Made with Love

Jagger’s daughter nude in Playboy

Bubba

Reviewer
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
4,176
CG, can you find us her naked pictures???? :tongue:



Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall’s daughter Elizabeth has landed the cover shot on the new Playboy magazine. The sexy model, who is the spitting image of her mom, appears naked in the men's magazine - as Lizzy.

Her six-page, eight photo spread inside features 27-year-old Jagger baring all and seductively smoking a cigarette. She admits she had no problems getting naked for the Playboy shoot, telling the publication, "I feel comfortable expressing myself through my body... I'm kind of a topless person. I'm quite European."
And Lizzy insists her parents were OK about her stripping off: "They understand that when you don't know when you're going to have kids, it's nice to have wonderful pictures of your 20-something self."

But not everyone appreciates her natural nakedness - she reveals she has avoided a couple of citations in America for taking her clothes off. She explains, "They could tell I was foreign, (so) they understood.
 
They haven't hit that Interweb thingy yet... At least not that I can find in a quick check anyway.

Holy crap does she look like her mom.

Elizabeth Jagger:
KBUPH.jpg


Jerry Hall at roughly the same age:
dOSta.jpg



(Thanks god! :shock:)
 
They haven't hit that Interweb thingy yet... At least not that I can find in a quick check anyway.

Holy crap does she look like her mom.

Elizabeth Jagger:
KBUPH.jpg


Jerry Hall at roughly the same age:
dOSta.jpg



(Thanks god! :shock:)

Mama is better looking.
 
Mick looks good for his age, very fit too.

Don't want to see him naked but I bet a few women on here would. :???:
 
They haven't hit that Interweb thingy yet... At least not that I can find in a quick check anyway.

Holy crap does she look like her mom.


(Thanks god! :shock:)

No god involvement here, it was all DNA.......

You know, with Jagger, I never could understand why women went gaga over him. I saw him when he first hit North America and he was an ugly fuck back then too. Now this may be blasphemous to some of you, but I never understood why the stones were SO fricken big. I mean, IMO jagger isn't much of a vocalist in my book. Hell, some of the rejects from american idol can sing better than he can.

CG has two assignments today: find the nude pix of Elisabeth and the glamour model shots of the SSG....
 
tboy said:
You know, with Jagger, I never could understand why women went gaga over him. I saw him when he first hit North America and he was an ugly fuck back then too. Now this may be blasphemous to some of you, but I never understood why the stones were SO fricken big. I mean, IMO jagger isn't much of a vocalist in my book. Hell, some of the rejects from american idol can sing better than he can.

+1 and completely with you on this. There's not a single song of there's I like.
 
The Stones were awesome I'll put Forty Licks up against any "best of" album. You guys must be a couple of those semi-gay Beatle-loving types :).
 
They put out a lot of crap which is normal for anyone together so long but their best stuff from the late sixties is fantastic. They credited and promoted the people who inspired them which was rare back then.
 
Elizabeth Jagger certainly bares a remarkable resemblance to her mother Jerry Hall.
 
I wouldnt want some pansy on American Idol fronting the Stones.:grrrrrr:

remember? I said the REJECTS from american idol because hell, you wouldn't want someone who could actually SING lol.....

3 songs that are semi-bearable:
Brown Sugar
Paint it Black
and Satisfaction (but the devo version not the stones version lol)
 
The Stones were awesome I'll put Forty Licks up against any "best of" album. You guys must be a couple of those semi-gay Beatle-loving types :).

Sorry to disappoint... not big on the Beatles either or semi-gay for that matter. (My wife is though! :))

Greatest Rock Band of all time?

9s84l.jpg


bar none...
 
You know, U2 kind of reminds me of the Tragically Hip. Really good at the beginning, then went all commercial and lost their edge.....(even though U2 still has their "edge" lol)......
 
U2 the best band of all time? Give your head a shake man.

Not even the best to come out of the U.K.

Queen kicks their ass every time.
 
uhmmm we wil we will rock you!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ........with or without you...both great bands......:)
 
You are right Queen WAS AWESOME. But Queen without Mercury is nothing. Had Freddie not passed on, they may still be going strong, who knows.

Queen: 1971 to 1991: "broke through" so to speak in 1974 so 17 years at the top of their game (no pun intended, LOL)

U2: 1976 to present: "broke through" so to speak in 1980 so 31 years at the top of their game. Their current tour is listed as the highest grossing concert tour of all time

We could list sales, grammies, add'l awards, concert sales etc, but all that is immaterial for the reasons given by FieldingMelish.

I love all of Queen's stuff, but as far as longevity goes, U2 is still #1 in my book.

Still looking for Lizzy's pics BTW... Still N/A. :frown:
 
Back
Top Bottom