Made with Love

IN-Call Marina @ Roommates

Romance

Reviewer
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
1,482
I couldn't find other reviews on her, but I got the impression that she might have been with another agency before.

I found Marina's pictures appealing and her body hot, so I booked her for half an hour. She has an average GND look. Her body looks the same as in pics, but not as toned. Honestly, I don't remember if she had any tattoos or not, but I don't think she had. The session started with minimum kissing, mostly pecking on the lips and rare LFKs when she was not turning her head to avoid kissing. She only gave away one quick DFK for a second and that was it for the whole session (and I'm sure it was not my bad breath or anything like that!). A bit of smell of smoke. The service, other than kissing was average with a good and deep BBBJ and we tried multiple positions, but I would describe the whole session as business like.

Also, I don't like when SP's throw in the word "sweetie" frequently in their conversation, as it gives a very fake and businesslike feeling to the session, specially when it is expressed in a very blunt way. I have to add that she was friendly though. If you are looking to have a quick finish with a relatively hot (body) college girl without any extra connections (cuddling, etc) she might be your girl...
 
Thank you Romance, businesslike is a session killer for me too.
 
Thanks. If I'm not mistaken she was Summer @EC before moving to RM.
Gotta say I don't like fake endearments either.....mood killer for me.
 
Thanks Romance - I was actually very close to booking her, as I liked her pics too. Not interested in a business-like session though, so I think I'll pass.

The good news is, it looks like there's plenty of choice over at Roommates.
 
If she ain't 'bout to dish out an intoxicating and passionate session in the true GFE sense,,,,,not a good fit for me. Was tempted to visit and I appreciate your review. Her BFE (Business Friend Experience) killed the mood (groan!)
 
Thanks for the review. Another no kissing girl from RM. That's 3 that don't dfk...Marina, Pamela and Kaylee.

I agree that the use of "sweetie" or "hun" excessively is a turn off as it feels very business like. Strippers use that term a lot too.
 
Kirk Lazarus said:
Thanks for the review. Another no kissing girl from RM. That's 3 that don't dfk...Marina, Pamela and Kaylee.

I agree that the use of "sweetie" or "hun" excessively is a turn off as it feels very business like. Strippers use that term a lot too.

Can relate but lately it has me thinking how hard it is for the sp to keep up with our standards. They have a hard job to do and getting t0o personal is just not their style. Remember most of them are here to pay their University careers.
 
If I wanted businesslike, I would have stayed married!

Sorry there was no romance for you romance!

Call the agency and let them know.
 
Appreciate the 411. Like this board just for this reason. Honest feedback.
 
Hitter said:
Can relate but lately it has me thinking how hard it is for the sp to keep up with our standards. They have a hard job to do and getting t0o personal is just not their style. Remember most of them are here to pay their University careers.

Fortunately for us, the DFK standard and bbbj standard was established about 10 years ago during the EE invasion when more competition meant better services to distinguish them from the competition. That's why Toronto is a hobbying capital. Reasonable prices and great services including bbbj and dfk.

As client money greases the wheels of the hobby train, we are entitled to expect a standard as long as it's respectful and consensual. DFK is one of those standards. If an SP chooses to accept this standard along with other menu items, she will do well in the industry. If a girl chooses to not accept the standard and not provide DFK, she will have to find other ways to distinguish herself or risk not being as successful as other girls offering popular standards.

If you take the argument that kissing is too personal, then what do you call intercourse? Not as personal?
 
I just met with Marina recently. My review will be up shortly... but my session with her was also so-so (more like 50/50 actually).
 
This is why I love reading reviews. We get to see which ladies and which agencies are the reliable ones. DFK, DATY is a must, the ladies have a right to offer what they like but we have a right to where we spend our hard earned dollars.
 
Madman said:
Thank you Romance, businesslike is a session killer for me too.
You're welcome Madman.


drew said:
Thanks. If I'm not mistaken she was Summer @EC before moving to RM.
Gotta say I don't like fake endearments either.....mood killer for me.
Thanks for the moving info.


Raiden said:
Thank you for TOFTT Romance and reporting back to the bros.
My pleasure bro!


NoSoupForYou said:
Thanks Romance - I was actually very close to booking her, as I liked her pics too. Not interested in a business-like session though, so I think I'll pass.
The good news is, it looks like there's plenty of choice over at Roommates.
You're welcome. There are lots of choices at RM indeed.


crackerjack said:
If she ain't 'bout to dish out an intoxicating and passionate session in the true GFE sense,,,,,not a good fit for me. Was tempted to visit and I appreciate your review. Her BFE (Business Friend Experience) killed the mood (groan!)
You're welcome crackerjack.


Valentino said:
Well at least you got the quick DFK :biggrin2:
Better than nothing :Thatwas-bad::biggrin2:


Senor Gomes said:
She does have a nice culito.
Thanks for the professional assessment :biggrin2:


Kirk Lazarus said:
Thanks for the review. Another no kissing girl from RM. That's 3 that don't dfk...Marina, Pamela and Kaylee.
I agree that the use of "sweetie" or "hun" excessively is a turn off as it feels very business like. Strippers use that term a lot too.
You're welcome Kirk. And well said on your second post.


Hitter said:
Can relate but lately it has me thinking how hard it is for the sp to keep up with our standards. They have a hard job to do and getting t0o personal is just not their style. Remember most of them are here to pay their University careers.
I agree, it's a hard job, but I don't think it's harder than the job most of us deal with every day, especially taking the pay into account.


HOF said:
If I wanted businesslike, I would have stayed married!
Sorry there was no romance for you romance!
Call the agency and let them know.
Well said! Thanks for the empathy! I had too many good sessions at RM to complain about getting a business like session. Can't win them all. Overall, it was not a full GFE but still a decent session.


diner1 said:
Appreciate the 411. Like this board just for this reason. Honest feedback.
You're welcome diner1.


J Strummer said:
I just met with Marina recently. My review will be up shortly... but my session with her was also so-so (more like 50/50 actually).
Seems not a YMMV thing then.


Wilsonjso said:
Thanks Romance for the toftt, I've appreciated the info on her.
You're welcome Wilson.


Dan said:
This is why I love reading reviews. We get to see which ladies and which agencies are the reliable ones. DFK, DATY is a must, the ladies have a right to offer what they like but we have a right to where we spend our hard earned dollars.
Glad the review helps.
 
Back
Top Bottom