Made with Love
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
North Korea
- Thread starter Olympus
- Start date
W
Wanker
Guest
It was a commercial Damn-Not too smart
:biggrin2:
https://www.hubgfe.com/community/sh...n%92s-basketball-team&highlight=dennis+rodman
H
HOF
Guest
:no:
Why Kim Jong Un Probably Did Not Feed His Uncle to 120 Hounds
Why Kim Jong Un Probably Did Not Feed His Uncle to 120 Hounds
A report in a Hong Kong-based newspaper claims Kim Jong Un had his uncle torn to bits by a pack of ravenous dogs
Kim Jong Un’s late uncle was “worse than a dog,” according to the blustery state media of his purge. But was he killed by a pack of half-starved dogs?
That’s the claim of Beijing-linked Hong Kong newspaper, Wen Wei Po, which on Dec. 12 reported that the instead of being executed by a firing squad, as is typical, Jang was stripped naked, thrown in a cage with five of his associates, and devoured by 120 hounds as Kim Jong Un and 300 officials watched.
The dogs preyed on the prisoners “until they were completely eaten up,” Straits Times, a Singaporean newspaper, who picked up the story on Dec. 24.
The version of events jibes well with media accounts that portray Kim Jong Un as a Dr. Evil-esque figure, a clownish, brutal young despot that finds amusement in wielding his terrible power. It also seems to fit the blustery language of North Korean state media which so memorably denounced Jang as a “despicable political careerist and trickster” guilty of “thrice-cursed acts of treachery.”
It feels possible that such an over-the-top crime would warrant an over-the-top punishment. But there is reason to be skeptical.
First, there is the reporting itself. North Korea’s stubborn isolation makes it nearly impossible for reporters to independently verify this type of claim. Very few foreign reporters have access to the country and those who do, like the Associated Press, are kept on a tight leash.
It is striking that Wen Wei Po was the only Chinese media outlet with the story. China’s powers of information control are not perfect, but the arms of its propaganda machine tend to wave in synch.
Plus, the account does not fit with other reporting on Jang’s ouster. Around the same time the Straits Times ran with the Wen Wei Po piece, the New York Times, citing South Korean intelligence, reported that some of Jang’s associates were executed using antiaircraft guns while Jang himself was killed “by more traditional means.”
The method, in the end, may not matter so much. Nobody would argue in favor of death by dog, death by mortar fire, or, really, any other type of execution under Kim family’s grim authoritarian rule. But the focus on palace politics, rumors and intrigue seems to be calling attention away from what we do know is taking place.
Just last month, Amnesty International of a notorious North Korean prison camp that shows new housing blocks. A former guard told the agency of ongoing forced labor, the imprisonment of children, and of people being forced to dig their own graves. If you are still hungry for horror, give it a read.
(MORE: Watch How North Korea Confirmed the Execution of Kim Jong Un’s Uncle)
https://world.time.com/2014/01/03/a...robably-did-not-feed-his-uncle-to-120-hounds/
Why Kim Jong Un Probably Did Not Feed His Uncle to 120 Hounds
A report in a Hong Kong-based newspaper claims Kim Jong Un had his uncle torn to bits by a pack of ravenous dogs
Kim Jong Un’s late uncle was “worse than a dog,” according to the blustery state media of his purge. But was he killed by a pack of half-starved dogs?
That’s the claim of Beijing-linked Hong Kong newspaper, Wen Wei Po, which on Dec. 12 reported that the instead of being executed by a firing squad, as is typical, Jang was stripped naked, thrown in a cage with five of his associates, and devoured by 120 hounds as Kim Jong Un and 300 officials watched.
The dogs preyed on the prisoners “until they were completely eaten up,” Straits Times, a Singaporean newspaper, who picked up the story on Dec. 24.
The version of events jibes well with media accounts that portray Kim Jong Un as a Dr. Evil-esque figure, a clownish, brutal young despot that finds amusement in wielding his terrible power. It also seems to fit the blustery language of North Korean state media which so memorably denounced Jang as a “despicable political careerist and trickster” guilty of “thrice-cursed acts of treachery.”
It feels possible that such an over-the-top crime would warrant an over-the-top punishment. But there is reason to be skeptical.
First, there is the reporting itself. North Korea’s stubborn isolation makes it nearly impossible for reporters to independently verify this type of claim. Very few foreign reporters have access to the country and those who do, like the Associated Press, are kept on a tight leash.
It is striking that Wen Wei Po was the only Chinese media outlet with the story. China’s powers of information control are not perfect, but the arms of its propaganda machine tend to wave in synch.
Plus, the account does not fit with other reporting on Jang’s ouster. Around the same time the Straits Times ran with the Wen Wei Po piece, the New York Times, citing South Korean intelligence, reported that some of Jang’s associates were executed using antiaircraft guns while Jang himself was killed “by more traditional means.”
The method, in the end, may not matter so much. Nobody would argue in favor of death by dog, death by mortar fire, or, really, any other type of execution under Kim family’s grim authoritarian rule. But the focus on palace politics, rumors and intrigue seems to be calling attention away from what we do know is taking place.
Just last month, Amnesty International of a notorious North Korean prison camp that shows new housing blocks. A former guard told the agency of ongoing forced labor, the imprisonment of children, and of people being forced to dig their own graves. If you are still hungry for horror, give it a read.
(MORE: Watch How North Korea Confirmed the Execution of Kim Jong Un’s Uncle)
https://world.time.com/2014/01/03/a...robably-did-not-feed-his-uncle-to-120-hounds/
H
HOF
Guest
Who cares!
B
Boing
Guest
It's all bullshit. It's their way of saying we are a bad crowd and don't f*ck with us.
Don't buy it.
Don't buy it.
P
Prick
Guest
Must have been a howling day.
RED said:This is all over the internet. As Boing pointed out it is just made up propaganda.
Don't believe everything you read in the internet.
What he said.
Transient said:Does Dennis Rodman understand that over there, "doggystyle" doesn't mean what he thinks it means? :SayWhat?:
:-Cool/"
BEER said:Poor dogs.
LMAO
U
User-E
Guest
The last article I read quoted Rodman as saying that North Korea is 'really not that bad', and that Kim is doing 'great things' for his country. :no:
H
HOF
Guest
Rodman has always been an idiot and always be an idiot!
Cardinal Fang
Reviewer
- Joined
- May 9, 2012
- Messages
- 5,717
Ms. Sarah said:The last article I read quoted Rodman as saying that North Korea is 'really not that bad', and that Kim is doing 'great things' for his country. :no:
Much the same way Joseph Stalin did "great things" for his country.
D
DannyDeVito
Guest
He is an alcoholic and doesn't have much brain cells left.
U
User-E
Guest
I wonder if Rodman's been picked up for questioning by the CIA yet? Just imagine the intel he could provide as the only westerner ever given such close access to Kim and his life.
