Made with Love

Why Soy Isn't So Good After All

Maurice Boscorelli

Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2010
Messages
19,322
You are here: / / Why Soy Milk Is a Con Job
Why Soy Milk Is a Con Job

April 2, 2014 by


Joe, and particularly Jane Public are getting conned that soy is a health food.

Soy is a dangerous con job.

Years ago, a leader in the self-help industry, a man I highly respect, contacted me to find him a home trainer. Wanting to help him out as best as possible, I asked him a few questions. Very proudly, he announced he only drank soy lattes. I asked if his nipples were now the size of Frisbees, and he had more problem concentrating.
Needless to say, he inquired how I knew about the fact he was practically in need to wear a bra coupled with the attention span of a bobble head.
I despise all unfermented soy products like soy milk. Here are a few reasons why you should avoid soy milk.
Reason 1: It contains phytic acid
That is a compound that depletes nutrients and it wrecks havoc on mineral absorption. Most people already have poor digestion. Why make the situation worse?
Reason 2: Soy contains oxalic acid
Oxalic also depletes nutrients by binding to calcium, magnesium and iron, thus decreasing the absorption of these vital nutrients.
Reason 3: It is most likely coming from a GMO source
The Center for Food Safety estimates that 91 percent of the soybeans sold on the market are from a GMO source.
Reason 4: It is a feminizing agent
Because of its phytoestrogen content, men in particular, should avoid it unless droopy breast tissue, sexual dysfunction, reduced pilosity are on their goal list. This situation is even worse if you give it to infants.
Reason 5: It disrupts the thyroid
The goitrogenic content of soy products interfere with thyroid function as it disrupts iodine absorption. A drop in thyroid function eventually leads to fat gain.
Reason 6: Soy creates digestive issues
Soy milk is high in oligosaccharides, a carbohydrate that most people have a hard time breaking down, thus creating gastric discomfort, bloating, and enough gas to create your own personalized hole in the ozone layer.
Reason 7: It contains too much manganese
Robert Crayhon was the first one to point it out to me in 1999. Soy is processed in manganese vats, which leaks into the product. Manganese in excessive amounts is neurotoxic, hence the association made between soy products and attention deficit disorder.
Crayhon was always ahead of his time. Here is a piece on soy and manganese toxicity published in 2012, thirteen years after Crayhon pointed it out to me.
Does soy-based infant formula cause ADHD? Update and public policy considerations
Bottom line: get your raw milk from animals with breasts or utters.
Be wise,
 
I've never really liked soy taste wise. This article doesn't surprise me at all.
 
I asked if his nipples were now the size of Frisbees


:rofl!::rofl!:
 
If I may add to what's not good for you in this thread.

It takes a student to find out what the CFIA couldn't or didn't want.

A Canadian high school student named Bronwyn Delacruz never imagined that her school science project would make headlines all over the world. But that is precisely what has happened. Using a $600 Geiger counter purchased by her father, Delacruz measured seafood bought at local grocery stores for radioactive contamination.

What she discovered was absolutely stunning. Much of the seafood, particularly the products that were made in China, tested very high for radiation. So is this being caused by nuclear radiation from Fukushima? Is the seafood that we are eating going to give us cancer and other diseases? The American people deserve the truth, but as you will see below, the U.S. and Canadian governments are not even testing imported seafood for radiation.

To say that this is deeply troubling would be a massive understatement.

In fact, what prompted Bronwyn Delacruz to conduct her science project was the fact that the Canadian government stopped testing imported seafood for radiation …

Alberta high-school student Bronwyn Delacruz loves sushi, but became concerned last summer after learning how little food inspection actually takes place on some of its key ingredients.
The Grade 10 student from Grande Prairie said she was shocked to discover that, in the wake of the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)stopped testing imported foods for radiation in 2012.

And what should be a major red flag for authorities is the fact that the seafood with the highest radiation …

Armed with a $600 Geiger counter bought by her dad, Delacruz studied a variety of seafoods – particularly seaweeds – as part of an award-winning science project that she will take to a national fair next month.

“Some of the kelp that I found was higher than what the International Atomic Energy Agency sets as radioactive contamination, which is 1,450 counts over a 10-minute period,” she said. “Some of my samples came up as 1,700 or 1,800.
Delacruz said the samples that “lit up” the most were products from China that she bought in local grocery stores.

It is inexcusable that the Canadian government is not testing this seafood. It isn’t as if they don’t know that it is radioactive. Back in 2012, the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was being found in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was selling to Canada…

• 73 percent of the mackerel
• 91 percent of the halibut
• 92 percent of the sardines
• 93 percent of the tuna and eel
• 94 percent of the cod and anchovies
• 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish

So why was radiation testing for seafood shut down in Canada in 2012?
Someone out there needs to answer some very hard questions.
Meanwhile, PBS reporter Miles O’Brien has pointed out the extreme negligence of the U.S. government when it comes to testing seafood for Fukushima radiation.

The following comes from a recent EcoWatch article


Read more at https://investmentwatchblog.com/sch...in-grocery-store-seafood/#fzA22WxADh8fQugX.99
 
Back
Top Bottom