Made with Love

Dogs and all animals thread

Mother cries seeing her autistic son bond with service dog

tumblr_inline_ofd57s5UqG1uustg2_1280.jpg


The mother, identified as S. Niehaus, described what it means to see her son so at ease with the dog:

“See this moment? I’ve never experienced a moment like this…This picture captures the face of a mother who saw her child, who she can’t hug, wash, dress, snuggle and touch freely, lay on his new Service dog of his own free will, with a purposeful, unspoken attachment.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/mother-cries-seeing-her-autistic-son-bond-with-204927256.html
 
escapefromstress said:
Mother cries seeing her autistic son bond with service dog

tumblr_inline_ofd57s5UqG1uustg2_1280.jpg


The mother, identified as S. Niehaus, described what it means to see her son so at ease with the dog:

“See this moment? I’ve never experienced a moment like this…This picture captures the face of a mother who saw her child, who she can’t hug, wash, dress, snuggle and touch freely, lay on his new Service dog of his own free will, with a purposeful, unspoken attachment.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/mother-cries-seeing-her-autistic-son-bond-with-204927256.html


Unlike cats, dogs give unconditional love.
 
Ever wonder what your furry little friend is dreaming about when he or she goes to bed at night? According to one Harvard psychologist, they’re probably dreaming about you.
Dr. Deirdre Barrett, a teacher and a Clinical and Evolutionary Psychologist at Harvard Medical School, told People that dogs likely dreaming about their owners.



She says that while there’s no way to know for sure what dogs are seeing when they dream, it’s safe to assume that their dreams draw from everyday experiences, like humans.

“Humans dream about the same things they’re interested in by day, though more visually and less logically,” Barrett told People. “There’s no reason to think animals are any different. Since dogs are generally extremely attached to their human owners, it’s likely your dog is dreaming of your face, your smell and of pleasing or annoying you.”

But what about cats? According to Barrett, past research shows that cats likely dream about “hunting mice in their dreams.”
Barrett also confirmed that dogs are likely acting out their dreams when their legs move in running motion in their sleep.

She also offered advice to pet owners who want to make sure their friend’s dreams are sweet.
“The best way to give ourselves or our children better dreams is to have happy daytime experiences and to get plenty of sleep in a safe and comfortable environment. It’s a good bet this is also best for pets’ dreams.”

dog_1477009708218_48429353_ver1.0_640_480.jpg


https://www.abcactionnews.com/news/...ut-a-harvard-psychologist-may-have-the-answer
 
https://www.thestar.com/news/world/...dog-a-treat-but-it-turned-on-her-instead.html
[h=1]A Michigan child tried to give her new dog a treat — but it turned on her instead[/h]The family’s new dog, which had just been delivered to their home, had reportedly attacked and killed the 4-year-old out of nowhere, a neighbour said.




doberman.jpg.size.custom.crop.1086x705.jpg

A Doberman pinscher dog, which was the breed of the dog that attacked and killed a 4-year-old girl in Michigan on Sunday. (Mary Bloom via PLOS One)
 
Myth #1: It's the owner not the breed

Myth #1: It's the owner not the breed
The outdated debate, "It's the owner, not the breed," has caused the pit bull problem to grow into a 30-year old problem.1 Designed to protect pit bull breeders and owners, the slogan ignores the genetic history of the breed and blames these horrific maulings -- inflicted by the pit bull's genetic "hold and shake" bite style -- on environmental factors. While environment plays a role in a pit bull's behavior, it is genetics that leaves pit bull victims with permanent and disfiguring injuries.
The pit bull's genetic traits are not in dispute. Many appellate courts agree that pit bulls pose a significant danger to society and can be regulated accordingly. Some of the genetic traits courts have identified include: unpredictability of aggression, tenacity ("gameness" the refusal to give up a fight), high pain tolerance and the pit bull's "hold and shake" bite style.2 According to forensic medical studies, similar injuries have only been found elsewhere on victims of shark attacks.3
Purveyors of this myth also cannot account for the many instances in which pit bull owners and their family members are victimized by their pet dogs. From 2005 to 2015, pit bulls killed 232 Americans, about one citizen every 17 days. Of these deaths, 51% involved a family member and a household pit bull.4 Notably, in the first 8 months of 2011, nearly half of those killed by a pit bull was its owner. One victim was an "avid supporter" of Bad Rap, a recipient of Michael Vick's dogs.5

https://www.dogsbite.org/dangerous-dogs-pit-bull-myths.php





Dog Attack Deaths and Maimings, U.S. & Canada, September 1982 to December 31, 2014

https://www.dogsbite.org/dog-bite-statistics-study-dog-attacks-and-maimings-merritt-clifton.php

Study highlights
The combination of molosser breeds, including pit bulls, rottweilers, presa canarios, cane corsos, mastiffs, dogo argentinos, fila brasieros, sharpeis, boxers, and their mixes, inflict:
86% of attacks that induce bodily harm
81% of attacks to children
89% of attack to adults
76% of attacks that result in fatalities
86% that result in maiming
Embody 9.2%+ of the total dog population



In the 11-year period of 2005 through 2015, canines killed 360 Americans. Pit bulls contributed to 64% (232) of these deaths. Combined, pit bulls and rottweilers contributed to 76% of the total recorded deaths.

https://www.dogsbite.org/dog-bite-statistics-fatalities-2015.php


OIlw6Zg.gif
 
[h=2]No 6: Doberman Pinschers[/h]Dobermans are widely known for alertness, loyalty and intelligence. You can see these dogs guarding almost everywhere. It usually attacks when its master’s family faces some sort of danger. It also takes over when it is aroused.

Doberman Pinschers Facts


  • These intelligent dog breeds are often referred as “Dogs with a human brain”. Although Doberman pinchers serve you faithfully, you still have to train them properly with your leadership. Else, they assume they are the leaders
  • These dogs will do their best when they have something to do. They can even watch TV, help your business and suddenly can sit on your lap too. However, they are completely reserved with strangers.
  • Doberman pinchers can do self-estimations. So if your family is being threatened, you don’t have to utter a word. They will automatically sense and do everything to protect you
  • As these dogs are highly intelligent and energetic, improper training can cause behavioral issues. This is why it has made my list of dangerous dog breeds.
  • These dog breeds are more sensitive to sounds. In fact, they can hear sounds 250 yards away




[h=3]Vt. town holds hearing on pit bull attack[/h]
HIGHGATE, Vt. -There's a debate Wednesday night over a pit bull attack in Highgate.
Tyson is a pit bull. He's less than a year old. He belongs to Highgate resident, Mike Kelly, who's been trying to find someone to adopt the pup. But the dog bit a woman in her twenties, sending her to the hospital with serious injuries. She's not pressing charges, but the dog's fate is being decided by the town of Highgate.
"They've never hurt anybody. Everyone will just tell you that he's too hyper. That's all. And that it's, if anything, that it's my short comings for not getting him out and getting him the exercise he needs. He's a puppy. He's not getting the exercise he deserves. And he shouldn't get out to sleep for mistakes that I've made," said Kelly.
Channel 3’s Eliza Larson is at the meeting right now. She'll have more on what happens tonight at 11.

 
Back Story of the Montreal Pit Bull Ban, What the Vets Omitted and Cited in Their Report and How the Pit Bull Lobby Operates

The Association of Veterinary Doctors of Québec (OMVQ) omitted key parts of medical studies in their report to the ministerial committee. The omissions left some of the studies “unrecognizable.”
The OMVQ report also cited several studies, which they deemed to be “scientific,” but were funded by the heavily financed pro-pit bull lobby. The OMVQ failed to note this conflict of interest.
The 5-part La Presse investigation by Marie-Claude Malboeuf is now translated into English. After its release on August 13, Montreal officials solidified their commitment to pass a pit bull bylaw.

https://blog.dogsbite.org/2016/10/montreal-pit-bull-ban-veterinary-report-pit-bull-lobby.html

HEAD AND NECK BITES (2012-2013) | O’Brien et al.

What the OMVQ communicated

1. “Out of 101 cases, 57% of patients were under 10 years of age.”
2. “Of patients with head and neck bites, 32% were bitten by pit bulls, and breed was not indicated in 34% of cases.”
3. “The second most often implicated breed was the golden retriever.”3

What they didn’t mention

1. Pit bull victims were five times more likely to require surgery.
2. In contrast with other dogs, pit bulls were more likely to attack strangers (+31%) and without provocation (+48%)
3. The importance of pit bulls’ responsibility for bites was a key finding. It confirms and underlines the findings of other publications.



Veterinarians’ Cite Pit Bull Lobby

La Presse called out five unqualified studies cited in the OMVQ report that quickly led the veterinarians’ association to admit it had been a mistake to include them. Four of these studies, policy papers or “self-published books” were authored, co-authored, financed or all three by the American pit bull lobby, whose specialties focus on the impossibility to properly identify a pit bull, including by professional shelter workers, and that breed-specific legislation is ineffective.

The fifth questionable study cited in the OMVQ report is authored by Páraic Ó Súilleabháin -- an Irish psychology student -- (Human hospitalisations due to dog bites in Ireland, 1998-2013: Implications for current breed specific legislation). Ó Súilleabháin is an owner of a restricted breed and the founder of a lobby group, Unmuzzle Ireland, “a conflict of interest he was forced to declare after the fact, under questioning from a journalist from The Sunday Times,” La Presse learned.

more at the link


Pit Bull Bans Saves lives
https://blog.dogsbite.org/2010/06/cities-with-successful-pit-bull-laws.html


Toronto, Canada
Population 2,615,060 | View Ordinance
In October 2014, The Star reported on the glowing success of the 2005 Ontario pit bull ban. Pit bull bites per capital are down by more than a factor of six since 2004.
From 2001 to 2004, pit bulls were more likely to bite people and domestic animals than any other breed, the statistics show.

In 2004, the last full year before the ban, there were 984 pit bulls licensed in Toronto and 168 reported pit bull bites. That’s more than double the rate of German shepherds, the next most aggressive breed.
The figures, compiled by the city’s Animal Services division at the Star’s request, come from comparing a breed’s licensed population with the number of times it was reported to have bitten a person or pet.
Nearly a decade after the ban was put in place, its purpose appears to have been achieved: pit bull bites in the city have virtually disappeared.
In 2013, the pit bull population was down to 501, and there were only 13 reported pit bull bites. (See: related data charts)

--- related editorial ---
Indeed, reported incidents of such attacks have almost disappeared.
Reporter Eric Andrew-Gee and data analyst Joel Eastwood crunched municipal numbers and found that, from 2001 to 2004, pit bulls were more likely than any other breed to bite people and pets in Toronto.
In 2004, the last full year before the ban, there were 984 licensed pit bulls in the city and 168 reported bites. Last year there were 501 pit bulls registered in Toronto, and just 13 bites. That’s right — the number of reported bites went from 168 to 13.
 
C-M you are the lobby section poster what Kirk, Raiden, Danny, Wookie, Muck, Peter and others are to the in call section :good:

Correct my grammar, was that a "is" or "are"?.
 
Non Human Animals are not safe from pit bulls


Almost 100,000 pit bulls attacked other animals in the U.S. in 2013-2014.
Pit bulls killed 95% of 15,000 dogs in the U.S. in 2013-2014
Pit bulls were responsible for 61% of the fatal dog attacks on cats in 2013-2014.
More than 1 in 40 pit bulls killed or seriously injured another animal in 2013-2014
Pit bulls killed 93% of 10,583 livestock in the U.S. in 2013-2014.
Pit bull attacks on family pets leave owners traumatized for years.
Dog bites and related injuries accounted for more than one-third of 2014 insurance claims.



PIT BULL NUMBERS
Pit bulls represent only 4.5% of dogs in America, but killed 64.4% of 360 Americans who died as a result of a dog bite injury between 2005-2015, compared to Rottweilers at 11.4% and German Shepherds at 3.6%.
Pit bulls cause two-thirds of dog-bite related deaths.
Pit bulls are 5 to 8 times more likely to attack than other dogs.
Fewer than 25% of pit bull owners spay or neuter.
Six times more pit bulls are euthanized every year.
Taxpayers subsidize over $2 billion annually on U.S. shelters and euthanization


https://www.banpitbulls.org/why/why-this-site/


People who speak out against pit bull attacks are routinely attacked with comments intended to belittle and harass them. We want the stories of victims to be respected, acknowledged and accessible. We want the facts to be known to the public.

Example: After the death of their 14-month old son in an unprovoked pit bull attack, Wisconsin resident Jeff Borchardt became a target for hostility by fanatical pit bull owners. Pit bull fanatics went as far as suggesting “Let play kickball with jeff’s son head. he dead so not like he will need it” and “you can put a gun to your head and join your ugly son.”
https://www.opposingviews.com/i/soc...-runs-ad-support-bsl-pit-bull-lovers-send-hat

In another example, police in Regina, Saskatchewan were forced to close their Facebook page as a result of threats and profanities after a policeman shot a pit bull during its attack on a police dog.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/sask...page-following-dog-shooting-outrage-1.1407179

Many victims are afraid to report an attack for fear of consequences from the owner. The promise of harassment by a pit bull owner, friends or social media contacts for reporting an incident is not unusual.
Example: https://blog.dogsbite.org/2009/07/pit-bull-owner-says-victim-got-what-she.html


As a voice for people against pit bulls.
We believe there needs to be a safe space for articles, reports, news items, charts and maps that address the pit bull crisis.

Journalists who speak out on the dangers of pit bulls are bombarded with hate mail and threatened. The pit bull advocacy movement was instrumental in having Dr. Laura fired. Its members have harassed and threatened untold journalists including Barbara Kay, Bill Tieleman, Lori Welbourne, Michael Felger, Thomas McCartney and Ann Landers.

https://blog.dogsbite.org/2009/05/sports-columnist-michael-felger-blasts.html
https://surviveandthriveboston.com/index.php/pit-bull-lovers-and-haters-battle-via-social-media/
https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AIBAJ&sjid=mw4EAAAAIBAJ&pg=6858,4883924&hl=en

KEY POINTS

All pit bulls have the potential to attack people without warning.
The majority of pit bulls are “rescued” and their background is unknown.
Children, babies and the elderly experience the greatest number of pit bull attacks.
Pit bulls are animal-aggressive and cause the death of thousands of other dogs and cats every single year.
 
Guido said:
C-M you are the lobby section poster what Kirk, Raiden, Danny, Wookie, Muck, Peter and others are to the in call section :good:

Correct my grammar, was that a "is" or "are"?.

No, he is good at quoting the internet and he has a need to be right. He has had no communication with anyone on either side, nor any experience with any of the dog breeds mentioned. The sad reality is, many who write and post such articles, too have little experience. "this pit bull lobby", I have to laugh at it's title, as those who stand for this breed, don't just stand for the pit, they stand for all dog breeds and against a breed ban of any sort. They don't want legislators to determine what type of dog you can own, nor do they want discrimination towards singular breeds. You can find quotes and interpretations to pro and con, all day long, that does nothing to prove anything, what is does prove is there are careless people owning dogs of all sorts and that there are those who like different breeds and dislike others and politicians that'll use this as a platfoem for elections and points to favoritsm. Politics determining good and bad dogs is the same as politicians determining what race of humans is more dangerous and wanted, isn't that, wouldn't that be discrimination, Canada man? I mean if we were to look at the number of crimes committed by black men, and the numbers of black men incarcerated, should that push us to believe ALL black men are dangerous? The statistics and reports certainly would lead us to believe this , certainly point to the possibility, and we should rely solely on statistics, news reports and political agenda's shouldn't we? Or....... should we, when it only concerns dogsHmmmmmm
Go to any given hospital, ask any doctor, any vet, any police officer, on that day, they've attended to a dog bite, or fight situation. The majority of those dogs breed are unknown or other than a pitbull. Yet when it is a pitbull, news authorities are made aware.
As I've mentioned before,my sister has been a vet for 20+ yrs, has worked with the breed since her inception in vet school, her circle of peers is large, as is that of those who are on the side of banning bsl(breed specific legislation and believe me, she is a very conservative person, she'd be the first to consider euthanization in a dog/child situation. Yet she stands firm with knowing the problem doesn't lie with the breed. Those who report your first quote, saying it's a myth that is the owner and not the breed, please give me some insight into their credentials, and experience. If you can I'll run their names by her and give you more insight, as to how they've derived their findings, and I'll bet you they have political ties:)
On her work in trying to stop the ban in Ontario, it was experience and knowledge VS political clout, guess who won, guess who always wins.......
What most reports always omit also is that child/dog incidents happen when the child acts inappropriately towards the dog, not blaming the child, but dogs read body language, no matter the breed and often children move to quickly, yell to loud, poke or pinch, or touch to aggressively, and dogs are fight or flight so... No one should ever leave a child unsupervised with any dog and anyone who brings a dog int a home where there are children should have training lessons with both from the start.
Now continue on with your google reports:) and I'll continue on with my hands on experience.

But to reiterate my first post and point, that in Toronto, pitbulls are nearly extinct yet as you can read in my google quote, lol, it again says dog bite incidents have NOT DECLINED.....

[h=2]Ontario[/h]Ontario's pit bull ban, called the Dog Owners' Liability Act, came into effect in 2005.
"We heard very clearly from Ontarians that they wanted to be protected from pit bull attacks," said Brendan Crawley, spokesman for Ontario's Ministry of the Attorney General.
Crawley said there are now fewer pit bulls in Ontario "and, consequently, fewer opportunities for a vicious attack by a pit bull."
The ministry is responsible for the law, but does not keep statistics on dog bites. It's up to municipalities to enforce it, and, by extension, to figure out whether it's working.
Ottawa doesn't enforce the law and isn't shy about it – it says so right on the city website.
In a statement, a city spokesperson said breed-specific legislation targets well-behaved dogs while excluding many poorly behaved dogs from other breeds.

Toronto dog owner Toni Baxter's dog, a pit bull, was bitten by another pit bull in June. (CBC)

Ottawa prefers to enforce its bylaw, which forces owners to register their dogs, use leashes and includes provisions on how to deal with aggressive dogs.
The city receives an average of 450 bite reports annually, and about two per cent, equivalent to about nine, involve alleged pit bulls.
In Toronto, the ban is enforced as written. When asked whether the ban was working, Elizabeth Glibbery, manager of Toronto Animal Services, said the number of registered pit bulls has decreased since the ban was implemented, and the number of dog bites has held steady since 2005.
lucy-the-pit-bull-adjusts-to-her-p-e-i-surroundings.jpg
Lucy the pit bull had to be flown to P.E.I. from Fort McMurray when her owners realized they'd have to drive through Ontario, where there is a pit bull ban. (CBC)

Paul Di Salvo, spokesman for Toronto Public Health, said the number of reports of dog biting incidents rose in Toronto from 1,028 in 2010 to 1,442 in 2015.
He added that since Jan. 1, 2015, when the breed of the animal is known, the three most frequently reported breeds involved in dog biting incidents are German shepherds, huskies, and golden retrievers.


With files from CBC's Ainslie MacLellan
  • cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; padding: 0px; float: none; border-radius: 0px; font-family: arial; font-size: 10px; color: rgb(77, 77, 77); background: none"
    |- style="border: none; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; width: auto; float: none; border-radius: 0px; background: none"
    | style="border: none; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; width: auto; float: none; border-radius: 0px; background: none; vertical-align: bottom; white-space: nowrap" |
    cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; padding: 0px; float: none; border-radius: 0px; background: none"
    |- style="border: none; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; width: auto; float: none; border-radius: 0px; background: none"
    |-



    |-
 
so cristy it is ok for you to quote the internet but not ok for me? all you do is quote from the pit bull lobby who deny the dangerous nature of thier dogs


the latest pit bull attacks



 
Canada-Man said:
so cristy it is ok for you to quote the internet but not ok for me? all you do is quote from the pit bull lobby who deny the dangerous nature of thier dogs


the latest pit bull attacks






Lol, what no response to the back man point:) and I go beyond quoting the internet, I can speak from experience. Can you say the same? I've spoken with, and interacted and do regularly, with many who have professional experience with this issue and the breed, and with those who are both pro and con.
Your hands will get tired typing reports of dog bites, as I've said from speaking to various people, they happen daily, but only the pits make the news regularly. That too pro and con professionals will admit to. As I suggested earlier, when you personally have on hands experience with the issue, and the breed or are willing to learn from someone personally who has, then I might take your opinion more seriously. In the meantime I can suggest speaking to some officials in Calgary, they'll give you some insight as to how a city can lower dog bite incidents without banning a breed. As many other cities too have done:) But I'm sure you won't because there are types like you who simply take online data as fact without knowing of who posts it or why and who like to then spread it around as if it were their truth and make judgements solely based upon it, because for them hands on is far to real:)
 
propaganda from the pit bull lobby and anecdotal experience are not evidence you haven't provide one valid research to dispute the evidence i listed showing pit bulls are the most dangerous breed. they were originally bread to be dangerous fighting dogs. they are genetically designed to be that way i have heard and read all the excuse and denials the pit bull lobby used to defend their dangerous dogs.

provide valid research evidence instead of propaganda and personal stories and hearsays
 
I think we can all agree that some people think pit bulls are are cuddly little bunnies and others see the as inbreed beasts that are unpredictable and dangerous.

Seems we can also agree that no mater which side of the issue you sit......You are happy where you are.
Heck we can even agree that some folks don't view this as an issue worth the time of day, in the grand scheme of things.

So how bout we let the hackles down and all head out for a beer?
 
Back
Top Bottom