Flash Bazbo
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2017
- Messages
- 736
Candyman said:
Guy, to fat chick with attitude problem, says "You know, I could fill your void, but you'd need to pop out a few kids first, before you would be able to accommodate my prodigious genitalia".
She falls for the trap hook line and sinker, and suggests that he's full of shit. He then reaches into the vest pocket of his blazer, pulls out a folded 'Andrew Jackson', and says to her:
"Twenty bucks, American, says you can't take all of it, and I'll offer that same challenge, to any of your friends, who are hot", and that usually shuts them up.
But seriously, a lot of women want to be mothers, but they don't want to have recreational sex. A lot of guys are like that, too. They just want to give other people the impression that they are having sex, with children as the proof that they've done it. They're jealous of people who are sexually attractive, enjoy sex, and are not ashamed of what their naked bodies look like. They live misable lives, and want everyone to be equal, so they try to make happy people miserable. We all know tons of people like that.
In many cases, a woman wants to have one or more children, for selfish reasons: she wants at least one person to be obliged to love her, whether they want to, or not. They can't necessarily get that from a grown man, or a series of grown men or older boys, but they can get that from a kid, even at the cost of every other aspect in their life. It's sad, but true: often guilt is used, whereby the mother bitches about all the sacrifices she makes, and all she asks in return is unconditional love, for what she does, rather than for how she does it.
Many lesbians of past ages would lure men into loveless marriages, solely to procure that man's precious bodily fluids, as explained in the 1964 Stanley Kubrick film "Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb". You already knew that Sam, but the kids out there didn't. Now those same lesbians don't even need a man, they just need a turkey baster, some frozen sperm, and voila!. The government even pays for it. Normally, natural selection weeds certain individuals out of the breeding stock; those who lose at the 'musical chairs' level of procreation. Nowadays, people who should be having the most children are having the fewest, people who shouldn't be having any children are having more than they can afford, and immigration targets ethnic groups based primarily on fertility rates.
Back to the original topic: Religions often teach abstinence from sex, except for procreation, and monogamy, as protection against sexually transmitted diseases. If you were to track the 'six degrees of separation' flow chart for all of the sexual partners of someone, (and all of theirs), at some point, at least one person in the chain will have performed bestiality. You may have to go back hundreds, or even thousands of years, but a sheep or a goat was in the mix, at some point. That's where those diseases come from, originally, as well as others now rare or eradicated, like leprosy, or small pox.
They say that the majority of sexually transmitted diseases come from friends, rather than casual encounters with strangers. This warning is taught in the old advertising jingle from an auto body repair chain:
"Hey mister, mister transmission, hey, mister, you're a friend of mine".
Those who are ignorant of histories lessons are bound to repeat history's mistakes. Sound advice, in an age of uncertainty.
Stay thirsty, my friend.
