Agency Security - Your feedback is appreciated

[Fuggedabouditt]

I'm calling this out because of this

I would really like to hear from the following based on my personal knowledge...this does not get other agencies off the hook but again, this is based on my personal knowledge.

@toronto-Passions - You're a split of incall (hotels) in YYZ and DT Core and outcall. Is your ratio 1:1?

@Minx-Escorts and @Minx2You - You've recently launched your outcall services. Can you provide your security policy?

@Top-Drawer - You no longer have your condos - certainly not after your break-in, robbery and confinement of one of the girls during this. How do you provide security for the (at times) 16+ ladies you have on in one day all over the GTA? You are also known to do your fair share of outcalls.

@Cupid - You are strictly outcall - can you also provide your security policy?

@sexyFriendsToronto - Although you have a great condo setup, you do do a lot of late night outcalls and often have more than one lady in the car. How do you provide efficient security?

@Sassy-Angels - A representative has already confirmed there is a 1:1 ratio on outcalls and usually more than one SP in their condos.

 

[Leopard2]

Ok really? If the agency has no real security they're not going to admit it and if they do have some security arrangements or protocol they won't disclose any information which could help undermine it

 

[Guido]

OH BOY, here we go again.

 

[Jasper]

Here's a new avatar for fuggy, our self appointed security guy.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

Ok really? If the agency has no real security they're not going to admit it and if they do have some security arrangements or protocol they won't disclose any information which could help undermine it

Okay really what? You obviously don't see anything past your nose. This is calling people out to expose their security details so we ALL feel safer. If they advertise things such as "Security, upscale clientele, carefully screened clients etc etc..." prove it I say.

I see it as helping them gain trust from any future ladies who wish to work there or for the agencies to tighten things up if they don't have the proper measures in place.

 

[Godson]

Okay really what? You obviously don't see anything past your nose. This is calling people out to expose their security details so we ALL feel safer. If they advertise things such as "Security, upscale clientele, carefully screened clients etc etc..." prove it I say.

I see it as helping them gain trust from any future ladies who wish to work there or for the agencies to tighten things up if they don't have the proper measures in place.

Couldn't agree with you more. These is a reason for their "share" of the call. To provide support and security. But I do know that most owners are well aware of the dangers and keep a closer eye than those that don't.

 

[User-E]

Ok really? If the agency has no real security they're not going to admit it and if they do have some security arrangements or protocol they won't disclose any information which could help undermine it

I agree. They might be willing to discuss it in general terms, but I doubt anyone wants to reveal their security strategies to a public audience.

It'd be like me telling a client, "Ok, just so you know - I have phones placed strategically around my incall in case you attack me and I have to dial 911. There's a can of bear spray on the kitchen counter, and knives, scissors and rocks within reach that I am also prepared to use in self defense."

When I worked at an Agency, we drove ourselves or took a cab, and if we were lucky, someone at the spa would remember to give us a call when time was up, or check up on us if we were late. I remember many lonely, middle of the night calls where I knew I had no backup if something went wrong, because the girls at the office were all wasted from partying or sound asleep.

 

[God]

Hmmmmmm

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

I agree. They might be willing to discuss it in general terms, but I doubt anyone wants to reveal their security strategies to a public audience.

It'd be like me telling a client, "Ok, just so you know - I have phones placed strategically around my incall in case you attack me and I have to dial 911. There's a can of bear spray on the kitchen counter, and knives, scissors and rocks within reach that I am also prepared to use in self defense."

When I worked at an Agency, we drove ourselves or took a cab, and if we were lucky, someone at the spa would remember to give us a call when time was up, or check up on us if we were late. I remember many lonely, middle of the night calls where I knew I had no backup if something went wrong, because the girls at the office were all wasted from partying or sound asleep.

I only know of one agency that had hidden cameras in their condos, all of them and linked to the owners phone so he could see what was going on at any time. This freaked out more than one lady who didn't know. Maybe he should've told them instead of being a creep. At any rate, they don't have any more condos (oops).

Why wouldn't you want to disclose to the general public that you have security in place, like the driver or a panic button or something? This is how it's done where it's legal. Don't you think it would deter people from trying to harm the ladies?

Your lonely night situation is exactly what I'm talking about. How safe did you feel? I'll bet you breathed a sigh of relief when a known and safe regular showed or you went to his place. And yes, I hear the UBER transportation method being used more and more because of cost savings. Bullshit I say. If I were the lady, I'd refuse to go to the call unless that person was known.

 

[User-E]

Why wouldn't you want to disclose to the general public that you have security in place, like the driver or a panic button or something? This is how it's done where it's legal. Don't you think it would deter people from trying to harm the ladies?

I think fear of the unknown is a better deterrent and disadvantage to criminals, than laying out your whole strategy for them so they can prepare for what they know you have.

I think agencies should be open about it with their employees, and if clients ask for details, I think they have a right to know when they book an appointment, but I don't think it's wise for agencies to tell everyone publicly here, exactly what type of security they have.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

I think fear of the unknown is a better deterrent and disadvantage to criminals, than laying out your whole strategy for them so they can prepare for what they know you have.

I think agencies should be open about it with their employees, and if clients ask for details, I think they have a right to know when they book an appointment, but I don't think it's wise for agencies to tell everyone publicly here, exactly what type of security they have.

Full disclosure is not needed and I think that's what you refer to. BUT, the idea that there IS security (and confirmed) might be enough of a deterrent.

 

[DannyDevito]

As far as I know it rarely happens as homeboys know not to mess with agencies' chickies or you will be caught. Plus you will not look pretty after they catch you.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

As far as I know it rarely happens as homeboys know not to mess with agencies' chickies or you will be caught. Plus you will not look pretty after they catch you.

False. How do you explain attacks, robberies and rapes. Just because someone doesn't steal money, does not mean he won't try raping the lady or harming her in other ways like forcing BB on her. Open your eyes. You're not from the street and or been addicted to drugs or other things that make people do stupid things despite the possible known consequences, this is why we have overpopulation in jails full of stupidity.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

Not one brave agency to chime in. SMH.

:no:

 

[Fiddy]

Fugg,

I highly doubt any agncey will respond. You're putting them on the spot. When you put anyone on the spot, you have to expect to be met with silence. I would assume most agencies are rethinking security in light of recent events.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

Fugg,

I highly doubt any agncey will respond. You're putting them on the spot. When you put anyone on the spot, you have to expect to be met with silence. I would assume most agencies are rethinking security in light of recent events.

That was my point. My agenda was to bring this to light, not just because of recent events, but a general concern from the start of time. We are not Neanderthals, but there are some out there and they mean to inflict harm on the lovely ladies we visit.

As much as the agencies defend their business model when it pertains to $$$, they don't seem to understand THIS IS PART OF THE SAME BUSINESS MODEL.

 

[Fiddy]

The site must have an SP Mod. Why not bring it up with her so she can bring up the topic in the SP lounge where they will be more comfortable to discuss this?

It's an important issue. It's better suited for the ladies to discuss privately amongst themselves.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

The site must have an SP Mod. Why not bring it up with her so she can bring up the topic in the SP lounge where they will be more comfortable to discuss this?

It's an important issue. It's better suited for the ladies to discuss privately amongst themselves.

I'm pretty sure that's discussed among SP's pretty regularly. I know it is. Having this swept under the proverbial rug by saying "Why not bring it up with her so she can bring up the topic in the SP lounge where they will be more comfortable to discuss this? " is just that.

And you all wonder why I take business away from agencies by seeing their ladies off their clock. They feel safe with me. They keep more money in their pocket. They're comfortable in my home and actually leave things here at times.

I'm not saying ALL agencies sweep things under the rug, but the majority do and by them not commenting here... All I'm saying is it doesn't bode well by not saying something, anything, good or bad. Trust me, I'll take more of their business away because I can.

 

[Guido]

I'm pretty sure that's discussed among SP's pretty regularly. I know it is. Having this swept under the proverbial rug by saying "Why not bring it up with her so she can bring up the topic in the SP lounge where they will be more comfortable to discuss this? " is just that.

And you all wonder why I take business away from agencies by seeing their ladies off their clock. They feel safe with me. They keep more money in their pocket. They're comfortable in my home and actually leave things here at times.

I'm not saying ALL agencies sweep things under the rug, but the majority do and by them not commenting here... All I'm saying is it doesn't bode well by not saying something, anything, good or bad. Trust me, I'll take more of their business away because I can.

You are saying that Indys have better protection than girls working for an agency?.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

You are saying that Indys have better protection than girls working for an agency?.

You didn't read.