Made with Love

Out-Call Review of Harper @ Cupid's

  • Thread starter Thread starter oagre
  • Start date Start date
O

oagre

Guest
Harper is a university grad in her mid 20's who has been in the business for a couple of weeks and is still adjusting. So, don't expect a seasoned courtesan or glamour-babe. Her presentation is pretty much straightforward "college girl gfe". I would rate her face at the upper end of gnd merging into pretty. Her body is a lot softer than the photos on the site would suggest. She is friendly and smart, but a little nervous about being in the business.

The menu consisted of lfk, a slightly clumsy bbbj and of course covered FS. She mentioned that she did not consider cim "safe" and likely would not do it, if asked. She was very responsive to daty and extremely spontaneous and affectionate. Personality-wise, she is still a little shy.

Basically, I would recommend to guys who are into less experienced girls.

Ratings:

Looks - high 7
Service - high 7.

Hope that helps.


 
Thanks for the review but I can't get past the name. I would keep seeing his ugly mug
220px-Stephen_Harper_by_Remy_Steinegger.jpg
:biggrin2:
 
I don't mind the College GFE type of girl. Enjoyed reading your straight forward review Oagre.
 
Darn I have to be quicker with my reviews. Your session mirrors mine Oagre. There was no tongue action she is pleasant but nothing great. I also found her pictures to be heavily photo shopped. Her boobs are much smaller and would not recommend for ass lovers.
 
Invaluable information. Thanks for the TOFTT oagre. And for the added information, Will.
 
Is it my imagination or Cupids and GOF go ovecommunity with photoshop their SP way too much?.
 
Is it my imagination or Cupids and GOF go ovecommunity with photoshop their SP way too much?.

Cupids used to do minimal PS'ing but it has increased since they changed their photographer. GOE have always done it in recent years - some of it quite bad (eg, Alisa)
 
Cupids used to do minimal PS'ing but it has increased since they changed their photographer. GOE have always done it in recent years - some of it quite bad (eg, Alisa)

Don't forget that most of their business is geared to attract non site members that do not know about adult review boards, been told close to 80 % of their revenue. In other words suckers that book them based on the pictures but cannot complain after they see them. Most are already paranoid and happy just to get their rocks offs. Unlike us, why honest and useful reviews always appreciated.
 
Don't forget that most of their business is geared to attract non site members that do not know about adult review boards, been told close to 80 % of their revenue. In other words suckers that book them based on the pictures but cannot complain after they see them. Most are already paranoid and happy just to get their rocks offs. Unlike us, why honest and useful reviews always appreciated.
I am not sure where you got your information from but about 80% of our web traffic is from review boards. And about 70% of our business is repeat and geared towards clients that call us regularly.

We do have a new photographer who has a fair amount of experience at various other agencies and spas in Toronto. Her work is vastly different from our old photographer, Sam and I quite prefer her style. Her colour techniques and lighting is very contrast to the older photos on our site. While our new photographer does edit the photos, she doesn't do so more than she does with other agencies and spas.
 
Back
Top Bottom