Falliing For Your Lady for Hire

[Raiden]

If I would have to repeat more than maybe twice Seeking Arrangements would be out of the question for me!:biggrin2:

 

[Madman]

All I know is that when I grow up I want to be just like Oagre or Muckin!


Oagre

Muckin




:biggrin2:

 

[Baz]

All guys Pay to Play. It's just that most civilian women prefer their payment disguised as dinners and jewelry.

The difference is feelings and emotional ties unlike a pay for play scenario. Also there is a loyalty and support when love is in the mix as opposed to it just being about the sex.

 

[HOF]

All I know is that when I grow up I want to be just like Oagre or Muckin!


Oagre

Muckin




:biggrin2:

:rofl!:

 

[HOF]

Bullshit, it sure can!​

 

[User-E]

The difference is feelings and emotional ties unlike a pay for play scenario. Also there is a loyalty and support when love is in the mix as opposed to it just being about the sex.

If you'd never spent money on Ida, bought her presents, took her out for ice cream, bought her a ring, etc., would she have dated you, let alone marry you?

 

[Baz]

If you'd never spent money on Ida, bought her presents, took her out for ice cream, bought her a ring, etc., would she have dated you, let alone marry you?

To be honest Ms. Sarah when I met Ida I really didn't have too much money. I was in the process of launching my career and was really watching the pennies. I did take her for Ice Cream, long walks, donut-shops but nothing too extravagant. I did however by the time I proposed , I did save up enough money to buy her a very nice ring. Once married after a couple of years we were doing well and money has never been an issue since but we both work and she earns a very good salary as well.

 

[User-E]

To be honest Ms. Sarah when I met Ida I really didn't have too much money. I was in the process of launching my career and was really watching the pennies. I did take her for Ice Cream, long walks, donut-shops but nothing too extravagant. I did however by the time I proposed , I did save up enough money to buy her a very nice ring. Once married after a couple of years we were doing well and money has never been an issue since but we both work and she earns a very good salary as well.

Ok, so you paid for your wife in the same way men pay for SP's.

 

[Baz]

Ok, so you paid for your wife in the same way men pay for SP's.

I'm sorry but no, not at all. Yes I took Ida for ice-cream, coffee but she was working at the time and probably paid more often than I did. I did later on start making a very good salary and started to pay for quite a bit but by that time we were already engaged. So NO, it was a give and take relationship. I wasn't flipping the bill as the men playing sugar daddy or paying to play. To this day we both bring in a decent living and everything is 50/50, finances, chores, etc.

 

[oagre]

:rofl!:

Hof? Do I detect a little too much irreverent levity here?:no:

 

[oagre]

All I know is that when I grow up I want to be just like Oagre or Muckin!


Oagre

Muckin




:biggrin2:

Thank you, Madman. If you work hard, keep your nose clean and watch your P's and Q's, who knows?...... But in the meantime, you can always dream big dreams.

 

[muckin]

All I know is that when I grow up I want to be just like Oagre or Muckin!


Oagre

Muckin




:biggrin2:

lmfao, but Charlie is my hero, lol.

 

[muckin]

If you'd never spent money on Ida, bought her presents, took her out for ice cream, bought her a ring, etc., would she have dated you, let alone marry you?

Ok, so you paid for your wife in the same way men pay for SP's.

:rofl!: Ms Sarah your killing me, love it. :LMAO: Reality is my wife costs me way more than my lady's for hire. If I knew 20 years ago what I know now no way in hell I would have got married.

 

[muckin]

All guys Pay to Play. It's just that most civilian women prefer their payment disguised as dinners and jewelry.

And there it is, hitting the nail on the head, well said.

 

[Mikehorn]

Ok, so you paid for your wife in the same way men pay for SP's.

I can't believe I'm on Baz's side, but even I think this is a stretch, despite nearly three decades of on and off hobbying (more than three, if you count my strip club days). Maybe there's some tongue-in-cheek here that I'm missing?

 

[oldguyzer]

Ok, so you paid for your wife in the same way men pay for SP's.

While Baz (and many others) will never agree to that statement, it is exactly the case. Men pay for their women one way or another. Always.

 

[Madman]

While Baz (and many others) will never agree to that statement, it is exactly the case. Men pay for their women one way or another. Always.

Absolutely except the odd time the man is the stay at home Dad and the woman is bringing home the bacon.

 

[Art Mann]

While Baz (and many others) will never agree to that statement, it is exactly the case. Men pay for their women one way or another. Always.

In all fairness, women also pay for their men, one way or another.

We know this to be true historically, as women who did not marry were shunned by society at large, and those who did marry became slave to the "head of household." Hasn't even been a century since women were recognized as "persons" under Canadian law.

Traditional relationships have demanded women pay for the privilege of male attachment by handing over power, becoming the "secondary" person ... forfeiting the rights to make decisions while retaining the "rights" to feel pain and suffer abuse.

That's why the suffrage movement was necessary. That's why the feminist movement was important. That's why we all still need to develop more respect for each other as "persons."

Which means respecting people who choose to remain single, male or female, and opt for sex in their lives, whether pay for play or civvie promiscuity which comes with its own emotional pricetag.

Even the lovely ladies who pay their bills by "companionshipping" willing men pay in other ways, be it social snubbing, legal hassles, or health and violence risks.

We all pay for it, one way or another.

 

[User-E]

I can't believe I'm on Baz's side, but even I think this is a stretch, despite nearly three decades of on and off hobbying (more than three, if you count my strip club days). Maybe there's some tongue-in-cheek here that I'm missing?

... a teeny tiny bit of tongue-in-cheek :wink2:

 

[oldguyzer]

In all fairness, women also pay for their men, one way or another.

We know this to be true historically, as women who did not marry were shunned by society at large, and those who did marry became slave to the "head of household." Hasn't even been a century since women were recognized as "persons" under Canadian law.

Traditional relationships have demanded women pay for the privilege of male attachment by handing over power, becoming the "secondary" person ... forfeiting the rights to make decisions while retaining the "rights" to feel pain and suffer abuse.

That's why the suffrage movement was necessary. That's why the feminist movement was important. That's why we all still need to develop more respect for each other as "persons."

Which means respecting people who choose to remain single, male or female, and opt for sex in their lives, whether pay for play or civvie promiscuity which comes with its own emotional pricetag.

Even the lovely ladies who pay their bills by "companionshipping" willing men pay in other ways, be it social snubbing, legal hassles, or health and violence risks.

We all pay for it, one way or another.

Well said, sir. I did not mean to imply it was completely one-sided....just mostly :sorry2: