Out-Call Kitty @ Cupids

[SandOnTheBreeze]

Kitty @ Cupids

Face: 7.5/10
Body: 7.75/10
Service: 7/10
Repeat: No


Lately I've been in the mood to see Asians and new girls. Hence the recent sessions with Lily, Jade @ Cupids and Mia @ NGT. Kitty's a cute Korean girl, Canadian raised. I would say more attractive than the photos. Posted age seems in the right range. Photos are accurate, nice slim body with very smooth skin. No tattoos. I believe she is a smoker as I did faintly detect the smell . Not on her breath, but faintly in her hair, which was still a bit of a turn off for me. Very friendly, easy-going, not nervous at all.

Service wise, I guess I got the shorter end of the YMMV stick. I don't know if I did anything wrong, I went through my usual preparations before spending time with a lady.

Her profile does not state GFE, so maybe safe GFE is her MO, I'm not sure. Guess I'll just have to look out for that in the profiles on the Cupids website in the future. DATY was well received, nice and clean. LFK only. CBJ with DT, which felt quite nice, but still does not compare to BBBJ. FS was quite good, nice and vigorous, she does get quite wet.

Overall, even though I was a bit disappointed based on expectations going in, I had a decent time as the sex was good and she does have a good attitude. Looks have always been most important for me, but I guess I've reached a point where I want full GFE services at a minimum unless she is really, really pretty (like Kira ex-Mirage).

I won't be seeing her again, but if you're looking for a young cute Korean, and don't mind safe GFE services, she might be for you.

 

[Romance]

Thanks for the excellent and very informative review.

 

[Valentino]

Appreciate your honesty, Sand. Agencies have to put their menu back in their profiles. Not sure why they don't anymore.

 

[Nova5]

Sand, thanks for sharing your experience with Kitty, hopefully your next encounter will be more satisfying.

 

[Rock23]

At least the sex was good which is a positive. Thanks for being sincere on your review, Sand.

 

[c berrios]

Appreciate your honesty, Sand. Agencies have to put their menu back in their profiles. Not sure why they don't anymore.

Hope Cupids can answer that.

 

[Melike_pussy]

Sorry for your disappointment SOTB. By the looks of it she looks like a wild one. Like the ones that get easily wet.

 

[Senor Gomes]

Amigo you have class.

 

[Chef]

Thanks for sharing, Sandy. Sometimes you just have to chalk it up as part of the game.

 

[elassowipo1]

Thanks for the TOFFT Sands.

 

[Laso]

Thanks for the TOFFT Sands.

Same here. Sands, how many TOFTT you've had that you were surprised she was a winner?.

 

[barbosa]

Appreciate your honest review. You reckon she's been in the business long?.

 

[BadAss]

Very good review. Glad you don't hold anything back like some reviews do. Much appreciated.

 

[BuryTheWeasel]

Thanks for sharing, Sandy. Sometimes you just have to chalk it up as part of the game.

What he said.

 

[SandOnTheBreeze]

Same here. Sands, how many TOFTT you've had that you were surprised she was a winner?.

Actually the majority of them have been worthy of repeats. In the past I've TOFTT with Holly @ GOE, Ellen @ Maximum, Jade @ Cupids, Lily @ Cupids, Miley @ Maximum, Mia @ NGT. I repeated with all of them. You win some you lose some.

 

[barbosa]

Amigo you have class.

Ditto + 1

 

[Ryder]

But TOFTT has different excitement. Honest review Sand, thanks.