IN-Call Quick Review/Warning: Jennifer @ Maximum

[elassowipo1]

I'll keep this one relatively short.

Saw her based on a positive review on another site. Have been pretty lucky with TOFTT for the past year, but I guess the streak couldn't last forever.

Looked ok when I first walked into the room (she had a dress on), a bit older than the pics suggest but still doable (I'm guessing over 30 at least), so I went in for a shower. When her clothes came off though it was disappointing though. Very loose and saggy in the midsection, obvious signs of childbirth, no appealing at all. Legs and breasts weren't bad however, skin actually quite smooth. At that point I was already naked on the bed and she was going down to give me a BJ, so it was pretty much the point of no return, LOL.

FS was actually pretty good though, not mechanical at all, very vocal, she seemed pretty horny. Finished with a CIM. Gave it to her pretty hard and fast and she seemed to like it. Did most of it in doggy as the view was a bit better from that vantage point. Service was decent but I couldn't get over the body. I've seen enough girls to know that they don't always look as good as the pics, but this is one of those situations where the divergence was beyond what I would consider reasonable. Good thing I only booked for a 1/2 hr so downside was somewhat limited.

 

[Jawbone]

Thank you for your honesty. It's nice to see real reviews. The service end of it the lady seemed to have done a good job. I am sure there will be some that don't mind a mummy tummy, but for some it's a session that can be passed on and money saved.

Good informative review!:great:

 

[Kirk Lazarus]

Thanks for the review and info elassowipo. I find that this agency's euro imports always look better in pics than in person. Their "homegrown" talent have more accurate pics because I think that the agency takes those pics themselves as opposed to the euro girls who submit their glammed up photos that may be outdated and set wrong expectations.

 

[Dan]

Thanks for the heads up!

 

[Bear669]

Thanks!

Thanks!

I'll keep this one relatively short.

Saw her based on a positive review on another site. Have been pretty lucky with TOFTT for the past year, but I guess the streak couldn't last forever.

Looked ok when I first walked into the room (she had a dress on), a bit older than the pics suggest

Beauty face pics, are they real despite age difference?

but still doable (I'm guessing over 30 at least), so I went in for a shower. When her clothes came off though it was disappointing though. Very loose and saggy in the midsection, obvious signs of childbirth

:neutral: Couldnt care less

, no appealing at all. Legs and breasts weren't bad however, skin actually quite smooth

YUM!

At that point I was already naked on the bed and she was going down to give me a BJ, so it was pretty much the point of no return, LOL.

FS was actually pretty good though, not mechanical at all, very vocal, she seemed pretty horny

:great::great:

. Finished with a CIM. Gave it to her pretty hard and fast and she seemed to like it

:great::great:

. Did most of it in doggy as the view was a bit better from that vantage point. Service was decent but I couldn't get over the body. I've seen enough girls to know that they don't always look as good as the pics, but this is one of those situations where the divergence was beyond what I would consider reasonable. Good thing I only booked for a 1/2 hr so downside was somewhat limited.

Great example, 'one man's poison is another man's meat' .

VERRY good review for all of us. If I win the Lotto tonight, she is on the TDL!

 

[sycophant]

thank you wipo.

 

[Winslow]

Thanks for the honest review and warning EW.

 

[shred]

Thanks for the review and info elassowipo. I find that this agency's euro imports always look better in pics than in person. Their "homegrown" talent have more accurate pics because I think that the agency takes those pics themselves as opposed to the euro girls who submit their glammed up photos that may be outdated and set wrong expectations.

Don't they confirm the pictures? I mean at least they meet with ladies before post their pics don't they?

 

[elassowipo1]

Great example, 'one man's poison is another man's meat' .

VERRY good review for all of us. If I win the Lotto tonight, she is on the TDL!

I understand your point Bear and indeed I can see some other hobbyists having a great time with her.

My main point of contention was the huge discrepancy between what was advertised and what I saw in person. The difference is beyond what I would consider reasonable for a legitimate agency, as to almost border on B&S (a practice I don't think anyone here condones).

 

[Rahino]

I understand your point Bear and indeed I can see some other hobbyists having a great time with her.

My main point of contention was the huge discrepancy between what was advertised and what I saw in person. The difference is beyond what I would consider reasonable for a legitimate agency, as to almost border on B&S (a practice I don't think anyone here condones).

I think Maximum is around long enough to discharge B&S accusations. I think it was just a mispresentation and it came from the lady, not from the agency. But I do agree the agency must confirm the picture's validation.

 

[Limenti]

Sorry to hear about your experience wipo. I know exactly how it feels when you look at the pictures which are overly done with photoshop and when you face to reality. It is not very pleasant feeling.

 

[ChrisD]

I tend to go with more home grown pics too. There are certainly a litany of B&S pics out there, but I think we may be kidding ourselves to think that all pics are 100% representative of the girl herself. There are tats that are blended, other distinguising marks and even some body jewelry is blended out; but to morph the body shape is misrepresentative.

I'm glad you at least salvaged enough to have a decent time though and thank you for the honest review. More needed like this.

 

[Nova5]

Wipo, thanks for the information regarding Jennifer @ Maximum, greatly appreciated.

 

[elassowipo1]

Yea as a relatively experienced hobbyist, I probably should have known better. I've had good success with the locally recruited girls from this agency that are listed between 19-21 yrs, so I think I'll just stick with a formula that works.

 

[Wilsonjso]

Thanks for the review and heads up Wipo. Very appreciated your info. :great:

 

[maverick]

Yea as a relatively experienced hobbyist, I probably should have known better. I've had good success with the locally recruited girls from this agency that are listed between 19-21 yrs, so I think I'll just stick with a formula that works.

i was thinking of seeing jennifer from the pics and although the pics look tgtbt, max hasn't been known as a B&S, your review has got me re-thinking the TDL.

so thanks for the warning.

 

[justme74]

I saw a visiting EE girl at Maximum while back. He pictures were overly done as well. Thanks for the review and warning Elassowipo

 

[Bear669]

And your comments on my Q about her face?

And your comments on my Q about her face?

I understand your point Bear and indeed I can see some other hobbyists having a great time with her.

My main point of contention was the huge discrepancy between what was advertised and what I saw in person. The difference is beyond what I would consider reasonable for a legitimate agency, as to almost border on B&S (a practice I don't think anyone here condones).

.. or from another POV, how would you have rated if ad had stated "Early 30's..." ?:neutral:

 

[elassowipo1]

Bear - I actually thought she looked good facially, if only a bit mature for my tastes. Not as good as the professional pics obviously but good enough that I didn't opt to leave when the door opened.

They have a new pic of her posted. Her tummy is covered up but as I said earlier, she doesn't look bad facially (a bit more makeup than when I saw her) and she does have a nice pair of legs.

 

[Braydon]

Very good informative review Wipo. Thanks.