Made with Love

New Zealanders perform haka to honour mosque shooting victims

A 28 year old killed 50 Muslims because he kept playing warfare movies. His video was deleted, he wore a camera on his head so all can see what he was doing. Sick fuck.
 
Congratulations to the people for the Haka!
Nice to see the respect for the victims and not all the publicity to the a&& H*$%e that committed the crime.
Even the Prime Minister of New Zealand has said she will NEVER! mention his name.

DILLIGAF
 
New Zealand shooting: Jacinda Ardern bans all military-style semi-automatic guns and assault rifles – live updates


Prime minister announces gun buyback and says parts that can be converted into semi-automatic weapons are also now banned. Follow it live ...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/li...t-live-updates


Q&A - New Zealand's gun law changes explained

The press conference is still going on, but Ardern’s press team have sent over this Q&A.


1. What semi-automatic firearms will be affected by the ban?

The ban will apply to all firearms are now defined as Military Style Semi-Automatics (MSSAs) and will also include assault rifles.


2. What semi-automatic firearms will NOT be affected by the ban?

There is a balance to be struck between public safety and legitimate use. The changes exclude two general classes of firearms which are commonly used for hunting, pest control, stock management on farms, and duck shooting:

· Semi-automatic .22 calibre rimfire firearms with a magazine which holds no more than ten rounds

· Semi-automatic and pump action shotguns with a non-detachable tubular magazine which holds no more than five rounds

3. What semi-automatic firearms are affected by today’s Order in Council?

Two types of firearms are now defined as Military Style Semi-Automatics (MSSAs):

· A semi-automatic firearm capable of being used with a detachable magazine which holds more than five cartridges

· A semi-automatic shotgun capable of being used with a detachable magazine which holds more than five cartridges



4. I have an A-Category firearms licence and now own MSSAs. What should I do?

It would normally be an offence for an A-Category licence holder to possess an MSSA, punishable by up to three years in prison or a $4000 fine. However a transitional period gives time for people to comply with the law, if they take certain steps. The transitional period will be confirmed next month. Firearms owners who unlawfully possess an MSSA now have three options:

· Voluntarily surrender the firearm to Police for safe disposal.

· Complete an online form on the Police website to arrange for the MSSA to be collected, while details are finalised for compensation under a buy back scheme

· Sell or gift the firearm to a person who has an E-Category licence and a ‘permit to procure’ the weapon

5. Are Police geared up to receive large numbers of MSSAs?

Yes. They will work with the New Zealand Defence Force to enable safe storage, transport and destruction of MSSAs. Police are establishing an online form which will make it easier for firearms owners to arrange for Police to collect the MSSAs. The online form will go live over the weekend. It will not be practicable for firearms owners to physically return their weapons to Police stations without prior approval. Where extra administrative staff are required they will be hired on fixed-term contracts.

6. Will this lead to stockpiling of semi-automatics?

No. The changes under the Order in Council take effect immediately. Anyone who now unlawfully has an MSSA, which yesterday was a lawful firearm, needs to take steps to comply with the law.

7. Will some firearms dealers be breaking the law if they have these MSSAs in stock?

Some firearms dealers only hold A-category licences. In order to comply with the law, they could sell their stock of semi-automatics to a Category E licence holder or return them to their supplier.

8. What are the statistics for firearms licences and firearms in circulation?

· There are 245,000 firearms licences

· Of these, 7,500 are E-Category licences; and 485 are dealer licences

· There are 13,500 firearms which require the owner to have an E-Cat licence, this is effectively the known number of MSSAs before today’s changes

· The total number of firearms in New Zealand is estimated to be 1.2-1.5 million

9. What further issues are being considered?

Cabinet will consider further steps on 25 March. These will include measures to:

· Tighten firearms licensing and penalties

· Impose greater controls over a range of ammunition

· Address a number of other issues relevant to special interest groups such as international sports shooters and professional pest controllers, such as DoC.

· Future proof the Arms Act to ensure it is able to respond to developments in technology and society

10. How will the buyback work, and who will administer it?

Police, the Treasury and other agencies are working through the detail. More information will be available when the legislation is introduced next month. The compensation will be fair and reasonable based on firearm type, average prices and the age of firearms.

11. What is the cost of the buyback likely to be?

That is very difficult to judge, given the limited information about the total number of firearms affected by this change. Preliminary advice suggests it could be in the range of $100m-$200m. The buyback will ensure these weapons are taken out of circulation and that we fulfil our obligations under the law.
 
Waxed;n1465552 said:


This looks like the same kid that stood in front of the native protester a few weeks ago and is now involved in a law suit over it!
Something smells fishy on this and is taking away from this horrible tradgedy

DILLIGAF
 
Prim0;n1465544 said:
It's funny. The population of NZ voted down gun laws like these several times during the last few years. Is this a case of a change of their minds or is it just the government deciding what's best for them....even if the majority don't agree with it? My impression is that this change in law is directed by the government and not the people.

Another funny....I want to hear the people that dismiss and insult Christians sending Hope and Prayers do the same to these people that danced. After all, what difference, in the end, does it make?

I also understand it that one one of the sites, a man threw a spear/arrow at the shooter. He missed, but the shooter paused and then fled after that. Imagine if that guy had been armed with a hand gun instead of what he threw? And where the hell did he get a spear? Australia and NZ are fucking nuts.

Have to disagree with you here Primo.
And you missed the symbol of throwing a spear, not fucking nuts, its making a statement without the use of a GUN, which would have endangered other innocent bystanders..

The people of these countries are going to make a decision based on events, not an irrational love of guns.
 
Prim0;n1465893 said:
It's never good to shove things into the dark. Are they afraid others will read it and follow what this POS did or that people might learn from it. Well...that's what a leftist government looks like. Tell you what to do with your guns and what you can and cannot read, think or do. Enjoy NZ.

I'm sure they will, in numerous studies consistently being in the top 10 BEST countries in the world to live, along with Canada.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom