Made with Love

Peter MacKay's "empty words" cut a hole in my heart . . .

  • Thread starter Thread starter Art Mann
  • Start date Start date
A

Art Mann

Guest
Sarah_Hunt.JPG

Dr. Sarah Hunt is a member of the Kwagiulth band of the Kwakwaka’wakw First Nation. She is an independent writer, researcher and advocate who has worked for more than 15 years on Indigenous anti-violence and justice initiatives.

Tina Fontaine’s death shows how little is being done for indigenous women


SARAH HUNT
SPECIAL TO THE GLOBE AND MAIL
Last updated Wednesday, Aug. 20 2014, 3:29 PM EDT

Growing up on an urban reserve, I still remember my excited anticipation as the first day of grade 10 grew near – the friends I would make, the teachers I would have, the possibilities of the school year ahead. This is a feeling Tina Fontaine will never know, as her life was ended violently last week just before the 15-year-old was to head back to school alongside her peers in Winnipeg. Prior to her death, Tina had run away from her group home placement – a demonstration of resistance to a notoriously broken national child welfare system.

Tina was a member of the Sagkeeng First Nation but her loss is deeply felt beyond the local community, as her death is only the latest in the widespread brutality against native women and girls. While Canada might claim to be in an era of reconciliation with indigenous communities, the government’s response to the deaths demonstrates an utter lack of respect for Indigenous people’s lives. Justice Minister Peter MacKay’s mere “prayers and condolences” are evidence that in the place of actual justice, the government continues to provide nothing but empty words with each new murder.

Although the Canadian Human Rights Commission and many others have called for a national inquiry into the root causes of this violence, I remain unconvinced as to its merits. While the government’s refusal to hold an inquiry clearly demonstrates its inability to take our lives and our deaths seriously, this is not necessarily the route to real change.

The inquiry into police misconduct in serial killer Robert Pickton’s murders demonstrated just how limited such inquiries can be, as voices of community stakeholders were shut out of the process. Known by some as “the sham inquiry,” the investigation became yet another level at which indigenous voices are marginalized while police lawyers reaped a huge paycheque over the many months it took to complete. While the recommendations of the inquiry are applauded by some, there is no real mechanism for turning them in to action.

So what is the government taking action on? As Mr. MacKay stated in his response to Tina’s death, the government sees aboriginal justice initiatives (aimed at aboriginal offenders) and a national DNA database for missing persons as appropriate measures. I would argue that these efforts serve to distract from root causes by focusing on indigenous people themselves as the problem.

This sentiment was reinforced when Winnipeg police Sgt. John O’Donovan stated that Tina didn’t realize “the danger she was putting herself in.” What danger is this? The danger of living in a society that condones violence against indigenous women, where killers face few deterrents, and where missing women are blamed for putting themselves “at risk.”

Surely tracking indigenous girls’ DNA so they can be identified after they die is not the starting point for justice. Indigenous women want to matter before we go missing. We want our lives to matter as much as our deaths; our stake in the present political struggle for indigenous resurgence is as vital as the future.



READ FULL STORY HERE
 
Good post Art, I can hear MM chanting already

Harpo has got to go, Harpo has got to go, and I whole heartily agree!
 
This sentiment was reinforced when Winnipeg police Sgt. John O’Donovan stated that Tina didn’t realize “the danger she was putting herself in.” What danger is this? The danger of living in a society that condones violence against indigenous women, where killers face few deterrents, and where missing women are blamed for putting themselves “at risk.”

I for one don't condone violence against indigenous women and really don't know anyone who does.
 
This sentiment was reinforced when Winnipeg police Sgt. John O’Donovan stated that Tina didn’t realize “the danger she was putting herself in.” What danger is this? The danger of living in a society that condones violence against indigenous women, where killers face few deterrents, and where missing women are blamed for putting themselves “at risk.”

I for one don't condone violence against indigenous women and really don't know anyone who does.


That's the great irony, isn't it?

Individually, none of us condone this violence or know a soul who does. Yet the holes in the very fabric of our social system allow people to fall through, particularly those without the white middle-class advantages we enjoy. Unless we study or work the fringes of society, we become blithely unaware of how our society fails those less fortunate.

When missing women are blamed for putting themselves at risk, as the police sargeant does above, and when killers of disenfranchised women appear less likely to face apprehension, then Dr Sarah Hunt strikes me entitled to argue "the danger she was putting herself in" is the danger of living in a society that condones violence against indigenous women by turning its attention to issues deemed more pressing to the advantaged class.
 
Peter MacKay's lack of regard for others tells me he is deficient in one of his chromosomes or other significant brain matter, needed to function properly as a basic human being. His morality politics and hubris to think he can eliminate prostitution, the oldest entrenched custom on earth is nothing short of remarkable.
 
Again...things have to be done FOR someone.

So this girl ran away from a home and something terrible happened to her. Is there no responsibility on the girl for running away? Nobody should be harmed by another person...that doesn't mean that there aren't some evil people out there that are looking to harm others. Hell, if she'd been attacked by a bear, would this article be about how the government isn't doing enough to protect native girls from bears? WTF?

I should be able to cross the street with the light and not worry about getting hit by a car...but that doesn't remove the responsibility for me to look both ways before stepping into the street in case some driver isn't paying attention, racing to make a light, or just plain fucking around.

And what the fuck does her being "indigenous" have to do with anything. Reread the story without including the word indigenous or native or whatever.....hell, you could even leave out the fact that she's female....it's still a tragedy that someone went out on their own and ran across trouble with a bad person. Should there be a police officer to walk around every single square inch of the world to make sure that noone is ever harmed while out and about? Should each person have their own personal bodyguard?

Yet again, race, ethnicity, religion, gender or whatever have to be needlessly inserted into a story and common sense and personal responsibility get ignored.


It scares me that I agree with you!:biggrin2:

Peter MacKay's lack of regard for others tells me he is deficient in one of his chromosomes or other significant brain matter, needed to function properly as a basic human being. His morality politics and hubris to think he can eliminate prostitution, the oldest entrenched custom on earth is nothing short of remarkable.

I also totally agree with you young lady and I love your avatar, it's almost as sexy as mine!

This group of conservatives are much much worse than Brian Mulroney's henchmen ever were. This group's roots are from Preston Manning's Reform Party. Rule on ideology and religion based idiotic policies.

Brian was a union basher yes but didn't get involved with moralistic and religious policies like these idiots do.

ps....Analme, please get it right and say it with me........

HARPER'S GOT TO GO, HARPER'S GOT TO GO, HARPER'S GOT TO GO, HARPER'S GOT TO GO, HARPER'S GOT TO GO, HARPER'S GOT TO GO, HARPER'S GOT TO GO, HARPER'S GOT TO GO,
 
Back
Top Bottom