yes[/COLOR]
You could very well be right, but the point I was trying to make was that it may not be as many as you think. Its an expression that I'm sure you have heard before. Since only you know what you were really thinking that's going to tough prove for those that insist on a literal intepretation of eveything. If I were a lawyer I would ask Your Honour for permission to "Rephrase" and say " There are many members , your honour, who are single and some who are married but do not even see sp's or MPA's. Quite possible all who have ventured opinions in this thread may fall into that category" :biggrin:
I'm a firm believer in what is good for the goose being good for the gander but I think that was part of this whole discussion. Here you have a woman who went through a situation of being cheated on receiving sympathy and now considering doing it herself.
I would also like you to consider whether there is a difference between your average non-professional affair and visiting a sp or an mpa. In my opinion there both is and isn't. I mean, yes, you are still guilty as charged but you are usually innocent of seeking anything beyond the physical act. Something akin to the difference between involuntary manslaughter and first degree murder if you will.
On top of all that there is the very human practice of advice despensing using to philosophy " Do as I say and not as I do " because we all know that we are imperfect creatures. So seeing a sp and while simultaneously recommending that someone else not cheat in a non-professional scenerio when there are alternatives is quite a normal response. Not necessarily a sexist thing.