Bring Back Owlboy thread

[JessieJames]

You would be incorrect there, Bobby.

It was a pleasant, quiet week here without you. But as I'm sure you are going to be true to form, it'll soon be quiet again.

Why, what form is that? The owl doesn't seem to be a threat unless of course we still had paper and then the poor trees maybe threatened but in the digital world it is safe to say "let the man write his thoughts"

 

[bobistheowl]

Why, what form is that? The owl doesn't seem to be a threat unless of course we still had paper and then the poor trees maybe threatened but in the digital world it is safe to say "let the man write his thoughts"

I'm a threat to the old guys who think they're funny, JessieJames. The muppet thinks he should call the shots, because he's old, as if HUBGFE was the Catholic Church.

He's about as funny as a Latin mass, except for when the priest sings in all the different keys, and different speeds. That's funnier than me.

If the old guy wanted a second career, he should do stand up comedy at old age homes. The insurance cost would be low, because the underwriter would be confident that none of the shut ins would die laughing.

 

[Transient]

:LMAO:










:SayWhat?:









:unknw:

 

[oldguyzer]

I'm a threat to the old guys who think they're funny, JessieJames. The muppet thinks he should call the shots, because he's old, as if HUBGFE was the Catholic Church.

He's about as funny as a Latin mass, except for when the priest sings in all the different keys, and different speeds. That's funnier than me.

If the old guy wanted a second career, he should do stand up comedy at old age homes. The insurance cost would be low, because the underwriter would be confident that none of the shut ins would die laughing.

You know that feeling you get that people are laughing AT you and not WITH you? Go with that feeling.

 

[peace]

You know that feeling you get that people are laughing AT you and not WITH you? Go with that feeling.

sorry off topic here, please tell me more about our experience in Vietnam? I was there a year ago and boy there were many lovely ladies....unfortunately I didn't frolick with any of them....

 

[Guido]

sorry off topic here, please tell me more about our experience in Vietnam? I was there a year ago and boy there were many lovely ladies....unfortunately I didn't frolick with any of them....

We need to talk, I'm worried about you. If you didn't frolick with the women, who did you frolick with??

Bob, be-careful I hear Papa enjoys going Owl hunting, is a crack shot and cooks up a mean bird!

BTW did I mention I'm starving??

 

[oldguyzer]

sorry off topic here, please tell me more about our experience in Vietnam? I was there a year ago and boy there were many lovely ladies....unfortunately I didn't frolick with any of them....

I have had the good fortune to have dated a few stunning Vietnamese ladies over the last 15 years, several of them for multiple years. In my humble opinion, they are the best ladies in the world.

 

[bobistheowl]

You know that feeling you get that people are laughing AT you and not WITH you? Go with that feeling.

Life was a lot easier for you around here, wasn't it, when people just obeyed you, because you had the oldest avatar? I'm sure you did that yourself, when your avatar had hair on it, and your scrotum and ears did not.

 

[oldguyzer]

Life was a lot easier for you around here, wasn't it, when people just obeyed you, because you had the oldest avatar? I'm sure you did that yourself, when your avatar had hair on it, and your scrotum and ears did not.

Gosh, Bob, that's really, really clever of you! Who'd a thunk of using "old" as an insult as wittily as you do?

Has it not occured to you, oh one of small mental capacity, that simply because I included the word "old" in my handle and use a favorite sarcastic bald muppet as my avatar, that maybe I'm not that old? Nah...that would require you to actually think outside the box.

I know you want to try to prove you're intelligent, but you can't. Sorry, you just don't measure up to many people here. Keep trying...maybe one day you'll find a brain cell you can use. In the meantime, you're just noise in the system.

 

[bobistheowl]

I have had the good fortune to have dated a few stunning Vietnamese ladies over the last 15 years, several of them for multiple years. In my humble opinion, they are the best ladies in the world.

 

[bobistheowl]

"Gosh, Bob, that's really, really clever of you! Who'd a thunk of using "old" as an insult as wittily as you do?

Has it not occured to you, oh one of small mental capacity, that simply because I included the word "old" in my handle and use a favorite sarcastic bald muppet as my avatar, that maybe I'm not that old? Nah...that would require you to actually think outside the box.

I know you want to try to prove you're intelligent, but you can't. Sorry, you just don't measure up to many people here. Keep trying...maybe one day you'll find a brain cell you can use. In the meantime, you're just noise in the system." - oldguyzer

Gosh, Bob, that's really, really clever of you! Who'd a thunk of using "old" as an insult as wittily as you do?

Has it not occured to you, oh one of small mental capacity, that simply because I included the word "old" in my handle and use a favorite sarcastic bald muppet as my avatar, that maybe I'm not that old? Nah...that would require you to actually think outside the box.

I know you want to try to prove you're intelligent, but you can't. Sorry, you just don't measure up to many people here. Keep trying...maybe one day you'll find a brain cell you can use. In the meantime, you're just noise in the system.

I will quote excerpts from this post, during the Airing of the Grievances portion of the Festivus celebration on Tuesday evening, the 23rd.

I posted your remark twice, so that my post can't be altered by you changing yours.

It's all right there, in my signature line.

By the way, you misspelled occurred.

 

[oldguyzer]

I will quote excerpts from this post, during the Airing of the Grievances portion of the Festivus celebration on Tuesday evening, the 23rd.

I posted your remark twice, so that my post can't be altered by you changing yours.

It's all right there, in my signature line.

By the way, you misspelled occurred.

If I did change my post, it would not change your quoting of that post. You should know that by now, considering the amount you post and quote.

And it's cute that you try so hard to build up a list of grievances, as if anyone gave a damn.

And yep, I misspelled occurred because I don't use a spell checker when posting here because, quite frankly, it doesn't matter. See, Bobby, this isn't real life. This isn't even a fantasy. This is where I go to have fun chatting with some clever people when I'm not doing my real job of helping people. I enjoy the banter here, or at least I did. And then you came along and ruined that fun. So, it's back to ignoring you. Too bad, it actually is mildly amusing watching you try so hard. But in the end, you are simply full of it.

 

[peace]

ok...back to Vietnam.....trust me Guido, I did try. I did meet one but she was from Taiwan. Yet I agree with Oldguyzer.....those Vietnamese women...:great: :great: Dang...

 

[oldguyzer]

ok...back to Vietnam.....trust me Guido, I did try. I did meet one but she was from Taiwan. Yet I agree with Oldguyzer.....those Vietnamese women...:great: :great: Dang...

I don't know what it is about the genetic pool in that country, but I see more stunning ladies from Nam than most Asian countries, and I've spent extended time in all of them. My first trip to Saigon I managed to meet a lovely girl in a restaurant, who I then spent three wonderful years with. She was a stunning lady who had modelled professionally in Japan. We eventually broke up because she moved to Europe to continue her modelling career, and I couldn't go with her due to my commitments in Nam. However, a few months later, another wonderful lady came along. It's the one country in the world I truly love visiting every time for the distractions. The ladies don't care how old you are, how rich you are, or what you do in life, as long as you treat them with respect.

 

[peace]

I swear...I did treat them with respect....I often ended up answering their survey questions as they seem curious about Caucasian people but dang I had no success........I hope to return there....

 

[User-E]

I swear...I did treat them with respect....I often ended up answering their survey questions as they seem curious about Caucasian people but dang I had no success........I hope to return there....

You must have ended up in the Friend Zone.

 

[peace]

You must have ended up in the Friend Zone.

nothing wrong with it but dang, I wanted some..................u know......lol....:great:

 

[bobistheowl]

If I did change my post, it would not change your quoting of that post...

If I use the reply with quote button, and do not alter anything between the left square bracket preceding the Q at the beginning of your quoted post HTML, and the right square bracket following the E, my text would be linked to yours, so if you edited your post after the fact, it would alter the quoted section of my post.

If the semi colon and the thread tag number, (the excerpt I'm quoting now is numbered 600148), were removed, that link would be broken. The link would also be broken, if the 'quote' and 'unquote' HTML tags were manually inserted, with selected text from a previous post pasted between them.

You can tell the difference by whether or not a mini avatar is displayed after the handle of the person who has been quoted. The blue left double quotes are created by the HTML tags, as is the balloon frame.

If you click on the mini avatar, you'll go to the page where the quote originated, so that serves no purpose if the post being quoted is on the same page, provided that the original post and the quoted post remain on the same page, as posts that may potentially be deleted in the future can change the page numbers of posts in the present sequence.

If the semi colon and tag number are not present, the quote balloon looks different, because it's all just text in a quote balloon.

Compare the two displays:

You should know that by now, considering the amount you post and quote.

You should know that by now, considering the amount you post and quote.

I'm a moderator on another board, so I would know something like that.

The purpose of this is to prevent someone from defaming another forum member, by typing

, typing anything they want to, and closing the quote tag, to intentionally mislead the reader into thinking that the person quoted actually posted the text marked as having been quoted. That would be potentially libelous, in the eyes or moderators, where malicious intent is perceived. It's generally permitted, when exercised with some discretion, in a playful way, as with a Fixed your post post of some sort.

Fixing a post made by IfYouSeekAmy, however, as an hypothetical example, might be deemed to have malicious intent, because she has posted publicly that she finds that behavior to be personally offensive to her.

If, hypothetically, she quoted her own post, and that of a post in which such a violation occurred, and contacted a moderator privately, the possibility would exist that disciplinary measures could be exercised. The principle of Ignorantia juris non excusat, ("ignorance of the law does not excuse", in Latin), could be deemed applicable.

The practice of 'Fixing posts' is generally permitted, (but frowned upon), unless a documented complaint is made, by an individual who has previously stated objection to such actions. That's how we would do it, anyway, on the one I moderate, (not just me moderating; I'm one of 45, and some pop in only every couple of years).

We don't get that sort of thing much. 'Fixed your post' is more of a low brow forum amusement.


I believe I have just dis-proven the old adage You can't teach an old dog new tricks.

 

[papasmerf]

If I use the reply with quote button, and do not alter anything between the left square bracket preceding the Q at the beginning of your quoted post HTML, and the right square bracket following the E, my text would be linked to yours, so if you edited your post after the fact, it would alter the quoted section of my post.

If the semi colon and the thread tag number, (the excerpt I'm quoting now is numbered 600148), were removed, that link would be broken. The link would also be broken, if the 'quote' and 'unquote' HTML tags were manually inserted, with selected text from a previous post pasted between them.

You can tell the difference by whether or not a mini avatar is displayed after the handle of the person who has been quoted. The blue left double quotes are created by the HTML tags, as is the balloon frame.

If you click on the mini avatar, you'll go to the page where the quote originated, so that serves no purpose if the post being quoted is on the same page, provided that the original post and the quoted post remain on the same page, as posts that may potentially be deleted in the future can change the page numbers of posts in the present sequence.

If the semi colon and tag number are not present, the quote balloon looks different, because it's all just text in a quote balloon.

Compare the two displays:





I'm a moderator on another board, so I would know something like that.

The purpose of this is to prevent someone from defaming another forum member, by typing

, typing anything they want to, and closing the quote tag, to intentionally mislead the reader into thinking that the person quoted actually posted the text marked as having been quoted. That would be potentially libelous, in the eyes or moderators, where malicious intent is perceived. It's generally permitted, when exercised with some discretion, in a playful way, as with a Fixed your post post of some sort.

Fixing a post made by IfYouSeekAmy, however, as an hypothetical example, might be deemed to have malicious intent, because she has posted publicly that she finds that behavior to be personally offensive to her.

If, hypothetically, she quoted her own post, and that of a post in which such a violation occurred, and contacted a moderator privately, the possibility would exist that disciplinary measures could be exercised. The principle of Ignorantia juris non excusat, ("ignorance of the law does not excuse", in Latin), could be deemed applicable.

The practice of 'Fixing posts' is generally permitted, (but frowned upon), unless a documented complaint is made, by an individual who has previously stated objection to such actions. That's how we would do it, anyway, on the one I moderate, (not just me moderating; I'm one of 45, and some pop in only every couple of years).

We don't get that sort of thing much. 'Fixed your post' is more of a low brow forum amusement.


I believe I have just dis-proven the old adage You can't teach an old dog new tricks.

Go ahead and delete the previous post and prove you are right

 

[Extra]

If I use the reply with quote button, and do not alter anything between the left square bracket preceding the Q at the beginning of your quoted post HTML, and the right square bracket following the E, my text would be linked to yours, so if you edited your post after the fact, it would alter the quoted section of my post.

If the semi colon and the thread tag number, (the excerpt I'm quoting now is numbered 600148), were removed, that link would be broken. The link would also be broken, if the 'quote' and 'unquote' HTML tags were manually inserted, with selected text from a previous post pasted between them.

You can tell the difference by whether or not a mini avatar is displayed after the handle of the person who has been quoted. The blue left double quotes are created by the HTML tags, as is the balloon frame.

If you click on the mini avatar, you'll go to the page where the quote originated, so that serves no purpose if the post being quoted is on the same page, provided that the original post and the quoted post remain on the same page, as posts that may potentially be deleted in the future can change the page numbers of posts in the present sequence.

If the semi colon and tag number are not present, the quote balloon looks different, because it's all just text in a quote balloon.

Compare the two displays:





I'm a moderator on another board, so I would know something like that.

The purpose of this is to prevent someone from defaming another forum member, by typing

, typing anything they want to, and closing the quote tag, to intentionally mislead the reader into thinking that the person quoted actually posted the text marked as having been quoted. That would be potentially libelous, in the eyes or moderators, where malicious intent is perceived. It's generally permitted, when exercised with some discretion, in a playful way, as with a Fixed your post post of some sort.

Fixing a post made by IfYouSeekAmy, however, as an hypothetical example, might be deemed to have malicious intent, because she has posted publicly that she finds that behavior to be personally offensive to her.

If, hypothetically, she quoted her own post, and that of a post in which such a violation occurred, and contacted a moderator privately, the possibility would exist that disciplinary measures could be exercised. The principle of Ignorantia juris non excusat, ("ignorance of the law does not excuse", in Latin), could be deemed applicable.

The practice of 'Fixing posts' is generally permitted, (but frowned upon), unless a documented complaint is made, by an individual who has previously stated objection to such actions. That's how we would do it, anyway, on the one I moderate, (not just me moderating; I'm one of 45, and some pop in only every couple of years).

We don't get that sort of thing much. 'Fixed your post' is more of a low brow forum amusement.


I believe I have just dis-proven the old adage You can't teach an old dog new tricks.

So you are the one that hacked The interview movie.