the person is coming from lockup
 
HoneyBee said:
wrong they'd issue a bench warrant if the person is coming on their own, and postpone if the person is coming from lockup

I knew that, but in the "spirit" of letting off a criminal because the prosecutor is late, ie: if the accused was "late" they'd find him guilty.....capice?
 
Back
Top Bottom