Captain Save-A-Ho

[Fuggedabouditt]

AKA White Knights.

I'm sick of you all. Every review is positive. Every review is ended with "Treat her well" or "A repeat for sure".

Coming to the defense of everyone/lady in the industry and as soon as someone gives an opinion that is less than flattering, you have to step in to defend. Go fuck yourselves. It's a forum for opinions; good, bad or ugly. I don't care what you do to get mileage and or BBFS from your muses, you're a pawn and your wallet is empty and they'll soon forget you when they leave the industry.

Have fun before your ship sinks Captain.

 

[Thomas Crown]

I agree with everything you said except where you said "they'll soon forget you when they leave the industry" Thats wrong. they forget you when you walk out the door.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

I agree with everything you said except where you said "they'll soon forget you when they leave the industry" Thats wrong. they forget you when you walk out the door.

True for most. The 1%er's are out there though.

 

[HOOKED]

I'll play the devil's advocate here for the purpose of debate. Here is a review rather negative and I do not see any A.K.A white knights jumping in

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

I'll play the devil's advocate here for the purpose of debate. Here is a review rather negative and I do not see any A.K.A white knights jumping in

It's subtle but it's there. This board has the WK's, it's not immune. The WK's seem to come out when they disagree with an opinion of the business/industry in general; not many on reviews here.

Not only are you an ass but so damn childish. Agree or not with Private, you have major attitude. Man you have some anger issues to deal with. Yes it's your money and she should be smell free but you missed the point. Maybe she didn't realize it?.

 

[cristycurves]

What is mentioned in that review is unnecessary and imo, a gentleman would have excused himself and explained to her why he didn't want to continue, or the very least, would have contacted her agency and discretely explained his concern. If he felt she wasn't 69 worthy, then why in heck would he continue on and do other things with her? Since odors such as the one mentioned, usually are indicative of an infection, often a yeast infection, which is easily remedied.
Regardless, those who post such reviews are themselves "warriors" imo, and not decent warriors. Why post such embarrassing stuff. Things like that can be handled off line without hurting anyone. I'll never understand those who can be so heartless and void of common courtesy to have a need to post such things. If he truly cared about helping anyone he would have talked to her then, or as I said, her agency.
There is enough negativity why encourage it through reviews. Post if someone is known to rip off people, or is dangerous, or is using false pics or other dishonest activities that may harm someone, but to post crude or rude things that are mean or hurtful to that person, is cowardly and unnecessary.
If you want to critique someones appearance negatively, at least have the balls to show your own face/body so it too can be critiqued.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

What is mentioned in that review is unnecessary and imo, a gentleman would have excused himself and explained to her why he didn't want to continue, or the very least, would have contacted her agency and discretely explained his concern. If he felt she wasn't 69 worthy, then why in heck would he continue on and do other things with her? Since odors such as the one mentioned, usually are indicative of an infection, often a yeast infection, which is easily remedied.
Regardless, those who post such reviews are themselves "warriors" imo, and not decent warriors. Why post such embarrassing stuff. Things like that can be handled off line without hurting anyone. I'll never understand those who can be so heartless and void of common courtesy to have a need to post such things. If he truly cared about helping anyone he would have talked to her then, or as I said, her agency.
There is enough negativity why encourage it through reviews. Post if someone is known to rip off people, or is dangerous, or is using false pics or other dishonest activities that may harm someone, but to post crude or rude things that are mean or hurtful to that person, is cowardly and unnecessary.
If you want to critique someones appearance negatively, at least have the balls to show your own face/body so it too can be critiqued.

Yep.

 

[JessieJames]

What is mentioned in that review is unnecessary and imo, a gentleman would have excused himself and explained to her why he didn't want to continue, or the very least, would have contacted her agency and discretely explained his concern. If he felt she wasn't 69 worthy, then why in heck would he continue on and do other things with her? Since odors such as the one mentioned, usually are indicative of an infection, often a yeast infection, which is easily remedied.
Regardless, those who post such reviews are themselves "warriors" imo, and not decent warriors. Why post such embarrassing stuff. Things like that can be handled off line without hurting anyone. I'll never understand those who can be so heartless and void of common courtesy to have a need to post such things. If he truly cared about helping anyone he would have talked to her then, or as I said, her agency.
There is enough negativity why encourage it through reviews. Post if someone is known to rip off people, or is dangerous, or is using false pics or other dishonest activities that may harm someone, but to post crude or rude things that are mean or hurtful to that person, is cowardly and unnecessary.
If you want to critique someones appearance negatively, at least have the balls to show your own face/body so it too can be critiqued.

I agree, some statements are unfair especially when it maybe a one off and can be rectified.

 

[Raiden]

I agree, some statements are unfair especially when it maybe a one off and can be rectified.

I had a session with Mya last week and I can only speak to my time but I will say she tasted sweet and I could've kissed and licked it all night! DAMN!

 

[Boing]

AKA White Knights.

I'm sick of you all. Every review is positive. Every review is ended with "Treat her well" or "A repeat for sure".

Coming to the defense of everyone/lady in the industry and as soon as someone gives an opinion that is less than flattering, you have to step in to defend. Go fuck yourselves. It's a forum for opinions; good, bad or ugly. I don't care what you do to get mileage and or BBFS from your muses, you're a pawn and your wallet is empty and they'll soon forget you when they leave the industry.

Have fun before you ship sinks Captain.

Feel better?.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

I had a session with Mya last week and I can only speak to my time but I will say she tasted sweet and I could've kissed and licked it all night! DAMN!

There are not many that would challenge any of your reviews. BUT when you dissect the content, it's full of air; not to say that they aren't valid from a high reviewer such as yourself, but for someone who is looking for details and specific services, you can't really get that except for the obligatory "DAMN" "TASTY" "Get the moped".

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

Feel better?.

I always feel good.

 

[User-E]

There are not many that would challenge any of your reviews. BUT when you dissect the content, it's full of air; not to say that they aren't valid from a high reviewer such as yourself, but for someone who is looking for details and specific services, you can't really get that except for the obligatory "DAMN" "TASTY" "Get the moped".

Isn't that the kind of vague generic review that you're advocating for?

Vague reviews would certainly cut the need for WK's to even exist.

 

[ERecTile]

Speaking for myself, if I had a bad experience, I would take it up with spa or agency first. Case in point. I had an issue with hygiene with a MPA who was once a regular. I was so excited to see her again after a long hiatus. The session was a downer and she had hygiene issues. Rather than bringing my complaints online, I addressed it with management. About a week or so later, the MPA was gone. I don't know if it was because of me, other complaints or the MPA finding alternate work, but since she is gone, why post about it? Here's another example. I had a bad time with a SP. She was attractive enough, and had a pair of the nicest natural breasts I've seen. But she was so mechanical, had a vapid expression throughout and had hygiene issues. I told the agency my issues, and a couple of hours later, the SP was off the roster. This time, I was told that I wasn't the only one who had issues.

My point? I don't really see a need for me to post negative reviews. I like focusing on positives. Sure, if you read my early massage reviews here, I've written some negative experiences there, but all of those reviews were written from memory and i wrote about things that stuck in my memory, good or bad.

A session with a SP or MPA has a lot of variables. The variables I can control are myself and my actions. If I'm doing all I can and still can't get a positive reaction from the provider, then things will go downhill. But, this has really only happened a couple of times with me.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

Isn't that the kind of vague generic review that you're advocating for?

Vague reviews would certainly cut the need for WK's to even exist.

I don't really advocate for reviews. But I think the majority are looking for finer details. While Raiden is always respectful, it lacks substance that (I think) most are looking for. No disrespect to him as he is a fine gentleman.

I guess I have mixed feelings about reviews in general. I simply don't review for a plethora of reasons. Sorry if I'm being vague, I'm a little distracted ....

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

@ERecTile - I think this is the most democratic way of handling bad sessions. I do the same, contact them directly and hopefully, they will handle it on their end.

 

[Jasper]

There's nothing wrong with positive reviews.

Why is it that only negative reviews are seen as honest to some? That's a ridiculous idea.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

There's nothing wrong with positive reviews.

Why is it that only negative reviews are seen as honest to some? That's a ridiculous idea.

It's when those "honest" reviews get defended by the WK's because they think they need to. Even when I was reviewing, I carefully worded my negative reviews and it was only when I gave my true thoughts and opinion, that an eyebrow or two was raised.

 

[Jasper]

It's when those "honest" reviews get defended by the WK's because they think they need to. Even when I was reviewing, I carefully worded my negative reviews and it was only when I gave my true thoughts and opinion, that an eyebrow or two was raised.

Why is "honest" in quotations? Because you believe they are really dishonest or shills?

 

[Maurice Boscorelli]

If you want to critique someones appearance negatively, at least have the balls to show your own face/body so it too can be critiqued.

I believe that critiquing someones appearance who has misrepresented themselves is fair game.