A problem with reviews...

[cristycurves]

While reading a thread about gfe or safe on another board, I read how one guy commented that if a girl didn't kiss he wouldn't see her. Fair and fine I thought, but then he went on to say, that if when booking she said she would then didn't, that would be cause for him to write a negative review......................

That angered me. Are there still some guys that are still daft to the fact of ymmv and that although we can make some comments to things we're willing to do with you, nothing can be guaranteed, since hygiene is a huge determining factor and that factor isn't known until you are intimate, or close. What if this guy had breath that smelled rank and teeth that looked unclean, of course no one is going to kiss him. So he then shouldn't have a right to post anything negative.
I found that whole thread upsetting. A bunch of guys preaching about what women should do and how "most" give bbbj, that it's a deal breaker if they don't, blah, blah, blah. When the subject of safer sex was mentioned one guy mentioned that he *only* had sex with the best looking sp's, lol. As if looks were some sort of protection against disease! It is one thing to seek out something you want, but to get on a board and make it seem that sp's *have to* provide a specific service to survive, is imo akin to pimpery. Having sex with multiple partners is risky enough, why risk things any further by expecting *anything* bare, and I'm speaking as someone who has given bbbj's in the past. Imo and from the advice of my medical practitioners, covered limits risk, and we all want to limit risk....right? This is what worries me so for the younger new girls in this business. You get a bunch of older guys like the ones mentioned, who will manipulate them into thinking they have to perform certain services, which isn't true. Because some or most do something *doesn't* mean you have to. Be the change, change is often good

 

[Madman]

I was a "john" that only seen ladies the provided kissing and bbbj but I would never threaten a lady with a bad review, this is so wrong. If I knew prior to the booking it was cbj, I would not book and look for a provider that more suits my wants also realizing I better be spotless hygiene wise if I want to maximize my mileage.

If I don't like the price I don't complain to the lady or ask for discounts, I just do not book and again look for a provider within my budget.

I would think what I just stated is common sense.

 

[Jasper]

A few ladies will hide behind the protection of YMMV and use it as an excuse not to provide advertised service. Nothing wrong with exposing them in a review.

But in general it's common sense, we won't get identical service to the guy before us because she isn't a robot. She will be more open if she isn't repelled by us and that is her right.

 

[God]

Be the change, change is often good

Not all the time.

 

[Flash Bazbo]

... one guy mentioned that he *only* had sex with the best looking sp's, lol. ...

I think an awful lot of guys think that way. Eye candy is a major factor for guys who pay for play, and well it should be. No man pays for a 'pity fuck', and few guys pay for the privilege of doing it with the lights off. There's a word for that; it's called "married". It's not just 'what you're doing', it's 'with whom it's being done'.

'Rosie Palmer' only costs the price of lubricant, kleenex, and visual stimulation. A 'desperate housewife' costs perhaps pizza delivery and some minor plumbing repairs; there are dozens of pornographic instructional films, showing how that 'barter system' works. Some 'amateur pros' might even accept Crappy Tire money, at 80 cents on the dollar.

A fair part of the deal for many guys is 'bragging rights'. Very few guys would want to pay for an experience that they would be ashamed to admit to their buds that they had done, for free. That is the nature of The Beast, and relates to the individual's minimum standards. As Donald Sutherland as Hawkeye asked of Robert Duvall as Frank in the 1970 Robert Altman film M*A*S*H, the first question a man asks himself is "Is she better than self abuse"?

 

[cristycurves]

@Madman-common sense isn't always common @Jasper-how do you know these ladies are hiding behind ymmv.... @God- I did say often, not all the time
@Primo-it doesn't matter how much you communicate, if I tell you I'll kiss as long as your breathe is fresh and you have good dental hygiene and you show up with skunk breathe and narly teeth, I'm not going to, nor am I going to take a loss. It is you whose baited and switched. @flash-the example you've used is understandable, the person I mentioned spoke of good looking sp's as if they're less prone to contracting an std. Std's aren't biased, they'll cling to good looking people, average looking people and unattractive people.

 

[Flash Bazbo]

@flash-the example you've used is understandable, the person I mentioned spoke of good looking sp's as if they're less prone to contracting an std. Std's aren't biased, they'll cling to good looking people, average looking people and unattractive people.

That is the hidden theme of "The Viral Joke".

 

[Flash Bazbo]

Re: #8: At least one of you knows 'Victoria's Secret'! I've been telling that one as a 'guerilla joke' to total strangers since May 3. A handwritten manuscript of the joke now appears on the wall, in the venue where it was first told. This post is 100% true. I'm just not saying where that happened, but it's east of Yonge Street, North of Queen Street, south of Bloor Street, and west of the Don River. If anyone finds it, send me a PM, with the location, and I will publicly acknowledge that your handle has won the Treasure Hunt. I may or may not include clues, in future posts. I don't, however, think this children's game will be sufficient incentive for Cristy to make a road trip to Toronto.

 

[cristycurves]

Well Flash I will be taking a road trip to To this summer, but not for seeing clients, but for my own indulgences and fun. Time to visit family, lol, that in itself is an adventure or a nightmare, depends on how you look at it.

 

[demien3k5]

A few ladies will hide behind the protection of YMMV and use it as an excuse not to provide advertised service. Nothing wrong with exposing them in a review.

But in general it's common sense, we won't get identical service to the guy before us because she isn't a robot. She will be more open if she isn't repelled by us and that is her right.

True.

A lot of providers want/need and are addicted to the money, but don't really want to 'do the work', and so play games around YMMV to 'get over' as often as possible.

Similarly, a lot of guys who hobby want and are addicted to sex with beautiful women (of all flavors), but also don't want to do the work associated with paying the freight, being clean, respectful, references, etc., and so behave badly while trying to negotiate fees, solicit BBFS, push drugs/alcohol onto the companion, and act in a generally intimidating fashion as a means to attempt to get what they want.

In the end, 'players' who behave badly on both sides of the line should be called out. Men have the public escort review forums as their vehicle, providers have their private ones, and social media is a growing channel in that regard as well. Neither is any better than the other in some ways, particularly where/when unfair or inaccurate accusations are concerned.

It's always been a delicate balance, probably always will be. In the long run, Caveat Emptor seems to be fairly applicable to both sides...

 

[LickingGravity]

I was a "john" that only seen ladies the provided kissing and bbbj but I would never threaten a lady with a bad review, this is so wrong. If I knew prior to the booking it was cbj, I would not book and look for a provider that more suits my wants also realizing I better be spotless hygiene wise if I want to maximize my mileage.

If I don't like the price I don't complain to the lady or ask for discounts, I just do not book and again look for a provider within my budget.

I would think what I just stated is common sense.

Agree with all of this 100%

 

[Flash Bazbo]

Well Flash I will be taking a road trip to To this summer, but not for seeing clients, but for my own indulgences and fun. Time to visit family, lol, that in itself is an adventure or a nightmare, depends on how you look at it.

If there's time in your itinerary for some live entertainment, Cristy, fully clothed, in a public place, with no uninvited guests nor paparazzi, I would offer to buy drinks. Contact me if that interests you, or I'll take a hint. I'm making you an offer you can refuse, as The Don would not say, and I don't mean POTUS.

 

[Flash Bazbo]

I think more than a few guys are angry at one or more women, and take that out on an Escort, justifying it that they're 'getting their money's worth', in surrogate revenge. Maybe his female boss gives him a reprimand, and he books a session with a provider who offers greek, for example.

 

[cristycurves]

^ Yup, there are men who'll seek out escorts to be abusive towards. That abuse can be physical, verbal, or both. These types usually have a hate on for women and will do what they can to harm each one they encounter. Escorts are usually an easy target for them.

 

[Flash Bazbo]

@ Cristy: "Time flies when you're having fun" - the guy who is buying a license to be an ass is looking at the difference between his hourly rate, and the Escort's, and saying to himself "She makes twenty times as much per hour as I do. That means I should make one hour of my company seem like twenty hours, in 'real time'. Time passes incredibly slowly, for example, if one is watching the clock tick down while something is heating up in a microwave oven.

 

[DannyDevito]

I just wonder why some of you write the same reviews on many sites. Don't tell me because you want to give them more exposure. Bull to that, has to be with your ego is what I say. There you go I said it, now come after me but did hire Guido, Demien, and Fugeeeee as my bodyguards

 

[bolt.upright]

I just wonder why some of you write the same reviews on many sites. Don't tell me because you want to give them more exposure. Bull to that, has to be with your ego is what I say. There you go I said it, now come after me but did hire Guido, Demien, and Fugeeeee as my bodyguards

I like it best here, but I know it gets a lot more views (and therefore it's more helpful to more guys) on the other board.

 

[Flash Bazbo]

I just wonder why some of you write the same reviews on many sites. Don't tell me because you want to give them more exposure. Bull to that, has to be with your ego is what I say. There you go I said it, now come after me but did hire Guido, Demien, and Fugeeeee as my bodyguards

It's an ego thing, Danny, just like the jocks in the locker room on the high school football team. Many reviews are just a Penthouse Forum letter, starring the author. Many are 'press releases', just giving the description, menu, and internal body temperature. It's not that different from the guy who sticks his head out the window of an apartment building and yells "Hey guys! I got some!". It makes an insignificant man feel self-important for a while. That's why YOU do it.

 

[Rolex]

I like it best here, but I know it gets a lot more views (and therefore it's more helpful to more guys) on the other board.

WRONG.

That is what most assume but it's quality not quantity. Just imagine if HUBGFE didn't exist?. Per example, you can have a great interaction board where you have fun with other members that does not qualify to or for an expected business number of clients that will or never buy your product.

It doesn't matter how many views Amazon has for potential buyers or what percentage of buyers write reviews.


I rest my case.

What percentage of buyers write reviews on Amazon? - Quora

 

[demien3k5]

If there's time in your itinerary for some live entertainment, Cristy, fully clothed, in a public place, with no uninvited guests nor paparazzi, I would offer to buy drinks. Contact me if that interests you, or I'll take a hint. I'm making you an offer you can refuse, as The Don would not say, and I don't mean POTUS.

Yes, this is every escort's dream. You can't afford to fly to her, or fly her to you. When she's in town on her own dime, rather than actually book her for her services and pay her published rate, you offer her cheap drinks when she charges +$250/hr for her 'companionship'. Almost feels like 'haggling' at a flea market or on a street corner with the local sw, poorly executed and in an ass backwards kind of way, but still 'haggling'. On Twitter, this would fall under the heading of 'Shit Punters Say'. Well done. You're a real player there, son! :rofl!: :LMAO: :YMAPPLAUSE: