Cardinal Fang
Reviewer
- Joined
- May 9, 2012
- Messages
- 5,717
I'm sure he'll listen to his kids. :wink2:
There could be hope American friends.
A pair of leading House Republicans on Monday laid out detailed instructions for the Justice Department to file perjury charges against Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.
More than a month after first requesting the department open a criminal probe into Clinton for alleged misstatements she made under oath, the GOP heads of the House Judiciary and Oversight committees specifically where they believed Clinton had lied to Congress about her email setup at the Department of State.
In at least four separate occasions during a marathon appearance before the House Select Committee on Benghazi, the lawmakers alleged, the former secretary's claims were at odds with what the FBI has now discovered to be the truth about her private server.
"Although there may be other aspects of Secretary Clinton’s sworn testimony that are at odds with the FBI’s findings, her testimony in those four areas bears specific scrutiny in light of the facts and evidence” provided by FBI Director James Comey, Reps. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) told the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Channing Phillips. Goodlatte leads the Judiciary Committee and Chaffetz runs the Oversight Committee.
Monday’s letter is a sign that Republicans are committed to pressuring the Justice Department to act against Clinton, even after it notably declined to prosecute her for mishandling classified information.
The GOP chairmen also appear to be making a public case for an indictment, perhaps building off widespread unease with the decision not to prosecute the former first lady. In addition to their letter on Monday, the Oversight Committee also released a 2.5-minute video detailing apparent inaccuracies in Clinton’s testimony.
Following news that the department would not indict Clinton, multiple Republicans noted apparent contradictions between what she said in public and what the FBI discovered to be true.
In particular, they pointed to statements that Clinton had made under oath before the Benghazi Committee last October.
For one, Clinton repeatedly claimed that none of the material she sent or received via her personal email account was marked as classified. The FBI later declared that at least three emails on her machine contained some classified markings, although they were incomplete and apparently done in error.
Additionally, Clinton previously claimed that her lawyers had gone through each of her emails individually; that all of her work-related emails were given back to the State Department in 2014; and that she used only one server throughout the course of her tenure as the nation’s top diplomat. Each of those points was proven incorrect, the GOP lawmakers claimed.
"The four pieces of sworn testimony by Secretary Clinton described herein are incompatible with the FBI’s findings," they wrote.
"We hope this information is helpful to your office’s consideration of our referral."
Earlier this month, the Justice Department told Goodlatte and Chaffetz that it was “and will take appropriate action as necessary.”
A pair of leading House Republicans on Monday laid out detailed instructions for the Justice Department to file perjury charges against Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.
More than a month after first requesting the department open a criminal probe into Clinton for alleged misstatements she made under oath, the GOP heads of the House Judiciary and Oversight committees specifically where they believed Clinton had lied to Congress about her email setup at the Department of State.
In at least four separate occasions during a marathon appearance before the House Select Committee on Benghazi, the lawmakers alleged, the former secretary's claims were at odds with what the FBI has now discovered to be the truth about her private server.
"Although there may be other aspects of Secretary Clinton’s sworn testimony that are at odds with the FBI’s findings, her testimony in those four areas bears specific scrutiny in light of the facts and evidence” provided by FBI Director James Comey, Reps. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) told the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Channing Phillips. Goodlatte leads the Judiciary Committee and Chaffetz runs the Oversight Committee.
Monday’s letter is a sign that Republicans are committed to pressuring the Justice Department to act against Clinton, even after it notably declined to prosecute her for mishandling classified information.
The GOP chairmen also appear to be making a public case for an indictment, perhaps building off widespread unease with the decision not to prosecute the former first lady. In addition to their letter on Monday, the Oversight Committee also released a 2.5-minute video detailing apparent inaccuracies in Clinton’s testimony.
Following news that the department would not indict Clinton, multiple Republicans noted apparent contradictions between what she said in public and what the FBI discovered to be true.
In particular, they pointed to statements that Clinton had made under oath before the Benghazi Committee last October.
For one, Clinton repeatedly claimed that none of the material she sent or received via her personal email account was marked as classified. The FBI later declared that at least three emails on her machine contained some classified markings, although they were incomplete and apparently done in error.
Additionally, Clinton previously claimed that her lawyers had gone through each of her emails individually; that all of her work-related emails were given back to the State Department in 2014; and that she used only one server throughout the course of her tenure as the nation’s top diplomat. Each of those points was proven incorrect, the GOP lawmakers claimed.
"The four pieces of sworn testimony by Secretary Clinton described herein are incompatible with the FBI’s findings," they wrote.
"We hope this information is helpful to your office’s consideration of our referral."
Earlier this month, the Justice Department told Goodlatte and Chaffetz that it was “and will take appropriate action as necessary.”
C
cristycurves
Guest
- Thread starter
- #225
He is the producer of many films, his latest-where to invade next, bowling at columbine, etc,etc and imo one very smart dude
U
User-E
Guest
- Thread starter
- #226
Why is it such a big deal that Hillary lied? All politicians lie.
U
User-E
Guest
- Thread starter
- #228
Large naked statues of Donald Trump are appearing all across America
The name of the project is “The Emperor Has No Balls.” The artists behind the project claimed that they were inspired by the classic Hans Christian Andersen tale, “The Emperor’s New Clothes.”
In the story, two weavers sell an emperor a new set of robes that, they tell him, will be invisible to any servants unfit for their positions. The emperor’s staff and townspeople are too afraid to tell the emperor that he is naked, until a child comes forward with the truth.
The artists seemed to suggest that Trump was very much an emperor without his clothes — a man obsessed with his own image and blind to his own faults.
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/large-naked-statues-donald-trump-192313427.html
George Costanza
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2011
- Messages
- 996
Yes that is art Damn-Not too smartDamn-Not too smart
More on Melina.
https://gawker.com/tag/melania-trump
Also there are rumors that she used to be a SP.
https://gawker.com/tag/melania-trump
Also there are rumors that she used to be a SP.
Well well, she is going to sue them.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/melania-trump-daily-mail_us_57bb716ae4b00d9c3a1976e7
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/melania-trump-daily-mail_us_57bb716ae4b00d9c3a1976e7
[h=1]Trump catches up to Clinton, latest Reuters/Ipsos poll finds[/h]
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll-idUSKCN1182PT
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll-idUSKCN1182PT
[h=1]Melania Trump proceeds with $150 million defamation lawsuit against Daily Mail[/h]
https://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/30...illion-defamation-lawsuit-against-daily-mail/
https://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/30...illion-defamation-lawsuit-against-daily-mail/
R
ReservoirDog
Guest
- Thread starter
- #236
[h=1]Crying Wolf, Then Confronting Trump[/h]
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/01/...nting-trump.html?smid=tw-nytopinion&smtyp=cur
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/01/...nting-trump.html?smid=tw-nytopinion&smtyp=cur
[h=1]11 reasons Hillary Clinton isn’t crushing Donald Trump[/h]Clinton is still the favourite, but this is a far closer presidential election than it was a month ago.
https://www.thestar.com/news/world/...llary-clinton-isnt-crushing-donald-trump.html
https://www.thestar.com/news/world/...llary-clinton-isnt-crushing-donald-trump.html
U
User-E
Guest
- Thread starter
- #239
Trump used US$258,000 from his charity to settle lawsuits and to buy a portrait of himself :NoNoNo:
