A good call :YMAPPLAUSE:
Toronto councillors want $260,000 grant for Pride parade axed after police ban | Toronto Star
Toronto councillors want $260,000 grant for Pride parade axed after police ban | Toronto Star
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, but wouldn't the City be catering to the police if they remove funding?Thomas Crown said:Removing funding will remind them that catering to one group in an event that is supposed to all inclusive isn't acceptable
Jasper said:Yes, but wouldn't the City be catering to the police if they remove funding?
A few years ago I asked a friend of mine if he was going to gay pride(yes he's gay) he said no we've accomplished what we set out to do. The pride parade has evolved and now includes everyone which to me is great. Its now a calibration and a giant party. kind of like Mardi grasdemien3k5 said:Toronto's Pride festivities deviated from its original mission a very long time ago, and has now morphed into something completely unrecognizable. Makes sense that public funding for this event be scrutinized in a much more serious way. Perhaps by doing do it would allow Pride to move back to its true root cause which still has tremendous public support (and rightfully so)
Thomas Crown said:A few years ago I asked a friend of mine if he was going to gay pride(yes he's gay) he said no we've accomplished what we set out to do. The pride parade has evolved and now includes everyone which to me is great. Its now a calibration and a giant party. kind of like Mardi gras
demien3k5 said:Look, I get it but when Pride was first born, it was a mission critical investment in equality, tolerance, social development and prosperity that could simply not be ignored. Funding something like that with public money really is a no-brainer.
Now if it's devolved into nothing more than a generic celebration in the form of a giant party, and you're a city like Toronto awash in red ink, you really need to ask yourself if you can afford to be in the giant party business, especially on the taxpayers dime and when tolerance and inclusiveness are not being extended equally to all stakeholders.
That feels more like a role to be played by private finance and special interest groups if you ask me.
Thomas Crown said:
It also generates about 286 million in revenue for Toronto. Not bad for a 250k investment. Also if you start bringing in special interest groups they will dictate how its run and turn it into a a for prophet event instead a celebration. The business that make money pay taxes to the city especially the hotels and restaurants. However I agree that if GPA caves into BLM then cut off the funding
Actually the tax revenue is 60 mil. Although I dont know what the expenditures are.demien3k5 said:I see your point, but I think it's important to differentiate between $286M in economic benefit to the GTA vs. $286M of direct revenue to the City of Toronto Corporation proper.
I suspect the direct revenue generated for the City for things like licenses and permits is much less than the $250K cash investment, and in the end when you factor in peripheral costs like police, fire, EMT, public transportation, insurance, and City maintenance, the City comes out a bigger loser than many people understand.
I'm not saying don't do it, but if the City is expected to absorb many of the underlying costs at the expense of taxpayers, the City then needs to at least push harder on seeing a return to Pride's core values and principles, and have a bigger say in policy compliance for the event.
Thomas Crown said:Actually the tax revenue is 60 mil. Although I dont know what the expenditures are.