IN-Call Review: Charlotte Edwards - Toronto & GTA

[TFZL1]

Charlotte is new here on HUBGFE, but a definite repeat for me. We've had more than a few wonderful encounters over the past few months.

I saw Charlotte again Sunday evening and the whole encounter was just as wonderful as always.

She is a true girlfriend experience, more than just a SP in my books. When I arrived, she's genuinely happy to see me, we talk for a bit and she's interested in what's going on with me since last we met. She asks about my family I've told her about. I showered and helped her out of her dress. Maybe we got a little too chatty, I wanted to move on and the best way to start was with a long deep kiss. Charlotte is one of the best kissers I've ever met. It's not just sex but a total experience. She flirty, fun and seductive all at once. We took turns pleasing each other, kissed a lot and I like to worship Charlotte's ass a bit. Then we made love in a few different positions, amazing finish.
We cuddle, kiss and talk some more. Then a fond farewell.

On previous occasions, I've taken Charlotte out for dinner or other dates. She is truly a Classy Lady in public, makes me feel good to be with her. Especially knowing what's about to follow. She has worked in upscale hotels Cambridge, Whitby and Airport locations, I first met her on a Outcall, and now has a Toronto condo.

https://charlotteedwards.ca/

Please read her website, she doesn't do quickies, and not a pornstar. I treat her well, she treats me very well. ;-)

 

[Borey The Bald II]

Nice introduction buddy.

 

[BuryTheWeasel]

She looks good.

 

[Healer]

What an ass

 

[Rio]

She likes to cuddle huh :yahoo:

 

[Melzx]

Very nice review.

 

[SQUISH]

Sweet review.

 

[Louis XIV]

Please read her website, she doesn't do quickies, and not a pornstar.

This is a very important statement of fact in the review above. Guys looking at booking Charlotte should note that for all intents and purposes, and regardless of all the online 'flirting'. She holds herself as a breed apart, and as such offers what I'd term a very traditional date experience.

If you're searching for wild and crazy, edgy, or something considerably 'outside the lines', it's simply not in her wheel house or within her capacity/willingness to deliver.

Some meeting her for the first time might label her restrictive, but as per the above, I'm guessing the experience broadens and is enhanced after multiple repeats.

Nice girl, prettier than many, nice figure, and a nice girlfriend experience, but definitely not a porn star.

 

[Opus]

We made love :unknw:

 

[Empire]

This is a very important statement of fact in the review above. Guys looking at booking Charlotte should note that for all intents and purposes, and regardless of all the online 'flirting', she really is very much a vanilla experience. She holds herself as a breed apart, and as such offers what I'd term a very traditional date experience. If you're searching for wild and crazy, edgy, or something considerably 'outside the lines', it's simply not in her wheel house or within her capacity/willingness to deliver.

Some meeting her for the first time might label her restrictive, but as per the above, I'm guessing the experience broadens and is enhanced after multiple repeats. Nice girl, prettier than many, nice figure, and a nice girlfriend experience, but definitely not a porn star.

Added bonus taken in.

 

[TFZL1]

This is a very important statement of fact in the review above. Guys looking at booking Charlotte should note that for all intents and purposes, and regardless of all the online 'flirting'. She holds herself as a breed apart, and as such offers what I'd term a very traditional date experience. If you're searching for wild and crazy, edgy, or something considerably 'outside the lines', it's simply not in her wheel house or within her capacity/willingness to deliver.

Some meeting her for the first time might label her restrictive, but as per the above, I'm guessing the experience broadens and is enhanced after multiple repeats. Nice girl, prettier than many, nice figure, and a nice girlfriend experience, but definitely not a porn star.

hi Louis, I assume you're talking from experience when commenting on Charlotte and I agree with most of what you said. Yes, she is very much a traditional sexy girl. Nothing too kinky, but lots of fun.
The only part that bothered me about your comment was the vanilla experience. To me she's more like chocolate or caramel. Or really, more like strawberries and whipped cream.

There is another review on here about Charlotte in a duo. I've also experienced a duo with Charlotte and it was the most intensely interactive dou I've ever had, she really blew me away that night.

 

[Louis XIV]

hi Louis, I assume you're talking from experience when commenting on Charlotte and I agree with most of what you said. Yes, she is very much a traditional sexy girl. Nothing too kinky, but lots of fun.
The only part that bothered me about your comment was the vanilla experience. To me she's more like chocolate or caramel. Or really, more like strawberries and whipped cream.

There is another review on here about Charlotte in a duo. I've also experienced a duo with Charlotte and it was the most intensely interactive dou I've ever had, she really blew me away that night.

Yes, I am speaking from direct experience with Charlotte, and my comments are based on same. If read carefully, they simply re-state what your original review has stated, and confirm what Charlotte herself has asserted quite clearly on her own web site - she is a traditional GFE, not a PSE.

If she's done some fully interactive duos, that's great, but all that means is that she's bisexual and enjoys the sexual company of girls and guys equally. It doesn't mean she does now or will offer anyone a porn star experience. She's been pretty clear she won't, and my experience with her, while a positive one, was exactly what she advertises - a traditional GFE.

When I stated she offers a vanilla experience, it means a traditional GFE. People shouldn't assume the expression 'a vanilla experience' means something negative in terms of service.

Clearly the comments have been misunderstood, as I see my post above has been edited by someone other than me at this point. :unknw:

 

[CharloteEdwards]

Thank you TF for the lovely review. I am so glad to have met you and always enjoy our time together and our unique dates!

I noticed an additional review in this thread also.

I just want to comment that I did try to directly talk to Louis about what he meant and he ignored my questions. He also recently saw Claire Edwards, someone I am often confused with and he failed to clarify to me that he infact did mean me and not her in this review. I just want to make a note that I find it hard to understand his criticism when he will not say here, nor to me when he saw me, where he saw me and for how long he saw me (which I think is certainly important when reviewing a lady.)

I am very very clear on my website, and when booking potential clients that I offer a true sensual GFE experience and I do not offer any rough, vulgar, PSE or fetish services. I genuinely care about building a connection with my clients and only see select people because I want to ensure everyone has an enjoyable time and that there is a deeper connection of some sort as I operate on a high repeat basis and don't prefer random one off experiences.

I did take offence to Louis' comments saying that I am vanilla and it is not in my wheelhouse or in my capacity to offer anything other than a traditional date experience. That is insulting, I am absolutely capable of offering what I am comfortable with, as well as things that are beyond what I advertise. I find this bizarre to come from someone who won't even mention when he saw me or for how long of an appointment. How can he possibly know everything that is in my wheelhouse or what I am capable of? I have yet to book anyone on HUBGFE directly as I am a new advertiser here.

If someone chooses to see me once when they are used to porn star girls with CIM finishes (as many of Louis' reviews reflect) knowing that I do not offer services I am not personally comfortable offering for my safety I don't think there is any reason to criticize. I have never had anyone complain in a session or afterwards afterwards. I think it's a bit much to expect (or even mention in a negative way that I do not offer) wild/crazy/pse behaviour from someone such as myself when my ads and reviews all state GFE.

I have never misrepresented myself and as I said previously I really do care about my clients and the total experience whether you see me for an hour or for 24 hours. I am a VERY caring, sensual, and kind person. I try to to put all of my personal energy into sessions to make someone feel like I am truly their girlfriend for the appointment, and that means more of an emotional connection (where I care how you are feeling while being with me) along with the naughty GFE acronyms (as opposed to just a hold me down and do what you will with me sort of porno experience). I try to offer a very special intimate brand of GFE and do not want to be relegated to being coined as just vanilla thank you.

I also really enjoy offering fully interactive duos for clients as TF mentioned as well, which I definitely don't consider something "vanilla" how many of your girlfriends or wives offer fully interactive threesomes with their sexy girlfriends along with dirty talk hmm? So while you may not enjoy CIM from us, you do get to enjoy having 2 naughty girls all over you and each other which is more than a standard gfe/vanilla experience as well.

 

[Louis XIV]

I just want to comment that I did try to directly talk to Louis about what he meant and he ignored my questions. He also recently saw Claire Edwards, someone I am often confused with and he failed to clarify to me that he in fact did mean me and not her in this review. I just want to make a note that I find it hard to understand his criticism when he will not say here, nor to me when he saw me, where he saw me and for how long he saw me (which I think is certainly important when reviewing a lady.

Uh, excuse me!~? I did not ignore your questions. I answered your questions quite clearly, just not in the manner you desired. I told you that:

a) I was not confused between you and Claire Edwards, and that my comments were indeed about YOU, and based on my direct experience with YOU.

b) that it is not a best practice in the industry for guys to reveal their online handles in such a fashion that they can be easily associated with other online handles on alternate boards, with online reviews, with specific hobby contact/booking information, or with their real life identity. As such, and as a matter of privacy, security and trust, I declined to specify the detailed coordinates of our session. I find it unfortunate that this is a concept that you find hard to understand, especially under the current circumstances. I'm fairly sure any guy that hobbies, and pretty much 99% of SP's understand the problems your demand poses.

c) my comments should not be construed as criticism. In this regard, I've tried to clarify my thoughts earlier in this thread. If you choose to remain offended and insulted, that is entirely your perogative.

 

[CharloteEdwards]

Louis,

I simply asked for where/where/how long you saw me for, since you never did a review and only now are hijacking this review - which since i hadn't seen any new clients in a while I thought perhaps you had me confused with Claire Edwards (who you just reviewed), or maybe you didn't see me, or maybe it was a really long time ago. All are possibilities with zero clarification. I certainly did not ask you for your name/personal information for any ulterior motives or jeopardize your anonymity in the slightest! I am not trying to screen someone after the fact.

Perhaps you don't realize how unnerving it can be for an SP, when someone who claims to have seen her acts suspicious when she says sorry I don't remember you could you tell me when/where at least for me to know? I'm a very invested provider, as I said I don't operate on random encounters so yes this vague review and judgements out of left field make me uneasy as I have no way of knowing you actually saw me that's all. You talk as though you know everything about me and I have no reference as to what transpired between us.

 

[Louis XIV]

Louis,

I simply asked for where/where/how long you saw me for, since you never did a review and only now are hijacking this review - which since i hadn't seen any new clients in a while I thought perhaps you had me confused with Claire Edwards (who you just reviewed), or maybe you didn't see me, or maybe it was a really long time ago. All are possibilities with zero clarification. I certainly did not ask you for your name/personal information for any ulterior motives or jeopardize your anonymity in the slightest! I am not trying to screen someone after the fact.

Perhaps you don't realize how unnerving it can be for an SP, when someone who claims to have seen her acts suspicious when she says sorry I don't remember you could you tell me when/where at least for me to know? I'm a very invested provider, as I said I don't operate on random encounters so yes this vague review and judgements out of left field make me uneasy as I have no way of knowing you actually saw me that's all. You talk as though you know everything about me and I have no reference as to what transpired between us.

Charlotte - no one is hijacking your review. I provided relevant comments that both reinforced and confirmed statements originally posted in the initial review, AND which directly mirror the statements you have posted to your own website in terms of services offered.

In both cases, it's been made abundantly clear you offer traditional GFE services, and do not feel comfortable offering PSE services.

It's unfortunate that you seem to take exception to being categorized as a 'vanilla' service provider (interactive duos notwithstanding), but that is in fact what most, if not all guys who see you can expect when meeting you - a ‘vanilla’, non-PSE, traditional GFE encounter. This assertion is based on your own words, and independent reviews from different guys who have seen you, me included.

Read the last line of the OP’s review: “Please read her website, she doesn't do quickies, and not a pornstar.”

From my comments above: “Guys looking at booking Charlotte should note that for all intents and purposes, and regardless of all the online 'flirting', she really is very much a vanilla experience.. She holds herself as a breed apart, and as such offers what I'd term a very traditional date experience. If you're searching for wild and crazy, edgy, or something considerably 'outside the lines', it's simply not in her wheel house or within her capacity/willingness to deliver. Some meeting her for the first time might label her restrictive, but as per the above, I'm guessing the experience broadens and is enhanced after multiple repeats. Nice girl, prettier than many, nice figure, and a nice girlfriend experience, but definitely not a porn star.”

From your own comments above: “I am very very clear on my website, and when booking potential clients that I offer a true sensual GFE experience and I do not offer any rough, vulgar, PSE or fetish services. If someone chooses to see me once when they are used to porn star girls with CIM finishes …knowing that I do not offer services I am not personally comfortable offering for my safety I don't think there is any reason to criticize. I think it's a bit much to expect (or even mention in a negative way that I do not offer) wild/crazy/pse behaviour from someone such as myself when my ads and reviews all state GFE.…I try to offer a very special intimate brand of GFE…”

Not sure why you’re so damn offended!? Seems like all three of us – you, the OP and me are all saying exactly the same thing: you are not a ‘porn star’, and do not offer ‘porn star experience’ services. (Except where you suddenly contradict yourself above and claim you are entirely 'capable' of delivering a porn star experience when you feel like it, and actually imply that you might, even though it's not part of your publicly advertised services.)

Seems that your righteous indignation in this thread comes with a pretty healthy dose of YMMV Hmmmmmm. You wanna talk about bizarre? That, my friend, is bizarre!

Regardless, no one has painted you anywhere in this thread in anything even remotely resembling a negative or critical light. That part is all in your head.

And we will also have to agree to disagree on what constitutes a ‘vanilla’ sexual experience. Perspective is everything in this regard, and we all have one, whether you agree or not.

 

[God]

Peace to all


:BigHug::BigHug::BigHug: time or start wearing your sunglasses :shout: