Made with Love

Touch my daughter and you die.

Macho Man

Senior Member
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
1,309
I love the Sheriff's response.

(CNN) -- A Texas father caught a man sexually assaulting his 4-year-old daughter and punched him in the head repeatedly, killing him, authorities said.
The father was casually acquainted with the alleged abuser, said Lavaca County Sheriff Micah Harmon.

Neither has been publicly identified.

The girl was left inside the family's house during the social gathering, while other members of her family were tending to horses, the sheriff said.
The alleged abuser was known for his horse-grooming abilities, Harmon said.

The father returned to the house, caught the man in the act, and stopped him by striking him in the head several times, Harmon said.
The man was pronounced dead on the scene, while the daughter was taken to a local hospital in Victoria, Texas, for examinations before being released.

The incident took place Saturday. Harmon described the girl as "OK besides the obvious mental trauma."

Asked whether they would press charges against the father, the sheriff responded, "You have a right to defend your daughter. He acted in defense of his third person.

Once the investigation is completed we will submit it to the district attorney who then submits it to the grand jury, who will decide if they will indict him."

Harmon described the dad as "very remorseful," adding that he didn't know the man was going to die.

Authorities were withholding the deceased man's name while they notified next of kin. Officials did not know immediately if he has a prior criminal history.

 
fuck, he'd be screwed if he lived in the great white north...but remorseful? i wouldn't be....one less perv to worry about.......
 
Son or daughter. Anyone mess with my kids and I would visit a wrath upon them they wish they died. Kids deserve our protection. No debate.
 
tboy said:
fuck, he'd be screwed if he lived in the great white north...but remorseful? i wouldn't be....one less perv to worry about.......

Not always!

My cousin pounded a guy that was thought to have messed with my cousin's daughter. It was the wrong guy and no-charges ensued because the guy wouldn't sign any complaints against my cousin. The real abuser was arrested and got his just desserts too.

My cousin and the guy he pounded became great friends, and the guy said he would have reacted the same way.
 
HOF said:
Not always!

My cousin pounded a guy that was thought to have messed with my cousin's daughter. It was the wrong guy and no-charges ensued because the guy wouldn't sign any complaints against my cousin. The real abuser was arrested and got his just desserts too.

My cousin and the guy he pounded became great friends, and the guy said he would have reacted the same way.

I'll take this story with a grain of salt because being common law, it is my understanding that the police or crown will determine if a charge is to be laid, and the victim is basically just a witness. They really have no say in whether a charge is laid or not.

Now, they have to know about the crime so unless someone informed the police, or saw what was happening and called, then no charges would be laid. This "guy" really doesn't have a say in whether there would be charges laid or not. It's not like he could say to the police if they showed up "it's ok, we're friends" the cops would look at the situation and either a) arrest the aggressor or b) arrest both for causing a public disturbance.

Shit dude, that variety store owner was arrested and charged for catching a thief, you don't think the cops would charge someone for KILLING someone else?
 
+1 on TBoy. A victim unwilling to sign a statement only matters insofar as providing evidence. If the police secure alternate proof, the Crown can proceed.

IMO, the interpretation of self-defense laws in Canada is plain stupid. You can defend yourself with force as long as you believe that you are in imminent danger, but once that threat passes, you must cease. That standard assumes rational thought in a situation that is, by definition, scarier than shit!
 
RAWD said:
+1 on TBoy. A victim unwilling to sign a statement only matters insofar as providing evidence. If the police secure alternate proof, the Crown can proceed.

IMO, the interpretation of self-defense laws in Canada is plain stupid. You can defend yourself with force as long as you believe that you are in imminent danger, but once that threat passes, you must cease. That standard assumes rational thought in a situation that is, by definition, scarier than shit!

I agree with you Rawd 100%.

Maybe Hof's cousin is located in the US. Harper is working on changing Canada's defence law is he not?
 
Take it with salt, it's a true story and no charges laid because the other guy refused to be a witness and the police and crown dropped that part of the incident.

You are both correct though the police warrant if a charge should be laid and the crown persues that charge if they believe it's worth while.

Not arguing with you guys, this is what happened.
 
You are also correct about alternate proof if given, which wasn't.

Not arguing with you guys, this is what happened.
 
Guido said:
I agree with you Rawd 100%.

Maybe Hof's cousin is located in the US. Harper is working on changing Canada's defence law is he not?

Nope, Fort Nelson, BC
 
ooops you forgot to add this:

Not arguing with you guys, this is what happened.
 
HOF said:
Take it with salt, it's a true story and no charges laid because the other guy refused to be a witness and the police and crown dropped that part of the incident.

You are both correct though the police warrant if a charge should be laid and the crown persues that charge if they believe it's worth while.

Not arguing with you guys, this is what happened.

I think it was your insinuation that it was up to "the guy" to file a complaint or not, which in Canada, it isn't.......
 
Back
Top Bottom