Why Rate Escorts

[Albino]

I don't mind the rating system. I agree looks are very subjective but isn't it the same thing if YMMV applies. Bliss you must admit, your session and my session might bring in a totally different review and opinion of the SP.

 

[jumpingjackflash]

Not to change the topic or high jack the thread but Bliss have you and Brash ever considered a MFM session?

 

[ChrisD]

I thought the board was for people to post on men and women, am I wrong. I spend money too on escorts and not just an hour of their time but a 3 to 4 hours at a time every couple of weeks. Just as you made your opinion make, I can't. If this board is just for men, I guess the person who invited me on should have told me. I am sorry that you and the others can not understand different point of Views. What I was told this board was friendly and open to idea but as I see it is not better than the other board. So thank you very much for your friendly debate. I did not realize I am not wanted here. You all should have just said so. Yes Drama QUEEN and so on, you are just as annal as the other board.

Never mind the haters Bliss. This is just the reality of the industry. Men buy time with something they don't have at home to fulfill their fantasy. When you meet or see someone from afar that piques your interest, what is it? It's certainly not from speaking to that person, so it's not cerebral...yet. It's something about their personal self, they way they present themselves, they way they look...whatever it is, it's normally physical at first.

We're men, some of us just can't get beyond that physical attraction, ever. Every tastes is different, my 9 may be Bosco's 7..who cares, that's his own opinion, but I personally try not to use rating systems for physical beauty either. It's all about the experience for me.

 

[train]

I do not like when men rate women on a scale of 1 to 10. The women are not Commodity, not live stock or Stocks. How would you like escorts rating you from 1 to 10.

.

Actually they are commodities on some level. It's a business to escorts. Their choice, hopefully in most cases. They have determined the price of what they are selling and/or at what price they are willing to sell it.

Having said that, the whole experience is obviously a lot better if there is some kind of personal connection on whatever level. I happen to prefer to do my shopping with people I like for instance.

He/she who pays earns the right to rate their experience in an environment where you are asked just that question. Your comment about them rating Johns is not particularly relevant. They hopefully always have the choice of refusing you if your undesirability outweighs the bucks you are about to hand over. Besides I'm willing to bet that escorts actually do rate their clients on some kind of informal scale even if it is only favourites and "not him agains".

If you are upset about the form of the rating consider that numbers express opinions on the most simplistic level and while there is always a wide range of opinion it's short and sweet and tends to cut through a lot of BS.

 

[JackassJack]

Why rate escorts? Because we can. What is the big deal about it?

 

[Blackrock13]

Why rate escorts? Because we can. What is the big deal about it?

Someone must be upset because one man rose turned out to be another mans weed.

 

[Cycleguy007]

As I have said before... I have always found the 1-10 rating to be subjective... I rarely use it these days, but, having said this, there are varying degrees of HOTNESS for me at least! But like Rocky just said one man's rose can be another man's weed, based purely on the preferences of each man involved.

 

[Auggie]

ALL reviews are subjective, even Blissful's experiences are hers alone.

There's nothing wrong with subjective views, if there was then we should shut down all review boards.

 

[blissful]

Actually they are commodities on some level. It's a business to escorts. Their choice, hopefully in most cases. They have determined the price of what they are selling and/or at what price they are willing to sell it.

Having said that, the whole experience is obviously a lot better if there is some kind of personal connection on whatever level. I happen to prefer to do my shopping with people I like for instance.

He/she who pays earns the right to rate their experience in an environment where you are asked just that question. Your comment about them rating Johns is not particularly relevant. They hopefully always have the choice of refusing you if your undesirability outweighs the bucks you are about to hand over. Besides I'm willing to bet that escorts actually do rate their clients on some kind of informal scale even if it is only favourites and "not him agains".

If you are upset about the form of the rating consider that numbers express opinions on the most simplistic level and while there is always a wide range of opinion it's short and sweet and tends to cut through a lot of BS.

So what I get, is actually everybody is rated as a Commodity like cattle. Because I have never work for a company I did not realize they too use a rating scale for their workers.
So I was feeling uncomfortable with the rating scale but now feeling better because everybody who works for a Company does get rated by numbers.

So in point we are all Commodities like cattle or live stock, even heads of companies because they need to keep there numbers up.
Simple Thanks for the answer:happy:

 

[Blackrock13]

So what I get, is actually everybody is rated as a Commodity like cattle. Because I have never work for a company I did not realize they too use a rating scale for their workers.
So I was feeling uncomfortable with the rating scale but now feeling better because everybody who works for a Company does get rated by numbers.

So in point we are all Commodities like cattle or live stock, even heads of companies because they need to keep there numbers up.
Simple Thanks for the answer:happy:

We're always being rated by most people; job interviews, annual performances,, sales pitches, blind dates, first dates. A numerical rating is just one way of quantifying the call. As has been said before, it's fast, variable, and somewhat superficial but it does help. How much is up to the poster and the reader. No biggie.

I've sort of considered myself as more than meet on a hoof. Maybe that's just me, but hey. I've caught ladies checking me out and none have fallen over laughing or running away in fear, with one exception, so I guess I pass.

 

[tina]

we should shut down all review boards.[/QUOTE]
Hey ,thats a good idea!:happy:

 

[RAWD]

I'm not much a fan of ratings myself. Numbers don't mean anything without understanding the framework or reference.

I prefer something more objective (a checklist of features or services) or factual (a narrative of what happened).

 

[Beenthere123]

we should shut down all review boards.

Never, I have saved so much money and disappointments because of them.

 

[train]

Because I have never work for a company I did not realize they too use a rating scale for their workers.

Yes, most large companies have employee performance reviews which typically have some kind of numerical or alphabetical grading scale.

So in point we are all Commodities like cattle or live stock, even heads of companies because they need to keep there numbers up.
Simple Thanks for the answer

Restaurants and chefs are rated, wines and winemakers are rated, atheletes etc etc
I guess the difference being that some are relatively private and some are very public.

 

[tina]

Never, I have saved so much money and disappointments because of them.

You may have saved disappointment but probly spent way more money.:na: