Funny you mention this example. I seen a tweet from Jillian of Cupids who I will never use her agency again. She tweeted if an SP gets her period we should just accept it and deal with it. Yes, I agree it's not the ladies fault 100% but wouldn't some form of compensation or another session another day be appropriate, after all we did pay for a service? I find this as a double standard is becoming apparent in the industry among providers.
I also believe respect should be given from both parties and reasonable boundaries should be respected. I say "reasonable" as we are discussing the industry. A service is being paid for and that should be provided and as you mentioned, if it cannot then money returned and ask the client to leave.
I know I really am the minority with my stance on period work.
I have no problem with a woman working on her period. I even have no issues with her working and not compensating for a lower rate so long as it is known before the client shows up. There is always a confirmation before pre-booked appointments so that is the time to say "hey, I woke up and got my period, how would you like to proceed?" Appointments are based on time, not activity, so rates are rates.
When you show up and this has happened, where the period starts literally 10 mins prior to the client arriving. Then again, she should bring up the fact that she got her period, and then offer a compensation if the client chooses to the leave. Yes, not her fault, but he showed up and if he chooses to leave, that is his choice. You can offer a lower rate for lower services, but again - I don't like the "activity" based style rates, so I would not, but I get the reasons why some would.
For the period that happened to come during the actual session - ya, kinda got to get over that. It is not her fault at all. Nothing she can do about it. And since it is found out usually after the deed is done, again - I am not big on offering compensation for something that like this and let's be real, the deed is done so it was paid for.
My biggest issue is the escorts who use the sponge trick and just don't say anything at all. It is pure deceit and THAT is wrong. Because this is a service, when men make an appointment, they do so with the natural assumption that it will be period free sex. It is up to the woman to not only remain professional but to ensure she has proper INFORMED consent. Can't do that when you are hiding your period. These women have no idea why a man would have an issue regarding period blood, be it religious, culture or whatever, and no woman has the right to force a man to have period sex if he doesn't want to.
Now others have said to me that I have no right to tell ladies they can't earn a living because of a natural biological condition. However, to make it clear - I am not telling them they can't work or earn a living. I am just telling them they can't force a man to fuck them when on their period by hiding it. There are plenty of men who have no issues with period sex.
I will say that the one thing that pisses me off personally about it, is the idea that a woman's right to earn money seems to trump a man's right to choose, in their opinions. Which if you think about it, is really stupid. I have been getting my period for 30 years now. That is 12 periods a year for 30 years. I know when my period is coming, how long it will last, etc. There are apps that track this shit now. You can't tell me that you can't plan around it.
I have had to manage my period and mainstream work for years as well. I have to take off one day usually do to pain. So periods affect all work, and yet we manage. I don't think this industry should be any different.
We make good money for what we do. We should be able to manage our money enough to cover a couple of days off if need be but if not, then be honest. There will be clients who will see you, so why lie? Why hide it? I don't get it.
Again, just my opinion, which I know goes against the grain, but informed consent is not something I can comprise on simply because it is coming from a woman doing the wrong, not the guy. That is just wrong.