Made with Love

WATCH: Former flames fight over $16k engagement ring

Baz

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
1,853
A very interesting debate that has gone on through the ages, Who's Ring Is It?




In my opinion she should return the ring and it's obvious by the video she is a gold digger. They met on POF for Pete's sake!
 
She's too hot for him. I think she played him for as much as she could get, so I agree with you Baz, he should get it back!
 
In general...If he broke off the engagement, she should keep the ring. If she did, she should return it.

Unless the ring is a family heirloom, in which case it should always be returned.

In this particular case, um, yikes. Need more details about the financial goings-on to decide.

I don't think the fact that they met on POF automatically makes her a gold-digger, Baz.
 
SillyGirl said:
I don't think the fact that they met on POF automatically makes her a gold-digger, Baz.

If I'm not mistaken they were only together 3 weeks prior to receiving/giving the ring.

Some important comments

“She tried to milk me for $73,000 from my bank account to buy her condo.”
“You’re the escort,” says Zampieri.Followed by even more unsubstantiated allegations.
“You pick up hookers!” says Bennett.
“No, I don’t! You’re the hooker!” says Zampieri.
“I found out about you.”

I believe she knew what she was doing and never had intentions of marrying the man. He is guilty of being a fool with his money in my opinion.
 
Baz said:
If I'm not mistaken they were only together 3 weeks prior to receiving/giving the ring.

Some important comments

“She tried to milk me for $73,000 from my bank account to buy her condo.”
“You’re the escort,” says Zampieri.Followed by even more unsubstantiated allegations.
“You pick up hookers!” says Bennett.
“No, I don’t! You’re the hooker!” says Zampieri.
“I found out about you.”

I believe she knew what she was doing and never had intentions of marrying the man. He is guilty of being a fool with his money in my opinion.


It's entirely possible. It's also possible he's lying about things. Situations like this are why courts require proof of allegations.
 
SillyGirl said:
It's entirely possible. It's also possible he's lying about things. Situations like this are why courts require proof of allegations.

Hot blonde+Gremlin look-like = Gold Digger:biggrin:
 
Analme said:
Hot blonde+Gremlin look-like = Gold Digger:biggrin:


oh dear, my bad. I only read the article before commenting before. um, now that I've seen the video, I think you're probably right.

But...still not clear on who broke off the engagement. Is that a factor, legally?
 
POF is pretty popular for guys and girls who want to hook up with no strings attached. Here's how I see it:

  1. I think she is a gold digger.
  2. I think he was on POF to "hook up." Mind you being a Gremlin makes it owe so difficult.
  3. He's a moron to propose marriage after only three weeks of a so called relationship from POF.

As with things of this nature in life BUYER BEWARE.
 
Just glad I never have to worry about that. Marriage is out of the question for me.
 
Baz said:
A very interesting debate that has gone on through the ages, Who's Ring Is It?




In my opinion she should return the ring and it's obvious by the video she is a gold digger. They met on POF for Pete's sake!

Does it matter where they have met? Let's not judge.:wink2:

Really..what s the big deal. Just return the ring and stop wasting people or the court time. The man's asian female (no rating here...lol) legal counsel is not doing her job. She shouldnt be letting her client talking to the media before heading for the trial.

Now whom shall i choose...the asian woman or the "gold digger" (:no:).........the answer is the asian woman. :great:
 
DannyDeVito said:
Just glad I never have to worry about that. Marriage is out of the question for me.

Danny it doesn't matter. After 1 year you are common in law.

You are cooked either way.
 
Back
Top Bottom