See, you seem to be one of the reasonable ones (ex wives) the way you handled your divorce but the only thing I bring into question is "easier to be a rockstar at work, if there is someone taking care of the rest of his life".
What is "his" life? The kids? Not him. The groceries? A single guy doesn't eat much. The house? It's hers too and would he have such a large house if he didn't have a wife and kids?
See, the issue I have is that too many (even the courts) look at it the way the OP and you do: he was/is able to have a career because of her. Well, as I said, he most likely would have had the career with or without her. So that really doesn't play. Her raising the kids and taking care of the house is as much HER life as his. So you could say she was simply living HER life.
The issue I have is that no matter what, she'll end up with more than 50% of the assets. Even if buddy loses his 5 figure job in this economy, that won't matter to the courts. He'll still have to pay based on the original 5 figure income. Even if he has to start elsewhere at the bottom for $40K a year, the courts say he'll have to give all of his earnings to her, PLUS penalize him for the amounts he is short every month. Believe me, it happens. There was a story in the paper up here where a guy was working in the aerospace industry and the company went tits up.
She was living in the family home, driving the family mercedes, playing golf and tennis while he lived in a cot in his parent's basement eating Kraft dinner and alphagetti. AND on top of that, he lost his licence due to non-payment of alimony, AND he was $4000 in the hole every month.
What got me was that if they'd stayed together, and he'd lost his job, her lifestyle would have taken a downturn. Yet just because she left him, the courts determine that her lifestyle shouldn't change one bit.
So, the moral of the story is: if it looks like your husband is going to lose his high paying job, LEAVE. Do not pass go, do not collect $200. Leave immediately that way, you'll end up with the lion's share of everything. If you wait until he loses his job, you could end up with nothing.....(since you may have to start liquidating assets to pay bills and when you do leave, half of nothing is nothing and if he isn't earning anything, you won't get anything in alimony)......
What is "his" life? The kids? Not him. The groceries? A single guy doesn't eat much. The house? It's hers too and would he have such a large house if he didn't have a wife and kids?
See, the issue I have is that too many (even the courts) look at it the way the OP and you do: he was/is able to have a career because of her. Well, as I said, he most likely would have had the career with or without her. So that really doesn't play. Her raising the kids and taking care of the house is as much HER life as his. So you could say she was simply living HER life.
The issue I have is that no matter what, she'll end up with more than 50% of the assets. Even if buddy loses his 5 figure job in this economy, that won't matter to the courts. He'll still have to pay based on the original 5 figure income. Even if he has to start elsewhere at the bottom for $40K a year, the courts say he'll have to give all of his earnings to her, PLUS penalize him for the amounts he is short every month. Believe me, it happens. There was a story in the paper up here where a guy was working in the aerospace industry and the company went tits up.
She was living in the family home, driving the family mercedes, playing golf and tennis while he lived in a cot in his parent's basement eating Kraft dinner and alphagetti. AND on top of that, he lost his licence due to non-payment of alimony, AND he was $4000 in the hole every month.
What got me was that if they'd stayed together, and he'd lost his job, her lifestyle would have taken a downturn. Yet just because she left him, the courts determine that her lifestyle shouldn't change one bit.
So, the moral of the story is: if it looks like your husband is going to lose his high paying job, LEAVE. Do not pass go, do not collect $200. Leave immediately that way, you'll end up with the lion's share of everything. If you wait until he loses his job, you could end up with nothing.....(since you may have to start liquidating assets to pay bills and when you do leave, half of nothing is nothing and if he isn't earning anything, you won't get anything in alimony)......
