T
TINY
Guest
- Thread starter
- #22
My mother always said no dick will ever rule her or her kids. Why she got married a few times.
You're right......and she should be locked up too....
btw:
" I know that God has forgiven me for what has happened and this is all part of his plan for me"
Bull fucking shit.......she said this and they still let her off with a smack on the wrist? This is why I don't believe in religion.......in her mind, she's forgiven so no matter what the legal system does to her, it won't matter TO HER. What's to stop her from doing it again and then again, being forgiven?
I'd like to hear baz's ideas on this..........
ChaosTheory
Reviewer
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2010
- Messages
- 2,346
Extremely disturbing.
Kim Kardashians Mom must be like "so what is wrong with that?"
(apparently she did distribute and allow distribution of the video and some say she even did reshoot because the scenes werent hot enough. lol)
Kim Kardashians Mom must be like "so what is wrong with that?"
(apparently she did distribute and allow distribution of the video and some say she even did reshoot because the scenes werent hot enough. lol)
B
Boing
Guest
- Thread starter
- #26
What do you guys think. She gets to keep her kids when she gets out of jail?.
Maurice Boscorelli
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2010
- Messages
- 19,322
I don't know where the father is in all this but he should be awarded sole custody permanently.
That's for starters.
Next she should be sentenced the same as a pedophile.
And I believe that pedos should get 25 year sentences with no chance of early release.
That's for starters.
Next she should be sentenced the same as a pedophile.
And I believe that pedos should get 25 year sentences with no chance of early release.
Madman
Reviewer
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2011
- Messages
- 17,534
She's disgusting and should be punished along with the men who received the pics if they had requested them or knew what she was doing prior to receiving them.
I do have a concern over this statement.
She was caught doing the same with a Toronto man a year ago when Toronto Police Service's sex crimes unit intercepted instant messaging which contained highly “sexualized” language considered child pornography, said Crown attorney Paul Larsh.
I'm happy she was caught and is going to be jailed but I don't like the thought of my privacy being compromised and personal messages viewed by anyone except the intended recipient. An officer is not allowed to go through one's mailbox and read their mail, are not allowed to stop the letter carrier and demand one's male, WHY ARE THEY allowed to read peoples private messages?
I do have a concern over this statement.
She was caught doing the same with a Toronto man a year ago when Toronto Police Service's sex crimes unit intercepted instant messaging which contained highly “sexualized” language considered child pornography, said Crown attorney Paul Larsh.
I'm happy she was caught and is going to be jailed but I don't like the thought of my privacy being compromised and personal messages viewed by anyone except the intended recipient. An officer is not allowed to go through one's mailbox and read their mail, are not allowed to stop the letter carrier and demand one's male, WHY ARE THEY allowed to read peoples private messages?
I concur.
Would you work fo Google looking at the worst in the internet?.
Would you work fo Google looking at the worst in the internet?.
The worst job at Google: hunting for child porn, beheading videos
Would you work fo Google looking at the worst in the internet?.
The worst job at Google: hunting for child porn, beheading videos
"Bestiality, necrophilia…body mutilations… explicit fetishes (like diaper porn)" are just a few of the things a Google employee saw while monitoring the company's products for unsavory content, according to a piece at BuzzFeed FWD.
The employee says Google usually hires contractors to those positions, so workers are offered no benefits or emotional support to unwind from the twisted sights wrought by the Internet."Child porn is the biggest thing for tech companies," writes the employee. US law dictates it must be taken down within 24 hours of notice and reported to federal authorities.
Unsurprisingly, the position responsible for tracking, verification, and removal of such material isn't a coveted one on the Google campus. According to the piece at FWD, Google commonly hires people to do that dirty work on contracts of a year or less; they have the potential to be hired full-time after that, but many are simply cut loose.The author of the piece notes that Google covered one session of therapy, and encouraged him to continue attending (without Google's financial support).
But after nine months on the contract, the author was told his contract would expire, rather than roll into a full-time position. While the lack of support for employees traversing the darkest corners of the Internet is disturbing, we wouldn't wish an open-ended full-time job in that field on our worst foes.
https://arstechnica.com/business/20...ogle-hunting-for-child-porn-beheading-videos/
The employee says Google usually hires contractors to those positions, so workers are offered no benefits or emotional support to unwind from the twisted sights wrought by the Internet."Child porn is the biggest thing for tech companies," writes the employee. US law dictates it must be taken down within 24 hours of notice and reported to federal authorities.
Unsurprisingly, the position responsible for tracking, verification, and removal of such material isn't a coveted one on the Google campus. According to the piece at FWD, Google commonly hires people to do that dirty work on contracts of a year or less; they have the potential to be hired full-time after that, but many are simply cut loose.The author of the piece notes that Google covered one session of therapy, and encouraged him to continue attending (without Google's financial support).
But after nine months on the contract, the author was told his contract would expire, rather than roll into a full-time position. While the lack of support for employees traversing the darkest corners of the Internet is disturbing, we wouldn't wish an open-ended full-time job in that field on our worst foes.
https://arstechnica.com/business/20...ogle-hunting-for-child-porn-beheading-videos/
Absolutely not. I work with tech who used to be with the OPP. His last post involved monitoring porn and kiddie porn. He lasted 7 months, and that was with counselling.
I believing in being informed and aware. But I see no need to be exposed to pure evil.
I believing in being informed and aware. But I see no need to be exposed to pure evil.
D
DannyDeVito
Guest
- Thread starter
- #34
No amount of money will make me ever take a job like that. Maybe we should give those jobs to the criminals in jail. Let them pay their keep.
There are also the social workers that are exposed to child and women abuse that constantly keep needing counselling.
Don't forget that there are many police officers that have drama attacks days after they witness wrong doings to the weak.
W
Wanker
Guest
- Thread starter
- #37
Nope.
P
Prick
Guest
- Thread starter
- #38
Paedophile babysitter Red Saunders jailed for raping girl
Paedophile babysitter Red Saunders jailed for raping girl
Who wants to have the first crack on this piece of shit.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-20470501
A photography student who posed as a babysitter and filmed himself abusing girls has been jailed for life.
Red Saunders, 23, tricked the parents of two girls, then aged six and eight, into allowing him to spend hours "playing games" with them.
Saunders, of Merstham in Redhill, Surrey, was told he would have to serve a minimum of eight years in prison for the rape of the eight-year-old.
The Old Bailey judge said Saunders was so dangerous be may never be released.
Saunders was able to get access to children despite being placed on the sex offenders register in 2005.
Babysitter advertHe pleaded guilty to 24 charges, including raping the eight-year-old girl, sexual assault, inciting children to engage in sexual activity and making and possessing indecent images of children.
He had taken more than 4,000 videos and photographs of young girls.
Saunders had advertised as a babysitter and abused the two girls after their parents placed adverts on the Gumtree website.
Edward Lucas for the prosecution, told the court: "He employed his charm and guile in order to obtain one-to-one contact with both these little girls."
Mr Lucas said the older girl complained to her parents, and police found images of him abusing one of the girls when they raided his home.
Police also found that he had been filming girls in parks and other public places and editing the footage with child porn.
There was also an "abduction diary" setting out how to abduct little girls, abuse them and then kill them and dispose of their bodies.
Judge Peter Rook told Saunders: "You are obsessed with young girls.
"You have acted out your sexual fantasies. Your conduct amounts to every parent's nightmare."
'Depraved interest'In 2005, Saunders was convicted of a sexual assault after photographing a five-year-old girl at a gym where he was working as a party organiser.
A two-year supervision order involving sessions with a psychologist was imposed by South East Surrey juvenile court and he was put on the sex offenders register for five years.
Surrey Social Services said he had a "depraved interested" and his fantasies included abducting a seven-year-old girl.
During the trial at the Old Bailey, prosecutor, Mr Lucas said he did not understand why nothing was done in 2005.
"I just can't believe what has occurred," he said.
"In 2005, a full investigation, including a psychological report, was carried out independent of the sentencing exercise.
"I am staggered from what I have read and nothing was done in 2005. He has been left free to do it again."
Paedophile babysitter Red Saunders jailed for raping girl
Who wants to have the first crack on this piece of shit.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-20470501
A photography student who posed as a babysitter and filmed himself abusing girls has been jailed for life.
Red Saunders, 23, tricked the parents of two girls, then aged six and eight, into allowing him to spend hours "playing games" with them.
Saunders, of Merstham in Redhill, Surrey, was told he would have to serve a minimum of eight years in prison for the rape of the eight-year-old.
The Old Bailey judge said Saunders was so dangerous be may never be released.
Saunders was able to get access to children despite being placed on the sex offenders register in 2005.
Babysitter advertHe pleaded guilty to 24 charges, including raping the eight-year-old girl, sexual assault, inciting children to engage in sexual activity and making and possessing indecent images of children.
He had taken more than 4,000 videos and photographs of young girls.
Saunders had advertised as a babysitter and abused the two girls after their parents placed adverts on the Gumtree website.
Edward Lucas for the prosecution, told the court: "He employed his charm and guile in order to obtain one-to-one contact with both these little girls."
Mr Lucas said the older girl complained to her parents, and police found images of him abusing one of the girls when they raided his home.
Police also found that he had been filming girls in parks and other public places and editing the footage with child porn.
There was also an "abduction diary" setting out how to abduct little girls, abuse them and then kill them and dispose of their bodies.
Judge Peter Rook told Saunders: "You are obsessed with young girls.
"You have acted out your sexual fantasies. Your conduct amounts to every parent's nightmare."
'Depraved interest'In 2005, Saunders was convicted of a sexual assault after photographing a five-year-old girl at a gym where he was working as a party organiser.
A two-year supervision order involving sessions with a psychologist was imposed by South East Surrey juvenile court and he was put on the sex offenders register for five years.
Surrey Social Services said he had a "depraved interested" and his fantasies included abducting a seven-year-old girl.
During the trial at the Old Bailey, prosecutor, Mr Lucas said he did not understand why nothing was done in 2005.
"I just can't believe what has occurred," he said.
"In 2005, a full investigation, including a psychological report, was carried out independent of the sentencing exercise.
"I am staggered from what I have read and nothing was done in 2005. He has been left free to do it again."
Similar threads
