Made with Love

Wall Street adviser: Actual unemployment is 37.2%, 'misery index' worst in 40 years

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wanker
  • Start date Start date
W

Wanker

Guest
How true is this?.

https://washingtonexaminer.com/wall...isery-index-worst-in-40-years/article/2542604

Don't believe the happy talk coming out of the White House, Federal Reserve and Treasury Department when it comes to the realunemployment rate and the true “Misery Index.” Because, according to an influential Wall Street advisor, the figures are a fraud.

In a memo to clients provided to Secrets, David John Marotta calculates the actual unemployment rate of those not working at a sky-high 37.2 percent, not the 6.7 percent advertised by the Fed, and the Misery Index at over 14, not the 8 claimed by the government.

Marotta, who recently advised those worried about an imploding economy to get a gun, said that the government isn't being honest in how it calculates those out of the workforce or inflation, the two numbers used to get the Misery Index figure.

The unemployment rate only describes people who are currently working or looking for work,” he said. That leaves out a ton more.

“Unemployment in its truest definition, meaning the portion of people who do not have any job, is 37.2 percent. This number obviously includes some people who are not or never plan to seek employment.

But it does describe how many people are not able to, do not want to or cannot find a way to work. Policies that remove the barriers to employment, thus decreasing this number, are obviously beneficial,” he and colleague Megan Russell in their new investors note from their offices in Charlottesville, Va.

They added that “officially-reported unemployment numbers decrease when enough time passes to discourage the unemployed from looking for work. A decrease is not necessarily beneficial; an increase is clearly detrimental.”

Then there is the Misery Index, which is a calculation based in inflation and unemployment, both numbers the duo say are underscored by the government. He said that the Index doesn’t properly calculate how Uncle Sam is propping up the economy with bond purchases and other actions.

“These tricks, along with a host of other dubious accounting schemes, underreport inflation by about 3 percent,” they wrote, adding that the official inflation rate is just 1.24 percent.
“Today, the Misery Index would be 7.54 using official numbers,” they wrote.

But if calculations tabulating the full national unemployment including discouraged workers, which is 10.2 percent, and the historical method of calculating inflation, which is now 4.5 percent, ‘the current misery index is closer to 14.7, worse even than during the Ford administration.”
 
The best way to figure out the "EMPLOYMENT" rate (not the unemployment rate) is to compare the number of people working against the number of people eligible for work. Once unemployment benefits run out, it becomes difficult to access the unemployment figures.

Of course the government recently ended the extended benefits program, so, it will soon appear that the unemployment rate is dropping. This of course is not good news to the unemployed, but it is good news for those who seek re-election, etc...


The truth is, the unemployment rate is rising, not falling, it only appears to be falling due to those falling off the unemployment insurance programs.

Another way to do it is to look at the amount of taxes the US treasury collects. They have very good data on this and it is not manipulated. This metric takes into account both the total quality and quantity of jobs over the whole country.

And yes there was no recovery when you look at this. I don't think the unemployment rate is 37%, but it is much much higher than reported.
 
The best way to figure out the "EMPLOYMENT" rate (not the unemployment rate) is to compare the number of people working against the number of people eligible for work. Once unemployment benefits run out, it becomes difficult to access the unemployment figures.

Of course the government recently ended the extended benefits program, so, it will soon appear that the unemployment rate is dropping. This of course is not good news to the unemployed, but it is good news for those who seek re-election, etc...


The truth is, the unemployment rate is rising, not falling, it only appears to be falling due to those falling off the unemployment insurance programs.

Another way to do it is to look at the amount of taxes the US treasury collects. They have very good data on this and it is not manipulated. This metric takes into account both the total quality and quantity of jobs over the whole country.

And yes there was no recovery when you look at this. I don't think the unemployment rate is 37%, but it is much much higher than reported.


Impressed :-Cool/"
 
Unemployment rates have always been falsely low because they're based on the number of people looking for work. But when you count people who have given up, it goes much higher. When you also include those who are underemployed (taking part-time or casual work because it's all that's available) then the numbers are really worrying. But I'm not sure what this Wall Street advisor is up to since this isn't anything new. It's always been known. It's not some new White House deception; this is how unemployment has traditionally been calculated. And his alternate definition - “Unemployment in its truest definition, meaning the portion of people who do not have any job, is 37.2 percent. This number obviously includes some people who are not or never plan to seek employment" - is equally misleading. The 37.2 percent number is calculated for what age range? Does it take into account people who are in school? Many students aren't working, obviously. Lastly, some people aren't working because they don't need to work - e.g., stay-at-home parents, independently wealthy, early retirement etc.
 
What does this tell you about the economy?.

A record 20% of American households, one in five, were on food stamps in 2013, according to from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

The numbers also show there was a record number of individuals on food stamps in 2013 and that the cost of the program, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), was at an all-time high.


The USDA says that there were 23,052,388 households on food stamps in the average month of fiscal 2013, an increase of 722,675 from fiscal year 2012, when there were 22,329,713 households on food stamps in the average month.

https://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/record-20-households-food-stamps-2013
 
Back
Top Bottom