Unfortunately, it's a very small % by comparison to the overall constituency, and you need to look at both who wrote the review, and who they were supposedly 'flirting' with, and what constitutes actual 'flirting'. :-Cool/"
I agree Twitter is definitely a strong positive, emerging medium to connect to providers, and the frequency of posted selfies is very appealing as a screening tool for hobbyists looking for realistic portrayals of physical attributes prior to booking.
Personally though, I find it funny when a provider frequently posts naked selfies, and has 2K-10K followers, but guys write reviews about 'she was flirting with them'. Ahem. Yeah, among her 10K followers, you must be someone REALLY important to her! :Bonehead:
Truth is, it takes the most skilled, Twitter present providers less than 3 secs of effort to slip a brass ring through the nose of a gullible hobbyist with nothing more than a generic "Thanks Hun!" + <Smiley Face> emoticon in response to some lame, pandering remark they've posted. Then, they wriggle a little finger and tug gently on the rings, and all the suckers come running.
Twitter is just another marketing tool that enables providers to convince consumers to buy. It is no more honest or sincere a vehicle than any other traditional form of marketing/advertising, used to promote and sell any/all mainstream products or services.
The old adage remains the same: Caveat Emptor (loosely translated for lay people: don't be a sucker!)
