Made with Love

The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean So She Can “Sleep At Night”

Maurice Boscorelli

Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2010
Messages
19,322
https://southweb.org/lifewise/the-l...ix-dont-work-are-dangerous-and-werent-tested/

The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean So She Can “Sleep At Night”: Gardasil and Cervarix Don’t Work, Are Dangerous, and Weren’t Tested


  • QiSFuOJ.jpg



Dr. Diane Harper was the lead researcher in the development of the human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix. She is the latest to come forward and question the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines.
She made the surprising announcement at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2nd through 4th, 2009.

Her speech was supposed to promote the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines, but she instead turned on her corporate bosses in a very public way. When questioned about the presentation, audience members remarked that they came away feeling that the vaccines should not be used.

“I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all.” – Joan Robinson

Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all H.P.V. infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle.

All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (V.A.E.R.S.), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions.

At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks.

Dr. Harper, the vaccine developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night.
About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have H.P.V. at some stage of their life. Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.” - Dr. Diane Harper

One must understand how the establishment’s word games are played to truly understand the meaning of the above quote, and one needs to understand its unique version of “science”.

When they report that untreated cases “can” lead to something that “may” lead to cervical cancer, it really means that the relationship is merely a hypothetical conjecture that is profitable if people actually believe it.

In other words, there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless.

In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about about the same as the chance of him being struck by a meteorite.

Why do nine-year-old girls need vaccinations for extremely rare and symptom-less venereal diseases that the immune system usually kills anyway?


It's getting hard to know who too trust these days isn't it?
 
The anti-vaccine lobby has taken her statements out of context and it's really doing a disservice to the scientists and general public that would benefit from a discussion on the real issues she was trying to address.

Diane Harper, one of the lead researchers for Gardasil, has called for more complete warnings for parents and questions its risk-versus-benefit profile because it is not yet known how long the vaccine will be effective once administered.[SUP][57][/SUP] The August 2009 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association had an article reiterating the safety of Gardasil[SUP][39][/SUP] and another questioning the way it was presented to doctors and parents.
The new vaccine against 4 types of human papillomavirus (HPV), Gardasil, like other immunizations appears to be a cost-effective intervention with the potential to enhance both adolescent health and the quality of their adult lives. However, the messages and the methods by which the vaccine was marketed present important challenges to physician practice and medical professionalism. By making the vaccine's target disease cervical cancer, the sexual transmission of HPV was minimized, the threat of cervical cancer to adolescents was maximized, and the subpopulations most at risk practically ignored. The vaccine manufacturer also provided educational grants to professional medical associations (PMAs) concerned with adolescent and women's health and oncology. The funding encouraged many PMAs to create educational programs and product-specific speakers' bureaus to promote vaccine use. However, much of the material did not address the full complexity of the issues surrounding the vaccine and did not provide balanced recommendations on risks and benefits. As important and appropriate as it is for PMAs to advocate for vaccination as a public good, their recommendations must be consistent with appropriate and cost-effective use.[SUP][58][/SUP]
In an address at the sponsored by the anti-vaccination group the National Vaccine Information Center in October 2009, Diane Harper stated that in countries where Pap smear screening is common, it will take vaccination of a large proportion of women in order to further reduce cervical cancer rates. She also stated that no efficacy trials for children under 15 have been performed.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gardasil


 
Kyra.Graves said:
The anti-vaccine lobby has taken her statements out of context and it's really doing a disservice to the scientists and general public that would benefit from a discussion on the real issues she was trying to address.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gardasil




You really don't know who to believe these days.. Every side has an agenda at the expense of the truth getting to the public.
 
Robintheboywonder said:
You really don't know who to believe these days.. Every side has an agenda at the expense of the truth getting to the public.

Here is a more in depth interview with her to clarify.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/marcia-g-yerman/an-interview-with-dr-dian_b_405472.html

The original article where she was misquoted was pulled for being inaccurate, unfortunately the information was already out there and it has continued to spread. There are however many articles and interviews that the Dr. has done since that are trying to correct the misinformation that was posted in the OP's first post, it does women (and medicine) a huge disservice to spread this type of misinformation.
 
Kyra.Graves said:
Here is a more in depth interview with her to clarify.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/marcia-g-yerman/an-interview-with-dr-dian_b_405472.html

The original article where she was misquoted was pulled for being inaccurate, unfortunately the information was already out there and it has continued to spread. There are however many articles and interviews that the Dr. has done since that are trying to correct the misinformation that was posted in the OP's first post, it does women (and medicine) a huge disservice to spread this type of misinformation.

Thank you sexy lady.

And Maurice.
 
If there was a single study, then this would be an issue. However, there have been dozens of clinical studies, as well as thorough testing by several country's Health Authorities, that prove the efficacy of these vaccines. Crappy journalists that take words and phrases out of context to spin them for their own purposes do more harm than good.

These vaccines save lives. I've seen it happen.
 
Yes, you knew immediately that you weren't getting all the facts in the original posted article. Anti-vaccination nuts would try to derail polio vaccines if they could.
 
LickingGravity said:
Yes, you knew immediately that you weren't getting all the facts in the original posted article. Anti-vaccination nuts would try to derail polio vaccines if they could.

Absolutely, and as a coincidence, I was just reading in one of my journals about a new effort to eradicate polio worldwide, and how the new vaccine is being dumped in some countries because of bullshit ignorant fears. So sad...
 
oldguyzer said:
Absolutely, and as a coincidence, I was just reading in one of my journals about a new effort to eradicate polio worldwide, and how the new vaccine is being dumped in some countries because of bullshit ignorant fears. So sad...

That is very sad indeed.
 
So is this true or not?.

At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines.
 
Back
Top Bottom