Perhaps One Of The Best Anti-Smoking Ads Ever Created.

[Maurice Boscorelli]

A very effective message...

 

[Prick]

Cool.

 

[PussyScientist]

Smart move by the organizers.

 

[RED]

I need to quit smoking.

 

[HOF]

:good:

 

[God]

Well done kids.

 

[Swagger]

:-Cool/"

 

[Curly]

Haven't touched a cigarette for years. That stuff is poison.

 

[ThePunisher]

Haven't touched a cigarette for years. That stuff is poison.

Yes poison it is but losers still smoking after all the information they have.

 

[Wanker]

Yes poison it is but losers still smoking after all the information they have.

It's an addiction and quitting cold turkey barely works. Can we just blame the government for allowing it?.

 

[Lorenzo]

I need to quit smoking.

Tell me about it.

 

[Anto]

If you ask me. Smokers are weak people and selfish enough to forget about how their family will survive after their death.

 

[McGuinty]

Revealed: How cigarette packets might look under government plans to use gruesome images to put people off smoking

• Plain packets could become law before May 2015, Number 10 suggests
• Ministers say it will drive a ‘modest but important reduction’ in smoking
• Drab brown packets will have to be covered in gruesome health warnings
• Cancer charities urge government to 'move quickly' after repeated delays

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...plans-use-gruesome-images-people-smoking.html



Hope it saves a few lives.

 

[Silvio Burlusconi]

Nope its generally recognized now that those warnings on cigarette packs don't discourage smoking and are a waste of money.
If they really want to get people to smoke then they need to ban cigarettes and cover smoking cessation programs under OHIP.
But then again the government NEEDS the cigarette and alcohol revenues, so they pay the problem lip service.

 

[User-E]

Nope its generally recognized now that those warnings on cigarette packs don't discourage smoking and are a waste of money.
If they really want to get people to smoke then they need to ban cigarettes and cover smoking cessation programs under OHIP.
But then again the government NEEDS the cigarette and alcohol revenues, so they pay the problem lip service.

Let's replace cigarettes and alcohol with legal sexual services and marijuana being taxed instead. /-Thumbs-up::/

 

[Art Mann]

Hang on there, missy. Let's not get carried away

Let's replace cigarettes and **** with legal sexual services and marijuana being taxed instead. /-Thumbs-up::/

Better find something else to replace those **** because I want to enjoy a glass of wine with the lovely lady who is about to fuck my brains out.

And I have an acquaintance here who probably has an even stronger opinion on this topic:

 

[Silvio Burlusconi]

Let's replace cigarettes and alcohol with legal sexual services and marijuana being taxed instead. /-Thumbs-up::/

Nah that ain't gonna happen. Mind you as it is you CAN light up a joint in a bar and the province won't charge you. It's because you aren't smoking a CIGARETTE.

Plus just an FYI. I've got 2 friends who were heavy pot smokers (They smoked as long as I've smoked cigarettes) one is dead (lung cancer) and the other had throat cancer. No one I know who are cigarette smokers have had cancer yet.

 

[Art Mann]

. . . . I've got 2 friends who were heavy pot smokers (They smoked as long as I've smoked cigarettes) one is dead (lung cancer) and the other had throat cancer. . . .

And just out of curiosity, were they also cigarette smokers, as is often the case?