Made with Love

Talk about bad luck.

McGuinty

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
2,033
A man released 23 years after he was wrongly convicted for the 1991 murder of a New York rabbi suffered a heart attack on his second day as a free man, his attorney confirmed to NBC News.
David Ranta was hospitalized after the heart attack, attorney Pierre Sussman said. The man's heart attack was first reported by the New York Times.

“On Friday evening, David Renta suffered a heart attack. My office is happy to report that he’s been stabilized and is being treated in cardiac intensive care at a metropolitan hospital,” Sussman said in a written statement. “He is presently resting, with his family by his bedside. We will continue to ensure that David receives the required, ongoing medical attention he needs.”

Ranta, 58, spent more than two decades in jail after he was found guilty of killing Hasidic rabbi Chaskel Werzberger. A lengthy review of his case ended with prosecutors admitting that the case against Ranta had fallen apart over the years. He was freed at a Brooklyn courthouse on Thursday.

“The accumulated trauma of being falsely convicted and incarcerated for 23 years, coupled with the intense emotions experienced surrounding his release, has had a profound impact on his health,” Sussman said in the statement.

Long-pent emotions welled for relatives when the judge vacated Ranta’s sentence. The man's pregnant daughter, who was two years old when he was jailed, were among those present.
“Sir, you are free to go,” acting state Supreme Court Justice Miriam Cyrulnik said at the Brooklyn courthouse.

“The evidence no longer establishes the defendant’s guilt is beyond a reasonable doubt,” Assistant District Attorney John O’Mara told Reuters.

“I’m overwhelmed,” Ranta told reporters after being cleared. “Right now, I feel like I’m under water, swimming.”

https://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/20...eed-man-suffers-heart-attack-a-day-later?lite

 
SHit (ooops I swore!), I just read about him about 2 Sundays ago via the New York Times. I hope he is ok.
 
SHit (ooops I swore!), I just read about him about 2 Sundays ago via the New York Times. I hope he is ok.

It is really sad for the guy. Very traumatic and totally understandable why he would suffer the way he did. I hope this gets put into his lawsuit against the police department.

BTW, it was not me who started the swearing thread, and I never said there was anything wrong with it. Nice try on the jab. Do you always fail this often? Nevermind, not going to let you degrade this thread with your crap. Move it along to another thread.
 

. . . Bevermind . . .

You'll need to explain this one for me, my dear.

I have been accused on occasion of having beaver on my mind, and rightly so, but I don't have a clue about this "bever" of which you speak. :biggrin2:
 
You'll need to explain this one for me, my dear.

I have been accused on occasion of having beaver on my mind, and rightly so, but I don't have a clue about this "bever" of which you speak. :biggrin2:

Hehehe, better to nevermind = Bevermind.

Come on now. You should have gotten that. Mister word smith. LOL

Back to the topic however, I do have to ask and maybe a lawyer on this board can help. Would this heart attack add to the amount of possible damages he could seek.

I know for my suit, since I now require an additional surgery, it has jumped me into another bracket of possible damages I can seek.

I just wonder if it is would be hard to prove or would they have to prove the heart attack was related, even though it would 100% appear to the case.
 
It would have been truly bad luck if he had died on his second day as a free man.

That brings up another question. If he did die, which I am truly glad he didn't, could his family sue for the loss of their family member for so many years and then due to his heart attack, losing him for life?

I know I ma asking lots of questions, I really do feel for him and his family. The whole thing is complete mess. He will never be the same. No amount of therapy is going to be able to put him back to his mind set before he spent all that time in jail.

 
That brings up another question. If he did die, which I am truly glad he didn't, could his family sue for the loss of their family member for so many years and then due to his heart attack, losing him for life?


I would think so but they would have a tough time proving he didn't have a pre-existing condition that attributed to this heart attack. On it's face they could argue the merits......oh who am I kidding I'm a cleric not a lawyer.
 
I would think so but they would have a tough time proving he didn't have a pre-existing condition that attributed to this heart attack. On it's face they could argue the merits......oh who am I kidding I'm a cleric not a lawyer.

I don't know. With him spending so much time in jail, his medical records would be there and the fact that he spent that time in conditions he would not normally have suffered, anything that did stem from being in jail would still be the fault of the police, and courts that put him there.

Who is the lawyer on this board? We need answer.
 
I'm not a lawyer, but FF's question made me curious. I found this


In 1984, New York State passed the Court of Claims Act, which found that innocent people who were wrongly convicted of crimes and subsequently imprisoned were frustrated in seeking legal redress due to a variety of substantive and technical obstacles in the law. By enacting the Court of Claims Act, also known as the Unjust Conviction and Imprisonment Act of 1984, the legislature intends that “those innocent persons who can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that they were unjustly convicted and imprisoned be able to recover damages against the state.”

In order to present a claim for unjust conviction and imprisonment and successfully recover damages from the state, a claimant must provide certain evidence under the act. First, a claimant must establish clear and convincing evidence that “he has been convicted of one or more felonies or misdemeanors against the state and subsequently sentenced to a term of imprisonment, and has served all or any part of the sentence.” Next, he must prove “he has been pardoned upon the ground of innocence of the crime or crimes for which he was sentenced and which are the grounds for the complaint.” In addition, the claim cannot be time-barred, meaning the claimant must have filed the complaint within two years after the pardon. Lastly, the claimant must demonstrate that he did not bring about his conviction by his own conduct. After the claimant has presented the evidence, “if the court finds that the claimant is entitled to a judgment, it shall award damages in such sum of money as the court determines will fairly and reasonably compensate him.”




It's not clear from the OP if he has been officially pardoned, it seems that would have to happen before he could file a claim for the wrongful conviction. I'm not sure if his claim would be against the police, unless they manufactured evidence, or against the state itself.
 
Regarding:
It's not clear from the OP if he has been officially pardoned, it seems that would have to happen before he could file a claim for the wrongful conviction. I'm not sure if his claim would be against the police, unless they manufactured evidence, or against the state itself.

I know it is difficult to believe everything what you read from the newspapers, but if it is true regarding how the state/police presented evidence against David (it was an article from New York Times 2 Sundays ago), I hope he gets everything he deserves. Yet he has lost so many years and no money will ever be enough to replace them.
 
(b) (i) he has been pardoned upon the ground of innocence of the crime or crimes for

which he was sentenced and which are the grounds for the complaint; or (ii) his
judgment of conviction was reversed or vacated, and the accusatory instrument

dismissed or, if a new trial was ordered, either he was found not guilty at the new trial or
he was not retried and the accusatory instrument dismissed; provided that the
judgement of conviction was reversed or vacated, and the accusatory instrument was
dismissed, on any of the following grounds: (A) paragraph (a), (b), (c),(e) or (g) of

subdivision one of section 440.10 of the criminal procedure law; or (B) subdivision one

(where based upon grounds set forth in item (A) hereof), two, three (where the count
dismissed was the sole basis for the imprisonment complained of) or five of
section 470.20 of the criminal procedure law; or (C) comparable provisions of the former code of

criminal procedure or subsequent law; or (D) the statute, or application thereof, on which

the accusatory instrument was based violated the constitution of the United States or the
state of New York; and



. 8-b.pdf


The full statute seems to say that an official pardon is not required, I should have looked it up in the first place. Sorry, my bad.

Stories like this make me rethink my support for the death penalty.

If there was indeed police/prosecutorial misconduct, I hope he ends up with a big pile of cash. You're right, though, that won't make up for the years he lost.

It's also sad for the family of the murder victim...all these years they thought there had been justice for their loved one, only to find out there wasn't.
 
While inside, he had healthcare coverage.
Does he have it now that he's out?
The irony.
 
Back
Top Bottom