Kirk Lazarus
Reviewer
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2009
- Messages
- 3,861
I was meaning to see Pamela at Maximum Pleasure, but missed her. A Pamela coincidentally appeared at RM when the "Pamela" disappeared from Maximum. I asked around and was told that she moved from Maximum Pleasure to RM. I never miss a second opportunity, so I booked her at RM.
Positives: She's a young college coed with a fresh face. Tall thinnish body with nice soft natural C's. Friendly attitude. For a non-spinner, she's tight. Kitty not shaved bald, but well manicured. If you are looking for a pretty college girl for some banging, go see her, but only if you are ok with the not-so-positives.
Not-So-Positives: She seems shy and demure (some would consider that as a positive). Unfortunately, that shy demure personality carries through to the service. Although thin body, she is soft - still sexy though. No kissing. Probably got in 4 pecks on the lips in total before the dreaded turn the other cheek move.
BBBJ was standard, kind of mechanical as in hand on bottom of shaft, open mouth at tip and moving up and down. MPOS available, but requires direction. During FS, she would periodically check the condom for leaks. During down-time, not too much talking. With the exception of no kissing, GFE services are available, but only upon request. Because of that, the session felt mechanical.
I don't think that she's doing this on purpose, but is a result of her being inexperienced with sex, not sexual, and overly cautious about safety (which is good thing). The combination of that though lead to an uneventful session.
I would not repeat, but if someone outweighs the positives over the not-so, she will not disappoint in the innocent looks department. Maybe with some mentoring from someone like Shannon @ RM and Pamela being more relaxed about sex, she could develop into a more fun girl. Right now, its just physical.
Services are mechanical. Another SP whose service is mechanical (at least when I saw her) is Ciara at Mirage. But she has a hot party girl look to her that I would repeat for 1/2 hour just for the physical part of the session. Pamela wouldn't fall into that category for me.
Positives: She's a young college coed with a fresh face. Tall thinnish body with nice soft natural C's. Friendly attitude. For a non-spinner, she's tight. Kitty not shaved bald, but well manicured. If you are looking for a pretty college girl for some banging, go see her, but only if you are ok with the not-so-positives.
Not-So-Positives: She seems shy and demure (some would consider that as a positive). Unfortunately, that shy demure personality carries through to the service. Although thin body, she is soft - still sexy though. No kissing. Probably got in 4 pecks on the lips in total before the dreaded turn the other cheek move.
BBBJ was standard, kind of mechanical as in hand on bottom of shaft, open mouth at tip and moving up and down. MPOS available, but requires direction. During FS, she would periodically check the condom for leaks. During down-time, not too much talking. With the exception of no kissing, GFE services are available, but only upon request. Because of that, the session felt mechanical.
I don't think that she's doing this on purpose, but is a result of her being inexperienced with sex, not sexual, and overly cautious about safety (which is good thing). The combination of that though lead to an uneventful session.
I would not repeat, but if someone outweighs the positives over the not-so, she will not disappoint in the innocent looks department. Maybe with some mentoring from someone like Shannon @ RM and Pamela being more relaxed about sex, she could develop into a more fun girl. Right now, its just physical.
Services are mechanical. Another SP whose service is mechanical (at least when I saw her) is Ciara at Mirage. But she has a hot party girl look to her that I would repeat for 1/2 hour just for the physical part of the session. Pamela wouldn't fall into that category for me.
