Papasmerf got banned. You now have to get banned three more times to beat my record.

[God]

You have the right to forgive him for his sins against you. You don't have the right to do that for his sins against me.

I don't think that will happen, because he's never shown any remorse for his actions. He just forgives himself, then does the same sins again, and again.

LMAO, buddy you know this is not the real world, right?.

Don't take everything so seriously. To make you feel better, he is a 90 year old balding man with no teeth. Big belly, short and ugly as Rosanna Barr.

 

[Transient]

You mean to say, you're not really GOD?

 

[bobistheowl]

LMAO, buddy you know this is not the real world, right?.

Don't take everything so seriously. To make you feel better, he is a 90 year old balding man with no teeth. Big belly, short and ugly as Rosanna Barr.

I don't believe in you.

 

[God]

I don't believe in you.

I don't believe in you either but give you my blessings.

 

[God]

You mean to say, you're not really GOD?

Don't put words in my mouth, I never said that.

 

[bobistheowl]

LMAO, buddy you know this is not the real world, right?.

Don't take everything so seriously. To make you feel better, he is a 90 year old balding man with no teeth. Big belly, short and ugly as Rosanna Barr.

I don't believe in you either but give you my blessings.

This is a joke I allow an avatar to tell me only once:



Full size:

"Don't take everything so seriously...".

Yes, anyone familiar with my posting history would already know that everything I ever write is 100% serious.

 

[oldguyzer]

Yes, anyone familiar with my posting history would already know that everything I ever write is 100% seriously demented.

Fixed your post.

 

[bobistheowl]

Fixed your post.

Full size:

 

[oldguyzer]

Full size:

Good self-analysis there, BITI...:biggrin2:

 

[bobistheowl]

Here's something to consider:

Lets see a show of hands:

How many of you have read a post by papasmerf, in which he has quoted you, and thanked you for a post you made, either in words or emoticons? I can say that I have read at least 100 such posts, addressed to me.

How many of you have received an e-mail notice, indicating that you have been liked or thanked by papasmerf?

I haven't either.

I wonder how many of his 20,000-odd posts are exactly that, telling everyone that he read their post, and nothing more. Take those away, and which trophies would he have left?

 

[DB123]

I am naturally gifted... what can I say? :wink2:

There are gifts and then there are GIFTS... Maybe if I make a wish I can unwrap them:biggrin2:

 

[bobistheowl]

To all:

I was looking at some smerf hentai pictures on Saturday afternoon, and I was taken by how closely oldguyzer


resembles Gargamel, the arch nemesis of the smerfs:



From this moment forward, when referring to that member, whom is beneath my notice, I will refer to him as Gargamel, without bold formatting, which I use to denote respect, as explained to Jessica Rain in Ask bobistheowl! this past weekend; post #544, I believe, but it's within two of that, either way.

 

[DB123]

To all:

I was looking at some smerf hentai pictures on Saturday afternoon, and I was taken by how closely oldguyzer


resembles Gargamel, the arch nemesis of the smerfs:



From this moment forward, when referring to that member, whom is beneath my notice, I will refer to him as Gargamel, without bold formatting, which I use to denote respect, as explained to Jessica Rain in Ask bobistheowl! this past weekend; post #544, I believe, but it's within two of that, either way.

"Who", not "whom". I also would have maybe gone with "who is otherwise beneath my notice" since you were effectively noticing him by referencing him. But I suppose no one asked bobistheowl how he did in high school English.

Note: I get typos, they happen to the best of us. Whom was intentional...

Happy Monday!! :biggrin2:

 

[bobistheowl]

"Who", not "whom". I also would have maybe gone with "who is otherwise beneath my notice" since you were effectively noticing him by referencing him. But I suppose no one asked bobistheowl how he did in high school English.

Note: I get typos, they happen to the best of us. Whom was intentional...

Happy Monday!! :biggrin2:

You are correct, DB123, that was a brain fart, not a typographical error. Whom is used with reference to me, him or her. Who is used, when referring to I, he, or she.

Do you have a piece of gum you can spare? This sandwich tastes like shit.

I'm the first one to admit that I'm wrong, when I'm wrong. I'm not wrong, however, merely because my opinion is different, from one adopted collectively by a group.

Props! I'll click the Thanks, and your statistics should be updated immediately. I believe that bug has been corrected.

Update: Thanks is not yet re-enabled.

If it's something like half of an HTML tag, or a routine typo, I'd call that picking nits, but you understand more than any of the vets here that we're here to teach, each in our own ways.

 

[bobistheowl]

"Who", not "whom". I also would have maybe gone with "who is otherwise beneath my notice" since you were effectively noticing him by referencing him. But I suppose no one asked bobistheowl how he did in high school English.

Note: I get typos, they happen to the best of us. Whom was intentional...

Happy Monday!! :biggrin2:

"would have maybe gone",(sic):

...would maybe have gone is the proper sequence.

Your bite.

 

[DB123]

Nah...that right there is semantics. Also, I rotate between proper English and a hillbilly patois (it's uncontrollable), which can lead to things being lost in translation.

 

[bobistheowl]

Nah...that right there is semantics. Also, I rotate between proper English and a hillbilly patois (it's uncontrollable), which can lead to things being lost in translation.

Duly noted.

In National Geographic, magazine, there are never any spelling or grammar errors, except in quoted speech, in which the grammatically incorrect statement would be italicized.

They have about six editors read every word, to make sure it's exactly correct. They do that because people in many countries learn their proper English grammar from National Geographic, since it isn't taught in schools anymore, and it's no longer found in most daily newspapers.

They learn the nouns and verbs from films and popular music, but they need to read National Geographic to learn how to construct sentences properly. National Geographic is the reason why those East Indian kids always win the Spelling Bees, and why they don't use contractions.

Spelling Bee is the National Sport of Indian Women, and Indian men who lack the endurance and temperament to play the game of Cricket. Some people think Cricket is the Royal Game of India, but they're wrong. That's Parcheesi.

 

[Madman]

I want my PAPA BACK!!!!!!!

 

[peace]

I want my PAPA BACK!!!!!!!

Magic word???? :no:

 

[oldguyzer]

National Geographic is the reason why those East Indian kids always win the Spelling Bees, and why they don't use contractions.

Spelling Bee is the National Sport of Indian Women, and Indian men who lack the endurance and temperament to play the game of Cricket. Some people think Cricket is the Royal Game of India, but they're wrong. That's Parcheesi.

What a pile of absolute crap.