oldguyzer said:
The original posting of those photos was exposed as a photoshop edit to make them look worse than they are without makeup.
Quite possible.
However, if the originals are photoshopped they forgot to do Samantha Saint #5 & Madison Ivy #37, who are beautiful both ways IMHO. Allie Haze #9 is really cute without makeup but smoking with it & Sierra Sanders #50 doesn't look much different either way, as do many others, including myself, making dreamblade correct that most women don't look that different. Generally, if you find her attractive with makeup you'll most likely find her attractive without it.
That being said, as in real life, some of these ladies definitely look much better with makeup than without as it seems to really enhance their faces. I've known women who look better without makeup than with, but you'll be hard pressed to convince them of it. Like I said earlier, I fall into the "not that much difference" category, but I've never had a professional makeup artist do my makeup. Who knows, maybe with the right lighting, camera angles, etc. I'd look absolutely smoking too, but I'm just not willing to go to such lengths to supposedly enhance my looks or to impress others, etc. Frankly I can't justify the time and money spent doing so.
My point is that photos like these make a lot of everyday women feel inadequate. It's nice to see that porn stars and celebrities alike are human like the rest of us when off camera or out of the spotlight. I also feel that when men are rating us on our looks, etc. they shouldn't compare us to these unrealistic ideals, as maybe the object of their fantasies isn't half as good looking in reality as they think. Is it photoshopping or do some of them have bad skin due to wearing so much gunk on their faces every day? SB, this could explain why the facials aren't necessarily working.
