Made with Love

Bring Back Owlboy thread

Analme

Reviewer
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Messages
2,025
This is a thread to stop the tyranny and bring back free speech!

BRING BACK BOBISTHEOWL or MM will be kept in a room under my basement and his sheep possibly on a barbecue by sunset tomorrow.



ps....if I get banned, then I'm also taking Papa with me and you all will starve because there will be NO MORE bacon, ever!
 
This is a thread to stop the tyranny and bring back free speech!

BRING BACK BOBISTHEOWL or MM will be kept in a room under my basement and his sheep possibly on a barbecue by sunset tomorrow.



ps....if I get banned, then I'm also taking Papa with me and you all will starve because there will be NO MORE bacon, ever!

I don't think that is too effective a threat. Some of us would pay good money for you to carry it out! :biggrin2:
 
Did he piss off the mods?.


All he did was search the internet to post his thoughts on what and how it should have been worded.

Nothing wrong with that and I also think the newer mods are overstepping their boundaries., boring or not.

I don't think Oceanus would have approved it.
 
I think the Owl wasn't a bad guy but man the gentleman can write. I get tired typing out 2 sentences. Mind you it probably has something to do with carpel tunnel.
 
I think the Owl wasn't a bad guy but man the gentleman can write. I get tired typing out 2 sentences. Mind you it probably has something to do with carpel tunnel.
Stop making excuses. No wonder Batman always leads.....Hmmmmmm:biggrin2:
 
Bob, where are you BOB??

I noticed you have been freed from one of the other CRATES PAPA hides on the roof.

COME OUT, HURRY before PEACE comes up and takes the tarps off!!!!
 
This is a thread to stop the tyranny and bring back free speech!

BRING BACK BOBISTHEOWL or MM will be kept in a room under my basement and his sheep possibly on a barbecue by sunset tomorrow.



ps....if I get banned, then I'm also taking Papa with me and you all will starve because there will be NO MORE bacon, ever!

Thank you, . I appreciate your interest in my well being. I'll spread my answer over several quote in this thread, for those readers you like to have their meat cut for them into bite size chunks.

I was able to post your handle in this thread by inserting an image that contained your handle as text. That image is here: . If I had typed it, the HUBGFE filter would have displayed it like this: Analme

Well, I guess the filter DOESN'T filter out your handle, but there's no telling whether that will change without notice. I was expecting XXXXme.

First, I was banned for one week sometime on January 13, and I didn't log back in until after midnight on the 21. I'll speculate why in a different reply.

Some things to know, about being on ban:

1) You can still read forum posts by coming to the site.

2) You cannot see the 'Likes' and 'Thanks' statistics for anyone, nor can you see if a post has been liked or thanked.

3) You cannot see images in posts that were uploaded to HUBGFE, but you can see images posted as hot links to other sites, or those linked to image hosting sites.

4) Although we do not have the option of liking or thanking a post made by a mod, it is possible to receive a likes or a thanks from a mod, even while on ban. You'd get the e-mail notice, but the notification would not be displayed at the bottom of the post, until you are logged in subsequent to the ban.

Most likely, the Search feature would not be available while on ban. I'm speculating on that, but from past experience. On the red board, I was banned from their version of The Lobby, but not from the other forums. If I used their search while logged in, any results from their Lobby were filtered out. If I wanted to post in their Sports forum, I just logged in as usual, and I couldn't see their lobby. If I logged out, I could see all of the forums, but I couldn't post, so I would expect that search would be disabled here as well, if someone is on ban.

I came to the site a few times while on ban, just to read and research. For the first day or so, my avatar was removed, and my custom title was changed to BANNED. A day or so later, both were restored. It's quite possible that I could have logged in anytime after the avatar and title were restored, but I didn't attempt that.
 
Please bring back the owl.

Thanks, Jasper. I'm going to speculate as to why I was banned. It's not something I said, it's something I did.

In "The Pork Poll" thread, page 4, post #77, https://www.hubgfe.com/community/sh...want-Pork-in-every-thread-in-The-Lobby7/page4, oldguyzer responded to me.

In post #78, Wild Bill temporarily closed the thread.

I copied oldguyzer's post, pasted it in the Pork room, and replied in #21379 on page 1069 https://www.hubgfe.com/community/sh...want-Pork-in-every-thread-in-The-Lobby7/page4 Nothing I posted on December 13 was removed or edited, and there's nothing nasty said in any of my posts that day.

I saw Wild Bill's post, but I misunderstood it. I wasn't looking to continue a discussion with oldguyzer; it wouldn't make sense to do that, at 12:53 AM; he'd be asleep, and I'd be doing something else by the time he got up. I don't debate in the pork room, I just make a statement, every so often.

While not provocative in motive, I did technically defy Wild Bill's order. I would guess that I was either banned by Wild Bill himself, OR another mod banned me on Wild Bill's behalf, and Wild Bill did not agree with him/her. Both assumptions are logically consistent with the facts.

I don't dispute it. A call was made, by someone authorized to make the call. I did my pinch, and I'm back. A one week ban is nothing to me. I get banned from the Yahoo! News, and I don't even post comments. When I was banned most recently from the red board, I didn't even inquire about it to 'the Zee Man' until more than eighteen weeks had passed, because my first ban was two weeks, and my second was six, so I figured they tripled each time.

When Aleem Dar's finger goes up on an lbw shout in a Test match, you don't see Jacques Kallis calling for DRS, to see if the Hawkeye simulation will get him off the hook. It doesn't matter if less than half the ball would have clipped the off stump. He walks back to the pavilion, as a man should, when judgement has been passed. That's the end of his innings, whether or not it should have been.

John McEnroe
was a great tennis player, but did you respect him as a man, when he presumed to do the umpire's job? I didn't. A great player shouldn't need to have the benefit of calls that could go either way. Had I been the umpire in one of those matches, John would not have questioned my judgement, a second time.

Maybe I could have come back earlier, I didn't check. When you get tossed from a baseball game for calling the umpire a cocksucker, you watch the rest of the game from the tunnel, or on TV in the clubhouse, while taking an ice bath. You don't put on a fake beard disguise, and try to sneak back in. Not if you're a man.

Proverbs 13:24 teaches us:

"He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes"
,

and if I was banned by Wild Bill, it would have been for exactly that reason.

I didn't dispute that, because I sometimes apply that same logic, when I chasteneth others within this forum, and it would be hypocritical to apply a code of conduct to others that I do not apply to myself.
 
Some of The Providers are wagering a great many quatloos on a different Thrall, and you haven't the foggiest idea what any of that meant.


Well that means two of us then,lol

Star Trek TOS - The Gamesters of Triskelion. I'm disappointed, Maurice Boscorelli, unless you meant that you were wagering with them.

Perhaps you though The Providers meant Escorts? That would be absurd; why would I bold-format those words?

Remember when Shaq was playing for the Lakers under Phil Jackson during the LA threepeat, and he always had some mysterious injury every January, and came back after the All-Star break? There was nothing wrong with him, any of those years. Phil just sat him down for a blow, so he'd have something left in the tank for when the real season started, at Conference finals.

January games meant a lot to the Eastern conference opponents, who hosted the Lakers once a year. Phil was managing his roster for the Finals, not trying to get two home playoff dates. Individual game results meant nothing. Seeding meant nothing. Anything less than a championship meant the season was a write off. In the 72-10 season in 95-96, Jud Buechler played the same ten minute stretch in every game. He had no stats to speak of, but he kept his opposite number in check while the talent freshened up. He took lots of fouls to slow the game down, so that Scottie and Mike could rest for 20 minutes, but only four clock minutes of game time would expire. THAT's good coaching.

So, I got a good rest, caught up on some of the work I've been neglecting, and I'm not on probation for Festivus. That's worth a week of MIA, to me.

Time for an avatar change.
 
Did he piss off the mods?.


All he did was search the internet to post his thoughts on what and how it should have been worded.

Nothing wrong with that and I also think the newer mods are overstepping their boundaries., boring or not.

I don't think Oceanus would have approved it.

Leo, I'm not sure I understand. If you are suggesting that I copy other people's prose from other sites, and post it here, that's entirely false. It is true that I frequently research my facts before posting. Only a fool woudn't. If I type statistical information, of course it's going to be researched; do you think I'd know Bob Buhl's career ERA off the top of my head?

Anything with an opinion is an opinion written by me. If someone else shares the same opinion, that doesn't make either of us a plagiarist. I do not, however, paraphase other authors. If I lift something from Wikipedia, it will be like a ten word phrase, that couldn't really be phrased much differently.

When I post in the politically incorrect jokes thread, I'm the author of about half of them, and I credit the source, if I know who wrote the joke, (as I did for an Emo Phillips joke). The one you didn't like 'Why did Jack divorce the fat chick? Because he wanted the magic beans back, instead of a cow', or similar, that one's mine. It's a pun on the Jack and the Beanstock fairytale, but the 'magic beans' refers to his testicles; he wanted those back. The wife is large in the joke, only because there would be no association between a thin woman an a cow. It's not a BBW joke. It's a comment about pussywhipped married men, whose wives possess the man's balls, for safe keeping.

My jokes are usually formulated like math equations. When you have the punch line, the lead up makes sense. I consider it respectful to the reader to assume that they would understand them. My solid friends get most of them. One guy gets all of them, we just have all the same pop culture memories, and he's tuned in to the proper wavelength.

I said this part before in another thread. There was a woman with whom I went to college, (my second stint, 1983-84), that would figure out my jokes in 'real time', and say part of the punch line along with me. She'd never heard the joke before. It had never been told before. She was just the McGuyver of jokes; she saw them as a math equation to solve, with a time limit.

She was a real hottie, too, looked like a 17 year old Raquel Welch, and she thinks logically; programs computers now. On the 1-10 Montreal scale, in college, she was about a 27.5, and probably a solid 14 today, even approaching 50. I am expecting our paths to cross again, but not for a while, but I did find her on Linked-In. My home girls don't waste their time on social media sites.

Leo, I met Oceanus only in passing, he was on the way out, when I was on the way in. He knew me, however, and referred to me as 'bito' in a private message, so I must have known him by a different handle on the red board.
 
Some of The Providers are wagering a great many quatloos on a different Thrall, and you haven't the foggiest idea what any of that meant.

You would be incorrect there, Bobby.

It was a pleasant, quiet week here without you. But as I'm sure you are going to be true to form, it'll soon be quiet again.
 
Back
Top Bottom