Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
papasmerf said:Sure why not?
Hell flex start for everyone.
Especially Doctors and Surgons
ROBERTSON said:Agreed, but I think we should add fireman, ambulance drivers, cops, airline pilots, just to name a few.
nntsci said:what the hell... no... (speaking as one)... what we need to get off our asses and walk, jog, run for the buss, bike and more generally make rush hour a work out. (I walk instead of taking the subway).
best way to deal with anxiety is exercise
Jessica Rain said:WTF does obesiety have to do with anxiety in rush hour. I get anxiety. I get obesity. I don't get the link between the two.
Anyway, my opinion is known on this. I don't agree with special accommodations for those with obesiety. I just don't.
Now those with anxiety that truly suffer, as it is a mental illness, and one I know very well, I would love to see employers be more flexible with regards to hours, breaks, or just anything that relates to needed support.
Same with those suffering Bi-Polar. Sadly I know a few employers who love to take advantage of a person manic phases. Letting them work all hours of the day and night, but when they crash or the depressive phase hits, there is no support when the person just can't even get out of bed.
More needs to to be done in all areas for those with mental health. Having said that, you come in later, you stay later. Making things flexible does not mean making special accommodations in a way that create an unequal working environment.
Jessica Rain said:WTF does obesiety have to do with anxiety in rush hour. I get anxiety. I get obesity. I don't get the link between the two.
LadyJacklyn said:Why would heavier people (I wont use obese because I suspect they are using it incorrectly here) need to travel at different times?
Jessica Rain said:Now those with anxiety that truly suffer, as it is a mental illness, and one I know very well, I would love to see employers be more flexible with regards to hours, breaks, or just anything that relates to needed support.
.
Maurice Boscorelli said:Most health care professionals that I know would disagree with you on your statement. Here's an excerpt for the boards amusement.
.''So… Is anxiety a mental illness?
Research and treatment protocols have stated the answer. In short, anxiety is NOT a mental disorder that needs to have thorough treatment. Instead, it is the result of day-to-day factors that aggravate a behavior and particular ways of thinking in an individual.
This behavioral issue can be treated by implementing behavioral modifications, vigilant support and sometimes, pharmacological relaxants. People suffering from anxiety shouldn’t worry about suffering from an irreversible disease.
Anxiety is readily reversible, you just need to have the right state of mind and added encouragement to reverse it.''
Anxiety disorders are different, though. They are a group of mental illnesses, and the distress they cause can keep you from carrying on with your life normally.
Jessica Rain said:WTF does obesiety have to do with anxiety in rush hour. I get anxiety. I get obesity. I don't get the link between the two.
Anyway, my opinion is known on this. I don't agree with special accommodations for those with obesiety. I just don't.
Now those with anxiety that truly suffer, as it is a mental illness, and one I know very well, I would love to see employers be more flexible with regards to hours, breaks, or just anything that relates to needed support.
Same with those suffering Bi-Polar. Sadly I know a few employers who love to take advantage of a person manic phases. Letting them work all hours of the day and night, but when they crash or the depressive phase hits, there is no support when the person just can't even get out of bed.
More needs to to be done in all areas for those with mental health. Having said that, you come in later, you stay later. Making things flexible does not mean making special accommodations in a way that create an unequal working environment.
LadyJacklyn said:Toronto rush hour is pretty much all day.
Prim0 said:How about this.....
Let's turn it around and ignore the personal issues of race, creed, color, health, etc.
An employer needs someone to do a job. They'll state what conditions go with that job (ie. hours to be worked, tasks to be completed, conditions in which that work is done, etc.). Now, either a person can do that job or not. If they cannot, so be it. They need to find another job. If they can do the job and accept the conditions, then that's it. Do the tasks and you get to keep the job. If at some point, you can no longer complete the tasks, don't be surprised if you lose the job.
So if someone is too fat, too anxious, too weak, too uneducated, too shy, too loud, too whatever, then they don't get the job or they eventually lose the job. It's not racism, misogyny, or any other bias than that the employer needs the tasks completed and if the employee can't complete them, they have to go. You wouldn't keep paying for a plumber to come to your house if he could never fully fix the plumbing issue. You wouldn't keep going to an SP that didn't take care of your needs.
Why all of this "feeling" that people who cannot do something (for whatever reason) should be allowed to keep the job of doing that something. Why force employers to pay people who cannot do the tasks that are needed within the conditions that exist? It's not evil or greed....if the business doesn't get its tasks completed, it goes out of business. If it goes out of business, then others lose jobs, capital is lost, tax revenues go down, etc. All of this because someone's feelings might get hurt if they can't do a task and are actually told that they can't do the task.