Made with Love

Mladen Miljas has arrived

Flash Bazbo

BANNED
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
736
Mladen Miljas has to be seen to be believed. He's six foot, six inches tall, and 260 pounds of granite. He's also a part time university student, but his real passion is boxing. The problem is, he can't find anyone with the balls to fight him. Seriously, you would not want to not be his friend; think 'Real life Ivan Drago' from Rocky IV. He's not a man, he's a Golem. Let the world beware this 21 year old Superman, who trains ten minutes from where I'm living. His nickname should be "Dr. Manhattan".

There aren't a lot of photographs of this guy online. Here's one from a few years ago:

mladen_miljas.jpg.size.xxlarge.letterbox.jpg

when he weighed only 225. Since then, he's added 35 pounds of muscle.

Ladies, weigh in on this, please (and you too, peace):

Is a man that size, that buff, that young and that deadly a turn on, for you or a turn off?

Are you drawn like a moth to his naturally superior genes, or scared shitless, by his potential for violence?

Would you WANT to go on a date with him, after he's just beaten another man senseless, after having abstained from sex for weeks prior to that?

I'm not pimping him out, this is just the kind of question inquiring minds should want to know; are you turned on by the uber-alpha male, just the safe milquetoast who pays the bills, or a little of both?
 
WTF :SayWhat?:

I thought you took a picture of the "Daddy"......


ps. No thanks.
 
I'm not sure who the "Daddy" is.....
but I'll answer your questions, my twenty something me would have wanted to date him, then I was into big physically intimidating guys. Bikers, mob guys, you know the types.
Now I like men who are kind, considerate, confident and who have goals and achieve them. Their physical stature and looks are irrelevant. So since I don't know this guy, I can't say if he'd turn me on or not:) and he's too young for me anyways:)
 
cristycurves said:
I'm not sure who the "Daddy" is.....


Oh boy, he is going to be disappointed. You hurt his feelings. Soon he will let you know.....:biggrin2:
 
cristycurves said:
I'm not sure who the "Daddy" is.....
but I'll answer your questions, my twenty something me would have wanted to date him, then I was into big physically intimidating guys. Bikers, mob guys, you know the types.
Now I like men who are kind, considerate, confident and who have goals and achieve them. Their physical stature and looks are irrelevant. So since I don't know this guy, I can't say if he'd turn me on or not:) and he's too young for me anyways:)

Cristy, your response is exactly what I would expect, from most women who answer the question honestly. This is an important point to consider:

Women are attracted to the 'bad boy' types during their youth, based on evolutionary biology: ie: your eyes are attracted to the guy with the six-pack abs, and V shaped torso, in the same way that the young man is attracted naturally to the woman with a classic hourglass figure. These are seen as being beneficial for procreative sexual partners' ie: Each would like their offspring to have similar physical traits. The type of person who is best suited for genetic attraction, however, is often not the best choice for nurturing children, who may or may not carry his genes, (there is never any doubt as to a child's maternity).

Each of us is descended from individuals who did not go 'extinct'. Any man or woman who is infertile 'goes extinct'. Any man or woman who choses not to reproduce 'goes extinct'. Any monogamous man/ woman with an infertile spouse 'goes extinct'. Certain types of people are common, because that type of person is biologically successful. They may have horrible traits in addition to their 'sex appeal', but from an evolutionary point of view, they are successes. Apparently, something like 20% or more of the population of much of Eurasia carries the genes of Genghis Khan's grandfather, because the Mongols conquered much of that area, killing the men and male children, and raping the women, who later bore children, fathered by the invaders. While that may be seen as morally reprehensible, from a biological point of view, it was a winning strategy. The Khans were fruitful, and they multiplied.

We see this as well in the animal kingdom, for example, when a lion supplants the previous male head of a pride, all of the lion cubs from the previous alpha are killed, because the females will not go into heat, while nursing. The lion, or the sexual predator, don't care about nurturing young, they just care about passing on their genes. Morality is not a component of biological imperative.

In recent years, where the focus has been more on recreational sex, rather than procreative, there are interesting 'winners and losers'. The biggest loser, in this scenario, is the common 'fat chick'. The reason why is that fat equals fertility. Very thin women have a lot of difficulty becoming pregnant. That makes them excellent choices when one wishes to avoid an 'accidental pregnancy'. 'Fat chicks' are abundant, because they have all of the natural advantages for conception and bringing a baby to term: Their wide hips make them less likely to die during childbirth. Their extra pounds mean that they can 'feed' a child, in utero, even if food is scarce. The urge to 'eat for two' exists, whether or not they are pregnant. If they are a mother, they can flaunt that, over thin women, who are unable to conceive.

The problem is, guys know this, too. They avoid sex with fat chicks, specifically because they don't want their offspring to be undesireable to the majority. If your daughter is physically attractive, traditionally, a wealthy suitor will pay a dowry for her reproductive rights, and she will not lack for food and shelter. If your daughter is unattractive, she is less likely to move away from home soon, and will be a drain on one's resources, long after attaining puberty. If a man's son is a 'stud', his father has some assurance that his line of extent will not go extinct. If his son is a pussy, that man may well consider himself to be 'next to last', on his individual family tree.

As an Escort, however, 'dating' him can be a single tryst, Cristy. 'Fess up, would you want a night with a 'young greek god' type, who may have a MILF fetish, or would you just like to look at the pictures? I've never met the guy, but I'm sure he has his admirers, who think of him when they close their eyes to kiss someone else, and he'd have plenty of detractors, who are jealous that he won in the genetics lottery, and they didn't.
 
Quote-As an Escort, however, 'dating' him can be a single tryst, Cristy. 'Fess up, would you want a night with a 'young greek god' type, who may have a MILF fetish, or would you just like to look at the pictures? I've never met the guy, but I'm sure he has his admirers, who think of him when they close their eyes to kiss someone else, and he'd have plenty of detractors, who are jealous that he won in the genetics lottery, and they didn't.

To answer your last question, no. Some of the best sex I've had as an escort and as a non-escort, has been with men who most might consider not that physically attractive. Yet they stimulated me in the best way.....I've always been attracted to the unconventional, even in my youth. Chris Farley was one I always had a crush on and had I the opportunity, would have happily bed. My attraction to the types I mentioned in my previous post imo, was because of their rebel natures, more so than their physiques, I think. Back then, my youth equated physical strength/imposing physiques, with "power", which I realized, as I matured, wasn't the truth.
 
I've seen some of the hottest ladies with homely guys and they seem happy. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and you can't say everyone has the same wants and likes.
 
Madman said:
I've seen some of the hottest ladies with homely guys and they seem happy. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and you can't say everyone has the same wants and likes.

A man having a considerable amount of disposable income available to act as a 'visual acuity buffer' for the lady never hurts either! LOL! :-Cool/"
 
cristycurves said:
Quote-As an Escort, however, 'dating' him can be a single tryst, Cristy. 'Fess up, would you want a night with a 'young greek god' type, who may have a MILF fetish, or would you just like to look at the pictures? I've never met the guy, but I'm sure he has his admirers, who think of him when they close their eyes to kiss someone else, and he'd have plenty of detractors, who are jealous that he won in the genetics lottery, and they didn't.

To answer your last question, no. Some of the best sex I've had as an escort and as a non-escort, has been with men who most might consider not that physically attractive. Yet they stimulated me in the best way.....I've always been attracted to the unconventional, even in my youth. Chris Farley was one I always had a crush on and had I the opportunity, would have happily bed. My attraction to the types I mentioned in my previous post imo, was because of their rebel natures, more so than their physiques, I think. Back then, my youth equated physical strength/imposing physiques, with "power", which I realized, as I matured, wasn't the truth.

Cristy, when Julia Roberts married Lyle Lovett, back in the day:

lyle&julia.jpg

I'm sure I was in the majority of guys who thought to themselves "Jesus Christ, his dick must be huge!", because guys think that way; ie: What other reason could there possibly be for a woman like Julia Roberts to even look at a guy who looks like that?

Similarly, when a guy's bud is dating a 'butterface', the unspoken thought is 'she must swallow', or 'she must take it up the ass'. We don't actually believe that, it's just the kind of joke you hear, silently whispered.

There are lots of guys who really have no interest in interacting with an attractive woman; they'd rather play golf, and make money; she's just one of the expensive toys he's bought. I always get a kick out of the Cialis ad on TV - see our ad in Golf Magazine. If I was in the position that I would rather play golf than bang someone to whom I was married, I would probably prefer to shoot myself in the head, than to join that fraternity.

Seeing as how I am taller, more intelligent, funner, hung better, and more educated in carnal knowledge than the sad sacks on this board, Cristy, it's perfectly logical why they chose to attack me, at every opportunity. It is a common flaw in human nature to covet what one does not possess. I just don't feel shame for being superior to most other people. Mr Father was German, and my mother was Polish, so you could say, 'I'm my own worst enemy'. I teach these guys how, with every post, but they just don't want to learn, just like the Seinfeld gang.
 
Doesn't matter how big or strong he is. I bet I can take him...in a race!
 
Sir Vicks said:
Doesn't matter how big or strong he is. I bet I can take him...in a race!

If I give you a gun I know I can out run you


Incentive is what it is all about
 
papasmerf said:
If I give you a gun I know I can out run you


Incentive is what it is all about

I wouldn't be able to hit the broad side of a barn a anyway.
 
Sir Vicks said:
I wouldn't be able to hit the broad side of a barn a anyway.

Damn.............There goes my incentive....Looks like you are either dancing or running a 3 minute mile :blush2:
 
Signingin said:
He must have a big dick :blush2:


ed mcmahon.jpg

The boxer probably does, too. How the fuck would I know whether he does or not? Why the fuck would you be thinking about that? If you're blushing, you must have a small dick. That's not our fault.
 
Back
Top Bottom