Made with Love

IN-Call Review: Indy CatherineTog

  • Thread starter Thread starter celticman
  • Start date Start date
C

celticman

Guest
I visited Catherine during the week. She is located at Yonge and Sheppard which is overly convenient to my office :eek: . I walked out of work, crossed Yonge Street, and was at Catherine’s high end condo in 3 minutes. Catherine has been around for a long time. She is well reviewed elsewhere, and I do not recall a single negative comment. Her rates are reasonable and I think that she has an overnight for $600, although that is not for me.

The web pictures, for me, convey an impression of a somewhat younger woman, although I was not disappointed. Certainly not bait and switch. I have seen wildly varying estimates of her age, but my dime on it is 40ish. The arrangements were completely smooth. Texting was quick, informative and no hitches. Catherine does not like all of the gory details in a review, so I will be brief. When I entered the apartment, she was dressed in the usual skimpy lingerie, and immediately launched into DFK. We had a very passionate session that went from BBBJ to MPOS. I did not partake, but rimming and greek are available. Catherine is a fascinating woman with a lot of life experience. She is really easy to be with and to make a connection. I had a good time, and this was not my first visit, so there is the answer to the repeat question :)
 
So when are you moving in? Purely to save the commute time to the office, of course.
 
Saw her myself last summer. I concur with celticman's review. Quite a passionate lady, everything was on the menu.
 
Oldguyzer, you may need to get your hands on a defibrillator. Maybe keep it on a hydro pole in the Yonge and Sheppard area.

CM is on a rampage, awesome dude!Praise-Bowing
 
Raiden said:
Oldguyzer, you may need to get your hands on a defibrillator. Maybe keep it on a hydro pole in the Yonge and Sheppard area.

CM is on a rampage, awesome dude!Praise-Bowing

I need the defib because of jealousy..... :SayWhat?:
 
Amigo you are you cheating your kid's inheritance /-Thumbs-up::/.

Keep up the good work :biggrin2:
 
celticman said:
I visited Catherine during the week. She is located at Yonge and Sheppard which is overly convenient to my office :eek: . I walked out of work, crossed Yonge Street, and was at Catherine’s high end condo in 3 minutes. Catherine has been around for a long time. She is well reviewed elsewhere, and I do not recall a single negative comment. Her rates are reasonable and I think that she has an overnight for $600, although that is not for me.

The web pictures, for me, convey an impression of a somewhat younger woman, although I was not disappointed. Certainly not bait and switch. I have seen wildly varying estimates of her age, but my dime on it is 40ish. The arrangements were completely smooth. Texting was quick, informative and no hitches. Catherine does not like all of the gory details in a review, so I will be brief. When I entered the apartment, she was dressed in the usual skimpy lingerie, and immediately launched into DFK. We had a very passionate session that went from BBBJ to MPOS. I did not partake, but rimming and greek are available. Catherine is a fascinating woman with a lot of life experience. She is really easy to be with and to make a connection. I had a good time, and this was not my first visit, so there is the answer to the repeat question :)

Your comments and reviews are always so suspicious, read like an ad. You were not disappointed by her pics and how she looked in person, yet you've seen her before.:-Cool/"
 
Your comments and reviews are always so suspicious, read like an ad. You were not disappointed by her pics and how she looked in person, yet you've seen her before.:-Cool/"

This coming from a guy who gives no evidence in his posts of seeing an escort, let alone posting a review. No sex drive? No money? If the latter, PM me and I will treat you. If the former, sucks to be you

In that you lack the intellect to connect simple dots, let me explain the pics. They seem to show a more attractive person than Catherine in the flesh. Catherine in the flesh is still attractive therefore not a disappointment. As indicated by a few other posts (that’s the bit about connecting the dots numbnuts).

As for sounding like an ad, one of my degrees is English lit. I think of the written word as an artform. I suspect that a knuckledragger like you would not only not recognise that, but uses the language more like a battering ram.

One of the problems with sharing via reviews is snakes like you with your nihilistic snide comments.

Your posting history suggests a small man lacking in charachter with nothing meaningful to contribute.

Go fuck yourself.
 
This coming from a guy who gives no evidence in his posts of seeing an escort, let alone posting a review. No sex drive? No money? If the latter, PM me and I will treat you. If the former, sucks to be you

In that you lack the intellect to connect simple dots, let me explain the pics. They seem to show a more attractive person than Catherine in the flesh. Catherine in the flesh is still attractive therefore not a disappointment. As indicated by a few other posts (that’s the bit about connecting the dots numbnuts).

As for sounding like an ad, one of my degrees is English lit. I think of the written word as an artform. I suspect that a knuckledragger like you would not only not recognise that, but uses the language more like a battering ram.

One of the problems with sharing via reviews is snakes like you with your nihilistic snide comments.

Your posting history suggests a small man lacking in charachter with nothing meaningful to contribute.

Go fuck yourself.

Your defensive stance only confirms my suspicion. I read the other board regularily, you're just so suspicious with everything you write, mostly because of WK'ing. Just my observations. You must have finished near the bottom of the class.:biggrin2::YMAPPLAUSE::Crying2::rofl!::shout:
 
This coming from a guy who gives no evidence in his posts of seeing an escort, let alone posting a review. No sex drive? No money? If the latter, PM me and I will treat you. If the former, sucks to be you

In that you lack the intellect to connect simple dots, let me explain the pics. They seem to show a more attractive person than Catherine in the flesh. Catherine in the flesh is still attractive therefore not a disappointment. As indicated by a few other posts (that’s the bit about connecting the dots numbnuts).

As for sounding like an ad, one of my degrees is English lit. I think of the written word as an artform. I suspect that a knuckledragger like you would not only not recognise that, but uses the language more like a battering ram.

One of the problems with sharing via reviews is snakes like you with your nihilistic snide comments.

Your posting history suggests a small man lacking in charachter with nothing meaningful to contribute.

Go fuck yourself.

You swore! tsk tsk
Ps. I saw her a few years ago and her pictures do not match her well. Maybe they were taken during her younger years. So she is quite older but I do concur that her menu was quite extensive. Met her in the Harbourfront area.
 
Your defensive stance only confirms my suspicion. I read the other board regularily, you're just so suspicious with everything you write, mostly because of WK'ing. Just my observations. You must have finished near the bottom of the class.:biggrin2::YMAPPLAUSE::Crying2::rofl!::shout:

Snake,
Having met him personally as well as quite a few of the ladies he's seen, I can vouch for his reviews.

Why you even considered that only his reviews are an "ad" is beyond me as every single review that is posted is an advertisement for a lady.

Putting people down is not a contribution to the board's agenda so I suggest you swallow your pride and make an effort to contribute, not put down.


Celticman, I expected better from a gentleman of your caliber. Don't go into the trenches to defend yourself, other reviewers will confirm and have confirmed many of your observations.


thesun, yes I agree with the fact that Catherine's pics are a few years old and yes her old incall was on Queens Quay. She still has quite the following from what I've seen. Nice lady too :)
 
This coming from a guy who gives no evidence in his posts of seeing an escort, let alone posting a review. No sex drive? No money? If the latter, PM me and I will treat you. If the former, sucks to be you

given that he's probably not going to get your money..

can i take his place....:Praying:
 
given that he's probably not going to get your money..

can i take his place....:Praying:

But you would have to sink to his level first. So I am sure you would not sell your soul for a few grubby pieces of silver :)
 
Snake,


Celticman, I expected better from a gentleman of your caliber.


Sheik, I appreciate your comments supporting the authenticity of my experiences in this hobby. BUT. These boards have a fair degree of rough and tumble on them. As well as controvery, foul language of the worst kind, and the cut and thrust of sincere debate. I accept that, although some parts of it I could do without. That said, if there is an inference from a member suggesting a lack of forthrightness on my part I will be taking an uncompromising approach to it. Especially from a member like snake who has no indication of being in the hobby or contributing to HUBGFE. And I am not looking for approval or an assessment of my qualities as a gentleman, or a lack thereof.
 
Your defensive stance only confirms my suspicion. I read the other board regularily, you're just so suspicious with everything you write, mostly because of WK'ing. Just my observations. You must have finished near the bottom of the class.:biggrin2::YMAPPLAUSE::Crying2::rofl!::shout:

An old handle wants to play :NoNoNo:

Dude you mind going back to myshit site. Oh forgot it got shut down.

Have you ever heard the expression FO??
 
Back
Top Bottom